letters to Swiss authorities
As per the right to truth, following letters were sent to Swiss authorities. They show what is ongoing on different levels.
The first is in response to a deflection of and denial of responsibility by both the president of the Neuchatel Judiciary Commission and the Swiss Federal Prosecutor, pertaining to a broad scape of rights violations by Swiss authorities.
The second is in response to a deflection of and denial of responsibility by both the Swiss Federal Office of Police and the Swiss Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner pertaining to obstruction of justice by denying access to information.
Neuchatel president of judiciary commission and Federal Prosecutor
Date: 8 May 2023, 4:58 pm Copied to: – Swiss Federal Prosecutor – Magistrate's Council of Neuchatel, and its president – Neuchatel State Chancellor – Neuchatel Grand Council – Neuchatel child and adult protection councillor – Neuchatel justice councillor
Madam President of the Judiciary Commission of the Canton of Neuchatel, Mister Federal Prosecutor of the Swiss Confederation,
I take note Switzerland became a party to the United Nations Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties on 6 July 1990. Anything that follows means Swiss law, jurisprudence or praxis is irrelevant to Switzerland's international obligation of execution.
Among many other instruments I take note Switzerland:
became a member of the United Nations and its fundamental Universal Declaration of Human Rights on 10 September 2002.
became a party to the United Nations Convention against Corruption on 24/10/2009.
being party to the preceding knows the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression report filed on 8 September 2015 titled Report on protection of sources and whistleblowers.
is fully aware of the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Special Rapporteur report filed on 3 March 2022 titled Mandat de la Rapporteuse spéciale sur la promotion et la protection du droit à la liberté d'opinion et d'expression.
became a party to the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse on 01 July 2014
I take note of a variety of other executionary conventions of which several are also violated by Swiss authorities.
I ascertain on the above basis continued violation by the Swiss state authorities of the UDHR articles 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and others concerning access to a judicial system. Despite discussed and requested previously with your institutions, a competent lawyer without loyalty or ties to the state, and without limitation imposed by authorities as to the work to be performed, has still not been assigned. This whilst the state is fully aware I am deprived of any financial means or possibility thereto due to the arbitrary persecution of Swiss authorities. Despite all evidence available to the state, the state creates a judicial truth contrary to reality, and in so doing deprives in full knowledge of the real facts a non legally schooled ordinary foreigner of these most basic human rights.
I ascertain on the above basis continued violation of the CAC article 33 and others. No protection is offered to whistleblowers like myself, despite it should be automatically made available by the state, despite it having been requested. In fact, Switzerland appears to be internationally reputed to ardently persecute those who dare to speak out about Swiss Authorities organised and intentional wrongdoing.
I ascertain on the above basis continued violation of the Lanzarote convention. No protection is offered to child victims of sexual integrity violations, no protection is offered to witnesses of the violations, no protection is offered for those who dare to report. In fact on the recordings is apparent certain members of your state apparatus do not denounce the violences due to being scared of the repercussion, for their job. This despite reports, and hours of recordings showing how the state is fully aware of and actively seeks to deny the evidence. Evidence such as but not limited to spontaneous expressions of children themselves, or sexual lesions attributed to visits to the perpetrators.
I reiterate I dispose of documents and some 500 hours recordings.
The superior interest of the state in the manifestation of the truth is violated by the state itself in protection of those in power, the authorities, taking active part in the wrongdoing and/or its cover-up.
The actors in the Canton of Neuchatel and Switzerland at large (including Geneva, Bern, Jura) seek to cover up in order to protect Swiss authorities committing violations of international law and criminal acts, helped by a judicial system devoid of any respect for the rule of international law or human rights.
Seeing Swiss authorities continue to decline opportunities for the rule of international law to be respected, and respect of human rights to prevail, and continue to do everything for the manifestation of the truth to remain impossible, based on the universal principle of the right to truth I will continue to publish for the interest of the broader public to be aware of the criminality within and by Swiss authorities. Particular groups of concern such as foreigners, expatriates and frontaliers should be fully aware about the risk they and their children encounter in the context of by Swiss authorities co-organised: – international child kidnapping from at least 4 countries – exposure of children to psychological and sexual violence – persecution by the state of those who dare to blow the whistle – intimidation and various human rights violations
The human rights violations are many, such as but not limited to abuse of power, abuse of international instruments, destruction and dismissal of evidence, accepting false evidence, the creation of judicial truths contrary to reality in order to protect wrongdoing by authorities, intimidation and violation of victims and witness rights, intimidation of foreign justice systems, bribery and corruption including paid for contracts, keeping children detained within its borders on the basis of arbitrary and illegal rulings, keeping children in situations of recidivist sexual and psychological violence, ... in full knowledge of and participation by Swiss authorities.
As stated before, if the contents of my messages is not in accordance with your expectations, and as such better redacted by a person fully competent in matters of the law, such as a lawyer, I reiterate it is your duty and obligation under the UDHR to provide one who has the necessary expertise, is not conditioned by loyalty to or fear of persecution by the state, is fully funded by the state in accordance with the real going rates of legal representation and not the state imposed poverty rates, and is not subject to the obligation to request authorisation by the state for actions to be performed.
As evidenced by being party to international instruments, I, my children, and the other victims about whom I have evidence are entitled to protection by the state, not persecution by its authorities. Being it under the hospices of victim protection and/or whistleblower protection, both are due, both denied by the state in violation of Switzerland's international obligations.
Given Swiss authorities to the highest level have made statements and acts in violation of international law, and clearly choose the path of covering up, in due time a full report will be filed with the international authorities.
