I feel it is time to make a list of the various conventions Switzerland violates on subjects of child kidnapping, of child sexual and psychological integrity, human rights and whistleblower rights.

The earlier post is here

This update discusses a fine example on how to patch up a mistake of authority which opens doors to sexual violence on children by persons involved.

In layman's terms: If a convention says something, we don't give a rat's ass about national laws, jurisprudence, praxis, etc. It is the convention dictating. What does it mean in practise?

I've spoken previously about how the fish rots from the head down.

Herewith I share the correspondences pertaining to state acts of child kidnapping on April 26th 2023 and May 3rd 2023.

I will cover here how Swiss psychologists are untouchable disciplinary, in civil court and in criminal court. Swiss psychologists can claim and act whichever way they pretty please regardless of their deontological code, and violate the most basic human rights. Nothing can be held against them, and their opinions are to the legal system uncontestable and true.

It's been a bit more quiet then expected on the blog. Usually an indication something's up. In this case, new child kidnapping co organised by Swiss state authorities.

I feel it is important to define sexual violence on children. There seems to be no universal definition of what sexual violence or sexual abuse is. Let's go from macro to micro, from international to local.

I've separated this NGO from the part 2 discussion, because it goes much further then just sexual violence against children.

SWITZERLAND HAS NO INDEPENDENT BODY WITH EXPERTISE OR AUTHORITY INSIDE ITS BORDERS WHEN IT COMES TO CHILD SEXUAL VIOLENCE.

You'll however find many justifications in the Swiss parliament work, claiming Switzerland does not need an independent expertise body because it believes there are so many NGO's in Switzerland doing the job for them

I herewith copy the recent correspondence with the Attorney General of Switzerland.