When a director of a canton's highest protection authority runs both private and public money and policy; does so at cantonal, national and international levels; and transparency & public scrutiny are denied for over 3 decades ... Meet the Neuchatel corrupted child and adult protection ghost: Christian Fellrath (CF).

Third post in the ongoing series of Neuchatel authority perpetrators, who's who? Yanick Bussy (YB) officially announced on May 23rd 2022 an internal investigation into the criminality and corruption in his Neuchatel Child Protection Office, which never happened...

On May 12th 2021 Manuela de Montmollin (MdM) from the cantonal child protection OPE services threatened (on recording): if sexual abuse and/or kidnapping to Switzerland would be true, my children would need to be placed in foster homes because the Swiss authorities would never send my kidnapped children back home to safety.

We are the 18th consecutive week of Swiss court ordered contact rights violations by Swiss authorities. The OPE, the child protection services in whose care my children have to be as per court ordered, still seem to not know the whereabouts of my children.

Who's who and how “interdisciplinary collegial” are they? A run down of abuse of power, trade in influence, corruption, and how it makes the protection services complicit to Child Sexual (CSIV) and Psychological (CPIV) Integrity Violations.

incest, the sexual abuse of children inside the family, that is probably the most common, most widespread, most reprehensible, most disgraceful, socially unacceptable, morally repugnant and spiritually harmful betrayal of children within the whole array of contemporary forms of slavery

We are the 17th consecutive week of Swiss court ordered contact rights violations by Swiss authorities. We've seen how the highest judicial authority makes certain to not be informed of the Child Human Rights violations, which happens again today. Today, 3 confirmations of reception by other involved authorities thanks to ... the holidays!

Yesterday we finished the series on the right to use electronic communication with authorities and in the judicial system, including email and even fax. Later,

We know the Neuchatel Magitrates Council (CM) bans email correspondence and does it repeatedly. In so doing, there is violation of access to justice.

We know from the previously discussed international instruments that Switzerland is supposed to accept electronic communication, including email, throughout its legal system. Switzerland confirms as much to the International Community in its reports to International Instruments. In reality it rejects electronic communication ...