It will also show the way in which the Swiss press is scared to perform its duty as the 4th power due to the state of Swiss persecuting laws, and the corrupted influence menacing journalist jobs if speaking out.
Without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested.
Swiss Federal Office of Police and the Swiss Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner
Date: 9 May 2023, 8:08 am Copied to: – Federal Office of Police – Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner
Referring to the various correspondences with the Federal Office of Police (FEDPOL) since initio 2022; Referring to the various correspondence with the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner (FDPIC); Referring to the phone calls contents with these services; Referring to the GDPR, SIS-II and other rules; Referring to the various United Nations and Council of Europe conventions; Referring to the convention of Vienna on the law of treaties, rendering the nature of Swiss federal law, jurisprudence or praxis subordinate to international law;
I thank the Swiss Data Protection Officer for assistance in obtaining at least limited remedy as to the ongoing data access violations by Swiss authorities and subsequent correction needs. My correspondence dd. March 20th 2023 remained without any reply or remedy. It has now been more then one year since the original request for access to information.
Your institutions rendering the same response, over and over again, in different formats and different methods with different dates, is not going to change the fact your services are denying access to information, among others, of my children, whilst having all elements thereto. Nor does it change the fact there is by not providing access a participation of your institutions to violation of human rights.
As FEDPOL was designated the responsible for the databases, FEDPOL's deferring of its responsibility to Cantonal or local authorities does not add up under the convention of Vienna on the law of treaties, nor under GDPR, nor under other international instruments.
FEDPOL handles a policy violating even Swiss law expressly defined rules, needlessly complicating access to information, and openly requiring for an individual to go to court. This arbitrarily adds unnecessary time, cost and strain to the universal right of access to information, constituting obstruction to justice.
Further in violation of international law, FEDPOL does not name a physical person as ultimate responsible. In so doing it protects the wrongdoing of the FEDPOL institution against accountability. This makes any recourse to the ultimate responsible person for data access impossible.
As per GDPR, the designated person responsible for the data is personally liable for fines of 10 million euro and more. The delays set forth both under international law, praxis and GDPR, and even under Swiss regulations have been long passed. The passing of time increases the possibility of destruction of evidence (cover-up which has already happened by other Swiss authorities), and is in violation of law.
I understood from the telephone conversations with Mrs. Caroline Gloor Scheidegger, who appears to be the Head of the International Affairs/Cantons Division for the FDPIC that FEDPOL is rendering the access to information unnecessarily difficult.
Quite a statement from someone who I hope to be well expertised about these matters. This while FEDPOL is allegedly the detainer, and as per GDPR responsible party to provide access to and make sure the information contained within is correct.
Ultimately, Mrs. Gloor Scheidegger's department overseeing the correct execution by FEDPOL also seems, unable to obtain the data from FEDPOL's “complicated” stance, referring me to personally having to take data access rights to court, without a named individual to hold personally accountable for the wrongdoing.
Is Switzerland really a FEDPOL police dictatorship country, with no respect for the law or human rights, to which procedural supervisory bodies like the FDPIC are subordinate?
Despite discussed and requested previously with your institutions, a competent lawyer without loyalty or ties to the state, and without the typical limitation imposed by Swiss authorities as to the work to be performed, has still not been assigned.
Both FEDPOL and FDPIC do not undertake the necessary steps to provide the necessary legal assistance to the procedure they arbitrarily and against law force upon a foreign individual who is not schooled or trained in matters of the law. It is clearly mandatory under the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights articles 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 for the state to provide. In effect this non attribution of the tools required (lawyer and financial means) renders the access to information, and justice, impossible.
It is particularly concerning this happens in a situation whereby the state is fully aware I am deprived of any financial means or possibility thereto due to the arbitrary persecution by Swiss authorities, including FEDPOL, leaving a non legally schooled ordinary foreigner deprived of the most basic human rights.
This non providing of access to information and/or deferring to other authorities and/or deferring to the courts, without providing the means thereto is:
in violation of several human rights and other conventions, including the Convention Against Corruption, including the reports by the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Special Rapporteur.
obstruction of justice, harming human rights.
active participation in arbitrary and contrary to international law limitation of freedom of movement by Swiss authorities.
participation in the abuse of international police instruments, governed by their own set of rules, which are knowingly violated by Swiss authorities.
It is not because matters are complicated, they are quite simple: data access. It is because wrongdoing by Swiss authorities is a complicated affair to keep hidden by Swiss collegial and loyal authorities when someone blows the whistle. Switzerland persecutes whistleblowers, those who dare point the finger at wrongdoing by state authorities, and despite risk of own life continue to point the finger to (human) rights violations.
I reiterate the data access request, including those referring to my children, as initiated more then one year ago, the various repeated requests since, last repeated March 20th 2023 to the Swiss Federal Data Protection Officer.
As for eventual complaints about the use of language typical with Swiss authorities, under the UDHR article 2 I notify French, German, Italian or Romansh are not my languages. As a gesture of goodwill and in order to facilitate the right to truth principle in divulging wrongdoing by the state to the international public I choose to write in English instead of Flemish, the latter being my language.
I look forward to your answer pertaining to the above message, and particularly to the data access violations being resolved, so the probable necessary data corrections about my person and my children can be performed. Alternatively, should your institutions ardently continue to direct their responsibility to the courts it is your institutions responsibility to provide the required and requested tools thereto.
I reserve the right to transfer all elements in my possession to the international authorities and control bodies, and publish them under the universal right to truth principle.
Without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested.
A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!
information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested
for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog
the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog