While they had by phone conceded they would get back to me as soon as possible, it is only today, 130 days later, that a reply arrived. And the reply does not actually address the problem.

On June 15th I asked:

In the name of transparency for publicly recognised Non Governmental Organisations I would like to know the links and/or partnerships between Missing Children Europe and the International Social Service, as well as the links between the national Missing Children partners and national members of the International Social Service. Can you please clarify any links, and contractual agreements, between organisations? Thank you.

Their answer today goes on questioning how 4 months ago the Google services integration on their web site blocked anyone whose firewall blocks Google services from accessing the MCE web site.

They do not respond, clarify, provide transparency as to the nature of their intra-organisation contracts or collegial ties, nor how these may affect and contribute to International Child Kidnapping and Child Sexual Abuse not being investigated.

As those who follow the blog know, I have recordings, documents and contracts of their Swiss partners active involvement in both kidnapping and sexual abuse of children. This includes how transnational and interdisciplinary collegiality (mafia) gets in the way at their Belgian chapter. How their organisation(s) do not perform their legal duties under international law and their child protection policy as a consequence. And how they are funded by perpetrators to be instrumental in the kidnapping and abuse of children.

But importantly, I can not help but notice on Sunday I wrote the the Belgian Parliamentary Investigation Commission on Child Sexual Abuse, highlighting the organisation, and 2 days later out of the blue an email arrives.

If you look at the timeline:

• June 15th email to MCE
• June 17th published MCE research
• October 22nd email to commission
• October 25th MCE responds, without addressing the issue

Of course this is pure coincidence?

I responded to today's by MCE received correspondence as follows:

June 15th 2023 notification of transparency access request on: >> the links and/or partnerships between Missing Children Europe and the International Social Service, as well as the links between the national Missing Children partners and national members of the International Social Service. Can you please clarify any links, and contractual agreements, between organisations? << No reply to date. 130 days. Missing Children Europe still has the duty to transparency. The questions remain unanswered, and not addressed in your below response.

They might get addressed by the Parliamentary Investigation Commission, or they might respond. In any case, the dice are out there, just waiting to see how they're going to be dealt with, and by who.

*Tags: #Rights #Kidnapping #Sexual #Accesstojustice *

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

Time for a little round-up on the ongoing Wednesday's Swiss court order violations by Swiss authorities, as introduction to the wider picture, and the upcoming Swiss elections.

On October 4th Crystel Graf's (the minister responsible for child protection and electronic communication) autoreply confirmed once again good reception of the correspondence denouncing the court order and human rights violations committed by her department. She has, as usual, still not taken responsibility. This has been ongoing for at least 30 weeks.

On October 11th, the ongoing court order violation. Children were not presented to the child protection services. Mr. Schallenberger who is responsible for making sure children are presented at 14:00 in the child protection care not even being at the office.

On October 18th Mr. Schallenberger was according to the secretary of the child protection services on holiday. No information had been provided beforehand. Accounting for week 30 of Swiss court order violations by the Swiss child protection services.

Arabelle Scyboz, still listed as the president of the Magistrate's Council which is the judiciary supervising authority, is still violating international and Swiss law on electronic communication and allowing the corruption by the judiciary she is responsible of. She is still banning electronic communication denouncing the heinous human rights crimes committed under her ultimate responsibility, and still denying access to justice.

All of this is possible under the watchful eye of the parliamentary judiciary commission. Their secretary is in copy of the various denunciations. Its president, Céline Dupraz, responded once, on May 8th, confirming:

sa mission de haute surveillance

Its mission of high surveillance of the judiciary, and …

respecter la séparation des pouvoirs

It prefers to respect the separation of powers then investigate the ongoing heinous human rights violations committed by the judiciary it is supposed to be the high surveillance authority of.

Basically the Parliamentary Commission who is supposed to scrutinise the methods and proper working of the judiciary in the interest of the public, says the judiciary can continue to be corrupted and commit human rights crimes.

The president of the parliament, currently Martine Docourt Ducommun, identically fully informed, has never responded or acted.

Nor has the minister of justice and currently acting prime minister, Alain Ribaud, ever responded or acted.

That in Switzerland the fish rots from the head is well documented throughout the +130 posts on the blog. Above is only a succinct overview.

The public who is voting these politicians into power has a universal right to truth about their state officials involvement in some of the worst human rights crimes, and actively helping for those crimes to be covered up. It is more then just monkeys “don't hear, don't see, don't speak” commission by omission to act.

Would you vote for a politician when you know of unalienable evidence of ongoing human right crimes, particularly against children, co-perpetrated and covered-up by those in power?

the veil of democracy and the rule of law used to validate corrupt votes

Under a veil of imposed silence it is the Swiss authorities who ensure the denial of the universal right to truth. The public and the press are terrorised and do not dare to speak up for fear of their authorities retaliating. Reminiscent of the German “wir haben es nicht gewusst” syndrome under the rule of the second world war Gestapo.

Being witness and having evidence to that, I open an additional chapter in my whistleblowing on Swiss authorities corruption. Why would I keep being scared to fully speak up, remain quiet, in the face of the Swiss wishing me dead and do everything to it anyway. Including attempts on my life.

It so happens that due to my privileged position I can document how the fraud in recent votes in Switzerland was organised. With the evidence I have, I can not attest the end result would have been different, but I can attest to systematic electoral fraud.

I can also attest to the prosecutor, Raphael Arn, having to investigate the electoral fraud while being under influence and manipulated. He has to function in his little village of Moutier, which claims the through electoral fraud obtained status of metropolitan city of the Jura. At some 7000 inhabitants, it surely is a joke. Those who follow the blog will recognise Raphael Arn's name from the child sexual abuse cases, and the documented transcantonal influence and threats by authorities he is under, to let child sexual abusers continue their perpetration against children.

I have it on recording, no wonder he did not want the recordings when I presented him the recordings. No wonder he has never acted on the by him received registered mail indicating his office's violations of various human rights.

You see in Switzerland, in light of any kind of wrongdoing, an independent outsider is not used to investigate. A local, subject to local pressures of interest, is used.

Corruption is second nature to the Swiss. Any government official in power has to take an active role in it. The Swiss even have a fancy name for their deliberately organised wrongdoing. They call it “interdisciplinary collegiality”.

Switzerland acclaims its status of superior democracy by ensuring its controllers are locked in this “interdisciplinary collegiality”. Being it the controllers of the parliament, of the judiciary, of the police, of the medical profession, ... all are subject to the same fancy worded mafia get along and shut up praxis.

Bring on the SLAPP's

Due to my eye problems, I've had the luxury of talking on the phone to a few Swiss whistleblowers over the last weeks. People who had the courage to denounce Swiss wrongdoing.

Not one of them knows any whistleblower who has not been persecuted by Swiss authorities. They all suffer SLAPP's – Strategic lawsuits against public participation - and human rights violations in Swiss authorities mostly successful attempts to silence whistleblowers, and allow for corruption to prevail.

The Swiss public believes firmly in their superiority. How can they otherwise when the press, the fourth power, can not speak up under threat of legal action and undue influence of prosecutors into what may and may not get published. The various Swiss journalists I talked to, evidence at hand, are all afraid of one thing: being SLAPP-ed.

As an example, in Switzerland, a criminal complaint alleging calumny takes precedence over any other criminal activity being performed. First the calumny is examined, only if the judiciary decides there is no calumny after years of proceedings, then the criminal activity may be possibly looked into. By then the combination of statute of limitations and destruction of evidence all account for a return to … calumny. Because if they can not condemn the wrongdoing due to the destruction of evidence and/or statute of limitations, well it must be calumny after all.

And for calumny proving, all tools are used. False witness statements, wrong translations, falsified documents, abuse of power, bribery, …

Another Swiss national sport is violating its international obligations under the United Nations Convention Against Corruption and the OECD Anti Bribery Conventions.

Swiss are so infiltrated in those organisations that whenever the international controlling organisms show a pointing finger at Switzerland, as per the OECD example, a simple alleged verbal report suffices to silence the reporting on Switzerland's wrongdoing.

Let me put that in layman's terms: Go to dinner, have a meal, and a pinch of intimidation and threats, and all is wrapped in silence.

In Switzerland, democracy and the rule of law are mirages. The ego of the perpetrators is more important then what they themselves call the “superior interest of the state in the manifestation of the truth”, or combatting corruption.

To the Swiss, the only truth that matters, is making sure no one dares to speak up against corruption, or be warned of the far reaching retaliation, transnational repression, persecution, including attempts on life.

The amount of illegally, without trial, detained people in Swiss prisons on the basis of daring to speak up against corruption is astonishing. Those who spoke up against wrongdoing and before being locked up arbitrarily decide to flee the country face life-long transnational repression and persecution.

Any access to foreign authority positions is abused by the Swiss, for example like I documented in the illegal SIS-II database usage. Which appears to be a systematic abuse in Swiss whistleblower cases.

The renaissance of the methods of the likes of the Nazi, the Khmer Rouge, the Junta, … is happening in Switzerland. The only difference is these human rights violating regimes came to power on the basis of a series of political and economic crises, whilst in Switzerland it happens with the hidden stolen wealth accumulated by these criminal regimes as collateral.

so who are the Swiss voting for coming Sunday?

In absence of the press, the fourth power, legal ability to report Swiss authorities wrongdoing to the public, and in presence of interdisciplinary collegiality disease throughout the controlling of Swiss authorities, I'll let you decide on how you think the Swiss elections will turn out.

I forecast it will be a team of same-old-same-old with a sprinkle of newly controlled interdisciplinary collegial individuals. Some shuffling of positions, and on the country goes for another 4 years of political and judicial corruption galore.

I already extend the invitation to all the world's pedophiles and child kidnappers: flock to Switzerland. The federal minister participates in the denial of child sexual abuse disease in the country, and Swiss kidnapping authorities have their international child kidnapping dictator uninvestigated for over 3 years now. Really, if you are an international child kidnapper or a child sexual abuser, the Swiss will treat you with welcoming reverence, and make sure your wrongdoing never gets actioned against, for if it should even only be mentioned, you have the superior calumny and other human rights violating weapons of mass silencing at your fullest disposal. Including the omerta'd parliament.

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Kidnapping #Accesstojustice #Whistleblower

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

This week, an auto reply confirming Crystel Graf is not at the office. A confirmation the email will not be read until she returns to office next week, which is once again an implicit confirmation she receives the weekly correspondences about her department's responsibility. If her system acknowledges, so can she, and she must act. Given she never responds and chooses to never act, Crystel Graf along with the others commits by omission to act international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse.

Arabelle Scyboz, the Magistrate's Council chief in command who's responsibility it is to make sure the judiciary works as it should, is still against international law also denying electronic communication.

One could jokingly speak of a banana republic, or a failed state. But this is simply corruption canker in the country of omerta: Switzerland.

Below copy of the weekly denunciation of Swiss authorities court order violations and child endangerment email.

TO: direct perpetrators by hierarchical (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Crystel Graf, Christian Fellrath, Yanick Bussy COPY: accessory perpetrators by (hierarchical) (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Arabelle Scyboz, Martine Docourt Ducommun, Alain Ribaux, Stefan Blättler

All herewith held personally responsible for the ongoing and organised corruption and criminality in international child kidnapping, child sexual integrity violations, child psychological integrity violations, child alienation, victim protection violations, witness protection violations, whistleblower protection violations, arbitrary persecution, transnational repression, discrimination on the basis of language-origin-nationality-gender-membership of social group, denial of justice, violation of access to justice, and other human rights violations as evidenced in the 500 hours recordings and documents, gathered and published for the benefit of justice and the public at large under the universal right to truth principle.

Reiterating all previous correspondences and the demands within.

Is added to the list of child and parental human rights violations by Swiss authorities today, 04.10.2023. Are in the meantime co-responsible by omission to act all those copied to the messages.

In total 28 consecutive weeks of Swiss court ordered contact rights violations due to Swiss authorities arbitrary persecution, transnational repression and racism as per defined in international instruments.

According to the OPE secretary, Mr. Schallenberger was not present at the OPE, and as such unavailable for the by court ordered appointment, and my children were once again contrary to said court order not presented in the OPE's care at 14:00. The delivery confirmation of messages to Mr. Schallenberger remain hit-and-miss, and messages remain without any justification for the 28 consecutive weeks of court ordered contact rights violations.

You might keep silent in the face of your violations of your international law obligations, it does not change the contents of the 500 hours recordings and documents evidencing the heinous crimes of pay-for-contract international child kidnapping, deliberate endangerment and known psychological and sexual integrity violations of children by your offices, committed by your administrations.

By not acting in the protection of witness, victim and whistleblower and not protecting children from further sexual and psychological abuse, you are all personally responsible for commission by omission of crimes.

I again notify:

I hold personally responsible and accountable as directors of their service Mrs. Graf, Mr Fellrath and Mr. Bussy, fully made aware of the ongoing child sexual and psychological integrity violations as well as the Bern, Geneva, Neuchatel, Jura cantonal and Swiss Federal state for these continuous acts of violence and corruption by the state and its authorities.

Under the universal right to truth, publication of the premeditated criminal acts by the Swiss authorities continues.

Should this correspondence better be addressed by a legal scholar, you are reminded articles 7 to 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and access to justice, are still violated by the Swiss authorities, including yourselves. In particular by the Neuchatel Magistrate's Council and its president violating access to justice under International Law.

Referring to the registered mail received by authorities dated August 14th 2023, June 8th 2023, and all electronic communication defined by International Law, such as email and public posting under the universal right to truth principle.

For the remainder reiterating all previous correspondences in their entirety.

Without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested.

Tags: #Rights #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

The EU has used a different approach. The EU used real world case scenario's and asked mystery shoppers, individual people, to try and see what the reality is like on the ground. So the EU report is a more realistic, real world account, based on experience.

Before we delve into things, let's be clear. Between the Swiss self assessment in 2018 and the report released this week, there are a few years, during which one would expect the country to improve, not regress. Therefrom stems additional confirmation the Swiss lied to their CoE partners.

the Swiss in Europe digital maturity map

It immediately shows in easy to understand colouring something is wrong in Switzerland.

the Swiss patting their back: good job!

The Swiss federal bureau of Digital Administration (L'Administration numérique suisse) (BDA) :

coordinates the steering of digital transformation between and within the various institutional levels, and enables the stakeholders concerned to express their views and participate in decision-making. It creates added value for the population, the economy and public administrations, and encourages collaboration between all levels of government. (Translation)

The BDA's press release on the EU eGovernment Benchmark 2023 report goes on listing the great achievements by Switzerland, whilst having to admit it overall ends 29th place out of 35. In reality, Switzerland went from 28th position last year to 29th position this year. Whilst the average of all countries shows fulfilment of electronic society obligations at 70%, Switzerland contends with 57%. On average.

A few basic factsheets from the report can be found here.

the skeet

On Bluesky famous Swiss journalist Eric Guevara-Frey skeeted on September 21st how fantastic and modern the Swiss public services are, stating it took him 6 minutes from request to obtaining his shiny new passport.

the numbers

In the various documents you can see Switzerland's position among the 35 country report:

• 7th worst in digital maturity of government; Only 17% of Switzerland's online services meets the EU basic criteria!
• 5th worst in transparency of government; It is among the countries deemed to not respect transparency in delivering services, or using personal data, of citizens. Let alone what they do with non-citizens.
• 2nd worst in family life; Only Montenegro does worse.
• shares 10th worst in electronic communication with Greece.

A few more numbers:

electronic communication

Switzerland is the 10th worst country when it comes to electronic communication, specified as digital post.

80% of countries offers a delivery confirmation of electronic communication. Switzerland does not, and as such is part of the 20% rotten apples.

For online notifying or complaining about personal data being erroneous, 84% is the average among all countries, and in 79% can be self modified online. Here again, Switzerland does the opposite. It only allows for requesting the data, with the judicial system being the only recourse when the request for access or correction of information is declined (see various posts).

Now, I've left the score of Switzerland justice system out. Because I find it deserves extra special attention in view of its 2018 self assessment lies to its CoE partners.

The 2018 report puts Switzerland as the incontestable leader in digitalisation of the justice system.

The 2023 report puts Switzerland 6th worst out of 35, with only 44% corresponding to the EU norm.

Crystel Graf to the rescue

The Neuchatel minister Crystel Graf (CG) is responsible for child protection, data protection and Digital Administration. She pops up ad nauseam on the blog, as she is the politician responsible for the wrongdoing by omission to act when duly informed.

She is one of the persons who, among others, is violating electronic communication law, every week. As responsible minister, one must believe to not be subject to the law.

Meet the press release on twitter/X announcing CF gets a seat at the BDO. Notice the date of the EU report: 27 September. Notice the date of the press release: 27 September.

my conclusion

I'll let everyone make their own conclusions. To me, it would appear there is the need for people in power doing wrong to sit at arms length in order to cover up more easily, and the press has a need to speak of the country's modernity and superiority, while the reality is grim.

When:

• the 2nd power, the executive, covers up; and
• the 4th power, the press, fails; and
• the third power, justice, plays along …

How do you want such a country to not be corrupt?

Tags: #Rights #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

Today the Federal Prosecutor graced a template response answering yesterday's email. It had already responded back on May 10th 2023.

Basically no one can do any serious harm without the Swiss Federal Prosecutor being competent, but when Swiss authorities or civil servants violate the law as per the Federal Prosecutor's competence, he claims he is not competent. A renewed confirmation the Swiss authorities can do as the pretty please.

Some examples:

Copy of my response, followed by the correspondence received by the federal prosecutor.

response to the Swiss federal prosecutor

Re: AW: 27.09.2023 Continuation of Swiss authorities organised criminality and violations of human rights

Dear Makbule Dügünyurdu,

Thank your for your reply.

Referring to all previous correspondences I once again take note that the Federal Prosecuror's office finds Human Rights violations by Swiss federal authorities, intra-cantonal authorities, civil servants and citizens not of its competence. A non exhaustive list being:

international organised child kidnapping by Swiss authorities, including involvement of the federal central authority and federal judges subject to conflicts of interests, with pay-for-contracts in at least 4 jurisdictions (ES, FR, BE, UK): Trafficking in persons, particularly children. Modern forms of slavery. And others. transcantonal child sexual and psychological abuse, including transcantonal violation of children's protection rights transnational repression, retaliation against and persecution by Swiss authorities, including federal authorities, of whistleblower(s), victims and witnesses of the by Switzerland committed crimes Swiss lawyers and NGO's ganging together, co-intimidating authorities in different cantons and abroad prosecutors being bullied by civil servants and acting to their wishes cantonal, transcantonal, and international corruption violation by Swiss authorities of the universal right to language, electronic communication rights, rights of non-citizens and more.

I thus note the federal prosecurot's office opinion is that the above, among others are not: strongly affecting Swiss interests complex intercantonal or international organised crime offences corruption white collar crime that have an intercantonal or an international dimension offences against the interests of the international community, i.e. fundamental human rights violations

By Swiss authorities kidnapped children in situations of abuse and heinous crimes are due to be identified based on recordings. Any delay and consequences to those children is the result of the denials and violations of Human Rights by Swiss authorities, including your office.

I once again take note that access to justice is denied by the federal prosecutor's office: the packaging of the denunciations does not correspond to your authority's wishes no legal counsel is offered as dictated by international law and repeatedly pointed out This in itself is a violation of Human Rights.

Any eventual inappropriate wording and/or presenting, but not limited to, is henceforth the federal prosecutor's office sole responsibility.

As a whistleblower, victim and witness, under international law I am due protection, assistance and support by your office, including my children, as are other victims and witnesses.

Your office henceforth violates the Swiss constitution, which expressly underlines international instruments dictate over federal and/or local laws and praxis.

Publishing about the Human Rights violations by Swiss authorities, including your office, will continue under the universal right to truth principle, as will the notifications to your office of their ongoing nature.

For the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and have/are being published, in the interest of justice and the public at large.

Without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested.

email by the Federal Prosecutor, claiming incompetence for matters he is competent of

AW: 27.09.2023 Continuation of Swiss authorities organised criminality and violations of human rights

Dear Mr CENSORED,

We refer to your E-mail of 27 September 2023.

As we informed you in our letter dated 10 May 2023, the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland is the Swiss Confederation’s prosecution authority and as such has exclusive jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute specific offences under the Swiss Criminal Code (SCC) that are set out in Articles 23 and 24 of the Swiss Criminal Procedure Code (CrimPC). The prosecution of other offences falls under cantonal jurisdiction.

These offences comprise classic state security crimes, i.e. criminal acts primarily directed against the Swiss Confederation or which strongly affect its interests. They also include complex intercantonal or international organised crime offences (including terrorism and its financing), money laundering and corruption. In certain circumstances, the OAG also has jurisdiction over cases of white collar crime that have an intercantonal or an international dimension. In addition, the OAG is responsible for executing requests for mutual assistance from foreign prosecution authorities. Lastly the OAG is responsible for prosecuting offences against the interests of the international community, i.e. in times of peace, it conducts proceedings relating to genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.

The Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland does not act as a supervisory authority for cantonal or federal administrative, prosecution or judicial authorities. It has no statutory powers whatsoever to review or influence the conduct of any cantonal or federal authorities. As a consequence, it is not possible to submit complaints or requests for investigations relating to these authorities to the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland.

Your most recent letter contains no indication of any criminal offences whose prosecution falls within the jurisdiction of the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland.

We expressly draw your attention to the fact that we will neither reply to nor retain any further submissions relating to the same or similar matters for which we are not responsible after reviewing them, but will dispose of them without first contacting you.

Thank you for your understanding.

Yours sincerely.

Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland OAG

Makbule Dügünyurdu

Tags: #Rights #Whistleblower #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

While she is duly informed at least through her secretary and by having acknowledged and responded to messages in the past, she is personally responsible, perpetrator, of international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse through commission by omission to act.

She also violates the state's unambiguous obligation to protect witnesses, victims and whistleblowers.

As for Mr. Schallenberger, he only received my message from last Wednesday 14:00 this Monday morning September 25th 2023 at 9:15 AM, and today's 14:00 message has not yet been delivered.

Below first this week's email followed by last week's email.

This week's email notifying court order violations.

27.09.2023 Continuation of Swiss authorities organised criminality and violations of human rights TO: direct perpetrators by hierarchical (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Crystel Graf, Christian Fellrath, Yanick Bussy COPY: accessory perpetrators by (hierarchical) (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Arabelle Scyboz, Martine Docourt Ducommun, Alain Ribaux, Stefan Blättler

All herewith held personally responsible for the ongoing and organised corruption and criminality in international child kidnapping, child sexual integrity violations, child psychological integrity violations, child alienation, victim protection violations, witness protection violations, whistleblower protection violations, arbitrary persecution, transnational repression, discrimination on the basis of language-origin-nationality-gender-membership of social group, denial of justice, violation of access to justice, and other human rights violations as evidenced in the 500 hours recordings and documents, gathered and published for the benefit of justice and the public at large under the universal right to truth principle.

Reiterating all previous correspondences and the demands within.

Is added to the list of child and parental human rights violations by Swiss authorities today, 27.09.2023. Are in the meantime co-responsible by omission to act all those copied to the messages.

In total 27 consecutive weeks of Swiss court ordered contact rights violations due to Swiss authorities arbitrary persecution, transnational repression and racism as per defined in international instruments.

According to the OPE secretary, Mr. Schallenberger was not present at the OPE, and as such unavailable for the by court ordered appointment, and my children were once again contrary to said court order not presented in the OPE's care at 14:00. The secretary said there was no appointment for my children today, which is in violation of the court order. The message to Mr. Schallenberger last Wednesday was ultimately delivered as per date and time published online later today, no response has been obtained. This week's 14:00 message to him remains for now undelivered.

You might keep silent in the face of your violations of your international law obligations, it does not change the contents of the 500 hours recordings and documents evidencing the heinous crimes of pay-for-contract international child kidnapping, deliberate endangerment and known psychological and sexual integrity violations of children by your offices, committed by your administrations.

By not acting in the protection of witness, victim and whistleblower and not protecting children from further sexual and psychological abuse, you are all personally responsible for commission by omission of crimes.

I again notify:

I hold personally responsible and accountable as directors of their service Mrs. Graf, Mr Fellrath and Mr. Bussy, fully made aware of the ongoing child sexual and psychological integrity violations as well as the Bern, Geneva, Neuchatel, Jura cantonal and Swiss Federal state for these continuous acts of violence and corruption by the state and its authorities.

Under the universal right to truth, publication of the premeditated criminal acts by the Swiss authorities continues.

Should this correspondence better be addressed by a legal scholar, you are reminded articles 7 to 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and access to justice, are still violated by the Swiss authorities, including yourselves. In particular by the Neuchatel Magistrate's Council and its president violating access to justice under International Law.

Referring to the registered mail received by authorities dated August 14th 2023, June 8th 2023, and all electronic communication defined by International Law, such as email and public posting under the universal right to truth principle.

For the remainder reiterating all previous correspondences in their entirety.

Without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested.

Last week's email notifying court order violations.

20.09.2023 Continuation of Swiss authorities organised criminality and violations of human rights TO: direct perpetrators by hierarchical (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Crystel Graf, Christian Fellrath, Yanick Bussy COPY: accessory perpetrators by (hierarchical) (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Arabelle Scyboz, Martine Docourt Ducommun, Alain Ribaux, Stefan Blättler

All herewith held personally responsible for the ongoing and organised corruption and criminality in international child kidnapping, child sexual integrity violations, child psychological integrity violations, child alienation, victim protection violations, witness protection violations, whistleblower protection violations, arbitrary persecution, transnational repression, discrimination on the basis of language-origin-nationality-gender-membership of social group, denial of justice, violation of access to justice, and other human rights violations as evidenced in the 500 hours recordings and documents, gathered and published for the benefit of justice and the public at large under the universal right to truth principle.

Reiterating all previous correspondences and the demands within.

Is added to the list of child and parental human rights violations by Swiss authorities today, 20.09.2023. Are in the meantime co-responsible by omission to act all those copied to the messages.

In total 26 consecutive weeks of Swiss court ordered contact rights violations due to Swiss authorities arbitrary persecution, transnational repression and racism as per defined in international instruments.

According to the OPE secretary, Mr. Schallenberger was not present at the OPE, and as such unavailable for the by court ordered appointment, and my children were once again contrary to said court order not presented in the OPE's care at 14:00. The previous messages to Mr. Schallenberger ultimately delivered as per published, no response has been obtained. This week's 14:00 message remained undelivered.

You might keep silent in the face of your violations of your international law obligations, it does not change the contents of the 500 hours recordings and documents evidencing the heinous crimes of pay-for-contract international child kidnapping, deliberate endangerment and known psychological and sexual integrity violations of children by your offices, committed by your administrations.

I again notify:

I hold personally responsible and accountable as directors of their service Mrs. Graf, Mr Fellrath and Mr. Bussy, fully made aware of the ongoing child sexual and psychological integrity violations as well as the Bern, Geneva, Neuchatel, Jura cantonal and Swiss Federal state for these continuous acts of violence and corruption by the state and its authorities.

Under the universal right to truth, publication of the premeditated criminal acts by the Swiss authorities continues.

Should this correspondence better be addressed by a legal scholar, you are reminded articles 7 to 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and access to justice, are still violated by the Swiss authorities, including yourselves. In particular by the Neuchatel Magistrate's Council and its president violating access to justice under International Law.

Referring to the registered mail received by authorities dated August 14th 2023, June 8th 2023, and all electronic communication defined by International Law, such as email and public posting under the universal right to truth principle.

For the remainder reiterating all previous correspondences in their entirety.

Without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested.

Tags: #Rights #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

I am battling with IT, unable to publish a clickable graphic page. So herewith a static picture, and this linked PDF of the picture with clickable links. Underneath the descriptions.

Crystel Graf

Crystel Graf is minister of child protection services, discussed.

• Contacted and complained to repeatedly about the chain of command silencing the corruption and criminality.
• Never acknowledged receipt other then holiday auto-replies. Never acted.
• Perpetrator through commission by omission of international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse.
• Mentioned and referred to throughout the blog.

Christian Fellrath

Christian Fellrath is director of the child and adult protection services, discussed.

• Was allegedly going to investigate/respond claims brought forward, but never did.
• Tried to justify his services actions with a false court order.
• Perpetrator through commission by omission of international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse.
• Mentioned and referred to throughout the blog.

Yanick Bussy

Yanick Bussy is director of the child protection services, discussed.

• Announced an investigation into his department’s wrongdoing, which never substantiated. Both in writing and on recording.
• Perpetrator through commission by omission of international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse.
• Mentioned and referred to throughout the blog.

Sophie Neuhaus

Sophie Neuhaus the Youth Delegate director, discussed.

• Written evidence of personal contact with the child kidnapping, child sexual and psychological violence endangering mother.
• Allegedly shares (or used to share) office with Yanick Bussy
• Never personally contacted.

Sandra Joseph

Sandra Joseph is deputy director to Yanick Bussy. (No need for discussion, never met or had dealings with)

• Former lawyer, hired to help alleviate the child protection service from the accountability of excess wrongdoing legal cases.
• Never met, reputation and gossip alleging violation of children’s rights in favour of women’s claims.
• Lawyer profile link
• Public profile link

Frédéric Schallenberger

Frédéric Schallenberger is the former child protection services director and current social assistant. (To be published)

• False reports, corruption, intimidation of prosecutor, befriends perpetrators and lawyers, endangers children in child psychological and sexual abuse, disclosed intimate details of international child kidnapping and manipulation of foreign authorities in Europe and particularly France, Belgium.
• Active perpetrator violating court orders, kidnapping children, dismissing children spontaneous accounts of child sexual abuse and requests for help.

Manuela de Montmollin

Manuela de Montmollin is a social assistant. (To be published)

• False report, corruption, endangers children in child sexual abuse, disclosed scheme of international child kidnapping and manipulation of foreign authorities throughout Europe and France.

Jérôme Erard

Jérôme Erard is social assistant and substitute to Frédéric Schallenberger. (To be discussed)

• Noted down child sexual abuse and would revert back after reporting to hierarchy.
• Never heard back. Inquired at secretary, left messages, and never called back either.

Adrien Omer

Adrien Omer is a social assistant and sporadic substitute to Frédéric Schallenberger when unavailable. (No need to discuss)

• Mostly kept unaware of the cases, simply executed a task in a courteous manner.

Nicolas Jornod

Nicolas Jornod is the regional child protection office manager. (To be discussed)

• Denied any wrongdoing or corruption in false reports without any investigation.

secretaries

The child protection services secretaries are well informed of the various cases. (To be discussed)

• A few false claims, corruption and interdisciplinary collegiality.

#Rights #Whistleblower #accesstojustice #Kidnapping #Psychological #Sexual

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

KZ asked:

Sorry, where on the Children for Status website do you have the recordings? I can't find them anywhere. I asked the question because you kept mentioning you had the recordings available but I couldn't find them anywhere, so I was interested. I'm sorry you aren't being heard by the authorities.

The First source of Swiss Rights Violation recordings was posted in the beginning of June, now 3 months ago.

In the post I refer the detailed dates and times of the first source of recordings, those with my own children who are by Swiss authorities kidnapped, sexually and psychologically abused. These include several phone calls and meetings immediately prior to and/or after the kids. Accounting for in total some 427 hours.

I honestly have no idea yet how many hours the other, not yet indexed recordings span. I think I am half way through at 41 hours. That's why I have been talking about some 500 hours recordings in total.

Why recordings, and why not release them?

I started recording because of the grotesque unbelievability of what I was witnessing on one hand, and the threats by Swiss judges I was subjected to on the other hand.

There is a huge amount of material, ranging from the criminal behaviour of the Swiss schools and teachers, the child protection services, the judges, the lawyers, the doctors, the pedopsychiatrists, the police, ... You name it, I recorded it.

There is no other way to document the criminal ganging of people to hide their wrongdoing.

The recordings attest to a well oiled criminal enterprise of and by authorities and civil servants. Forget Dallas, this goes well beyond anything most sane people can ever be moved into imagining.

On several recordings you can hear how civil servants discuss their strategy to kidnap children abroad. Such as children's first names, countries, airport to use, who'll buy plane tickets, which judges are inclined and which judges less so, the central authority, involved NGO's, contracts, ... The whole strategy to kidnap children abroad and bring them under Swiss control is mapped out throughout these recordings.

And yet, despite this unalienable evidence, no one is interested.

It would be easy, wouldn't it? Just dump the several GB of data online, for people to make up their own mind. I wonder, will any private person take the time to go through the 500 hours? At a rate of 8 hours a day, non-stop every day, there is 63 days worth of material. That's without the documents...

I can understand for most people it is easier to consider it too big to fathom the possibility.

Who has the recordings?

The Swiss civil judge Yannick Jubin refused in audience to receive my USB stick, whilst the jurisprudence in Switzerland dictates he must receive it.

The Swiss public prosecutor Raphael Arn refused the recordings when I stood in front of him. He bounced back and refused to touch the recording device, yelling at me as if someone was holding him at gun point, with a recording device...

A Swiss bailiff certified the transcription of one recording as counter evidence to the 3 lawyers ganging together against me with one of their many lies. And whilst this is one recording having become an official and incontestable paper trial – evidence of lawyers Marie Berger, Jean-Marie Röthlisberger and Mathias Eusebio ganging together with the perpetrators in lies against a witness, victim and whistleblower – the public prosecutor has as far as I know never done anything to protect the children victims or myself.

The Belgian public prosecutor has received about half the recordings. He tries to refuse the case arguing that it would take too long to go through all the recordings, and denies to request the remainder of the recordings. It is hard to pinpoint a single responsible party here, as it is a different substitute signing, every time.

I have documents showing how the Swiss interfere in the Belgian justice system. Black-on white. I also have recordings of some of it. I guess that's where the Belgian public prosecutor prefers the case to be silenced, their head lies in the balance too.

That is the state of the justice system when authorities are involved in international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse. An all hands on deck need to silence the case, by whatever means, whatever the cost.

So what other reasons for not throwing just everything in bulk online, other then no single person would take the time to go through the recordings in detail like I have done (and keep doing)?

Children are named by first names. Parents are referred by “the mother”, “the father”, not their actual names. Other then the perpetrators who'd immediately be informed about which criminal acts against which children are on recording, only a public prosecutor, talented investigative journalist or private investigator could try to track down these other, to be identified children.

That's where investigative journalists come in?

Most journalists, given the sheer amount of recordings, reply “it's complicated”. Then some journalists have asked “give us the one damning explicit recording”. And when I pointed a recording, as journalists must do, the ask the judge/public prosecutor for comment, only to return:

We can't do anything. It is complicated. Different languages, several wrongdoers, several countries, such a network, …

Ultimately you get the honest answers:

• afraid of journalist career retaliation
• intimidated by the public prosecutor into fear of ending up on the accused bench themselves

Faced with a well oiled criminal enterprise which will not back down and do every criminal act (I've had a few attempts on my life), journalists are moved to think twice. One journalist was fair and square: scared for their kids.

Considering private investigators, the costs and fees associated are excruciatingly expensive. I don't have a dime other then my fingers typing the keyboard of my computer.

And I am denied access to justice in both countries whilst I have the recordings and the documents.

So what's left?

That's where I have been writing, and will keep on writing, in the context of the universal right to truth. This has long evolved from “simple” sexual abuse from a grandparent against my daughter which I have been witness of back in 2018, to large scale corruption going all the way to the highest top of Swiss society, and its criminal transnational influence.

What's astonishing, not a single criminal complaint has been filed since I divulge online. The consequence of any criminal investigation against me for the recordings or what I publish would demand for the recordings to be examined. Exactly what they do not want, because it is them, not me, who would end up in jail.

It is easier for authorities to deny access to justice, and persecute the whistleblower arbitrarily on any cheap thumb sucking fabrication under the cover of the highest judiciary not acting. Such as Arabelle Scyboz, the president of the highest cantonal judiciary, or the Swiss Federal Prosecutor, violating human rights and international instruments, making sure there is no defence made available and no investigation.

In the meantime, business as usual. Children remain psychologically and sexually abused, kidnappings can continue, and children are coerced into to authorities comforting testimonies for which the recordings as counter evidence are denied.

Filthy, disgusting, criminal, corrupt, ... there is no vocabulary suitable to describe the Swiss.

Tags: #rights #Whistleblower #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

• all international instruments and guidelines define “anyone can be a whistleblower”;
• the Council of Europe (CoE) through its conventions provides ambiguity;
• the Council of Ministers (CoM) of the CoE advocates for discrimination against and exclusion of whistleblowers;
• the European Whistleblower Directive excludes even more.

The case of Switzerland ripping off the International anti-corruption Community

Switzerland due to its monist legal system is obliged to execute international conventions. I wrote a full explanation in the post Switzerland and its cantons international obligations, and of course there is the post explaining the United Nations Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

As Switzerland's federal web site clearly underlines:

An international norm approved by Switzerland automatically becomes part of Swiss law. In the hierarchy of legal norms, in principle international law takes precedence over national law. The Federal Constitution requires the Confederation and the cantons to comply with international law.

Switzerland has an internationally recognised track record of silencing corruption, and persecuting whistleblowers. Particularly so when Swiss authorities are involved in the wrongdoing.

On April 11th I posted an overview of whistleblower persecution in Switzerland On May 8th I posted about Swiss violation of whistleblowing protection and about ... and when you thought there is no more ...

As if there are not enough impartial reports and evidence already referenced, herewith some more in the context of the current post series on the subject of states violating whistleblower international law.

Council of Europe

Switzerland joined the Council of Europe (CoE) on May 6th 1963. As a member it holds a number of influential positions in the CoE and related organs, such as:

• the chair of the CoE Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights. “It promotes the rule of law and defends human rights. It is also responsible for a whole variety of activities that make it, de facto, the Assembly's legal adviser”.
• the GRECO Bureau. It decides who the experts and country evaluation teams are, which countries are visited, and makes proposals.

Switzerland has not joined the Civil Law Convention on Corruption.

On July 1st 2006 Switzerland joined the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption; And its Additional Protocol to the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption. The declarations and reservations by Switzerland show an intention to limit wrongdoing from being prosecuted.

Just prior to that, Switzerland had been condemned at the European Court of Human Rights for violation of article 10 of the European Declaration of Human Rights in the context of reporting wrongdoing.

Switzerland has been condemned a number of times by the courts on various whistleblower related issues. Hard headed, it keeps violating whistleblowers rights.

The question is not if Switzerland violates Human Rights. The question is how whistleblowers can achieve whistleblowing in a state where access to justice is denied, whistleblowers are persecuted, and the financial-time-personal consequences linked to whistleblowing are profoundly life impeding.

Whoever blows the whistle on Switzerland is shown by Swiss authorities, without shame and in public, that your life is over.

Indeed, whistleblowers have been arbitrarily condemned and imprisoned. Swiss corruption whistleblowers suffer retaliation, repression and persecution. Trading in influence, intimidation, corruption between lawyers and the judiciary, … You name it and Switzerland has used and will use it against whistleblowers.

The CoE reports on Switzerland show a number of softer problems, such as corruption and lack of transparency in its judicial, parliamentary and electoral system. These problems were first notified in 2016, and are still ongoing. The fact of non compliance since 2007 on various issues leaves little imagination possible.

Though the CoE goes around the hardest subjects, Switzerland does not remediate the softer wrongdoing, whilst seating in important decision making CoE organs.

Bold statements and in vain promises

Transparency, corruption and whistleblowing are prime areas where Switzerland is not interested in change. Every time pressure builds up, Switzerland makes bold statements and promises in the press, its partners, and the reviewing committees of international instruments.

Switzerland does however not follow them through. In so doing it keeps ripping off the international community and deflecting its international obligations.

A simple online search will reveal a stronghold of almost constantly surfacing examples. I give you just a few:

• 2020 loophole in international standards, not acted upon.
• 2022 Suisse Secrets scandal, silenced.
• 2023 beneficial ownership transparency, not proposed to parliament before earliest sometime in 2024.

Bouldering statements end up silenced to maintain the murkiness of Swiss collegial secrecy.

Even when Credit Suisse defaults in part due to the Swiss need to silence the evidence and investigation into its ongoing holocaust wrongdoing, UBS turns it into a record profit less then a year later. More in-depth information is in the Wir haben es nicht gewusst post.

the OECD

For Switzerland the OECD Anti Bribery Convention (ABC) entered into force on July 30th 2000.

Switzerland's OECD reviews over the last 23 years trace Swiss arrogant thwarting of its OECD membership, and its obligations deriving from its voluntary accession to the Anti Bribery Convention. I wonder, how come it is still part of the OECD?

Switzerland has been left doing what it does best: deceiving its international partners to violate its international instruments obligations, without consequences or accountability. It simply continues its self esteemed superior culture of secrecy and corruption.

Switzerland has lied and mislead the OECD on multiple occurrences to obtain favourable reports and deflect criticism. The OECD hoped it would help motivate Switzerland into executing its obligations by having softer worded, motivating recommendations.

In so doing, one could interpret the promises of Switzerland as “bribing” the OECD into being less condemning of Switzerland's deliberate and full blown disdain for the organisation?

The tone changed somewhat in 2020, when Switzerland dumped to the trashcan 20 years of pretending it was working to change.

Switzerland might not fight a war with bullets, but it is fighting a war to maintain its state organised silence and corruption ethos.

I contacted the OECD Swiss reporters to find out what the consequences of the latest report of July 6th 2023 would be and what the next milestones are.

While it is in the public interest to know, the OECD have not responded. I've written twice, and by phone, they refused to comment as well. The OECD apparently does not talk to the public or Human Rights Defenders about the problem Switzerland.

There has also been no response on the request to obtain an English version of the July 6th 2023 additional follow-up report. This while it is in the public interest to know.

From public spanking of Switzerland in 2022, threatening with a high level mission by December, over softening and no mission in December 2022 based on an oral, not written (!) report by Switzerland and the expectation of a written report by June 2023, followed by a delayed, flimsy and deceitful report in July 2023, to silence. No transparency any more.

I beg to know the date and contents of the Swiss oral report, and why its contents is not made public. I beg to know why the “by June 2023” (so before June) report was delayed to July 2023. I beg to know when and how the OECD will make Switzerland accountable for its continued corrupting and ripping off the OECD.

In the name of the public interest, what's going on? And why can't we, the public, know? Is it then a matter of Swiss national security that corruption by Swiss authorities may flourish in Switzerland?

From my personal experience with the Swiss

You can read about some of my personal experiences with Swiss corruption on the blog. A small overview.

Lawyers refuse to do the necessary work afraid for their careers (on recording and in writing). Lawyers get forced by the judiciary to resign from cases. Lawyers refuse to work under the conditions the state imposes on them denying access to justice. Lawyers gang together committing gang crimes.

Civil judges threaten subjects in courts and arbitrarily dismiss evidence. Civil judges call and intimidate foreign courts and judges.

Public Prosecutors confirm it is OK to destroy evidence, and then in absence of evidence persecute the whistleblower.

Police confirms in writing being forced into signalling individuals on false grounds. Police records are truncated by those who have privileged access to police databases.

Alleged witness testimony's, who admit in their testimony to never have seen or had contact with the individual they testify against, get accepted without signature on the document. False documents get confirmed as real. Bailiff examined and confirmed recordings proving the corruption by the state get thrown out.

The Swiss are not even trying to hide their criminality. When people think of banana republic states, one must conclude Switzerland is the school example of how to be corrupt.

And then as whistleblower, you are faced with that, for the rest of your natural life?

No wonder some whistleblowers have:

• taken their lives;
• had attempts on their lives;
• fled the collaboration by the Council of Europe and Schengen zone;
• seeked asylum;
• gone into hiding, hoping they won't be found by the relentless Swiss persecution;
• …

I know of no case where those who blow the whistle on Swiss authorities are not profoundly harmed in their life.

The example of Belgium

Belgium is a party to all conventions mentioned in this post series. Due to the European Whistleblower Directive (EWD) a new, whistleblowing discriminating law was enacted in Belgium at the end of 2022.

The Federal Ombudsman Centre of Integrity (FOCI) was appointed the authority to establish who is a whistleblower in the context of this EWD inspired Belgian law, and the Belgian Federal Institute for the protection and promotion of Human Rights (FIRM) was appointed to execute the support and protections of recognised whistleblowers.

Whilst the FIRM confirmed the FOCI ought to protect and support me as whistleblower in light of international instruments, that all elements under Belgium's International obligations are present, it can not act until such time the FOCI confirms.

The FOCI chooses to restrictively interpret the EWD and Belgian law on the basis of excluding any non work related context.

According to FOCI, a stay at home parent who in the context of their career choice to take care of children, obtains unalienable evidence of state organised corruption, pay-for-contract international child kidnapping contracts from 4 countries over 6 cases involving 11 children and child sexual abuse, with child victims in need to be identified from recordings, and protected, is not a work related context.

The FOCI knowing I am without financial means to take them to court said:

Go to the court, the Belgian and EU law does not allow for us to recognise you as a whistleblower

Any argument on the basis of international instruments such as Belgium's UNCAC obligations to no avail.

The OCMW and CAW refused to confirm the necessary documents giving access to Belgium's prodeo justice system, under the pretext that it is an international and not a national issue. So the FOCI can not be sued, as they asked, for violating international law.

Under Swiss pressure and intimidation in the Belgian judicial system (as per recordings and documents) no access to justice and no protection in Belgium either.

The result is Swiss authorities continued intimidation of the Belgian judiciary, continued International child kidnappings, and the whistleblower left persecuted and aggressed, including attempt on his life which remain uninvestigated till this day.

When Switzerland decides to silence heinous crimes against children, it shows the sorry tramping of wrongdoing reporting rights, whistleblowing, by collegial CoE state authorities, in alleged Human Rights Defending Europe.

• part 1 { Whistleblowers in Europe: lawmakers reduce opportunities to report wrongdoing }
• part 2 { Whistleblowers in Europe: efforts to keep Pandora's box closed }
• part 3 { Whistleblowers in Europe: how states waltz around Human Rights }

*Tags: #Rights #Whistleblower #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

The social assistant who is supposed to ensure my children are presented in the care of the Neuchatel child protection services at 14:00 and who is violating willingly a court order was actually present according to the secretary.

The secretary informed me my children were again not presented, with no justification other then corruption by Swiss officials possible.

Of note, the messages I weekly send are done so by Signal App. It shows when they get delivered. Since August 23rd none have been delivered.

Also of note, the Magistrate's Council president is still, despite the registered letter she received August 14th 2023, denying access to justice and violating international law concerning electronic communication. Email to her address bounced again.

The ongoing Human and children's Rights violations by the Neuchatel and Swiss authorities mafia.

These criminals have no shame when it comes to their (co)perpetrating International Child Kidnapping, Child Sexual and Psychological abuse.

TO: direct perpetrators by hierarchical (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Crystel Graf, Christian Fellrath, Yanick Bussy COPY: accessory perpetrators by (hierarchical) (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Arabelle Scyboz, Martine Docourt Ducommun, Alain Ribaux, Stefan Blättler

All herewith held personally responsible for the ongoing and organised corruption and criminality in international child kidnapping, child sexual integrity violations, child psychological integrity violations, child alienation, victim protection violations, witness protection violations, whistleblower protection violations, arbitrary persecution, transnational repression, discrimination on the basis of language-origin-nationality-gender-membership of social group, denial of justice, violation of access to justice, and other human rights violations as evidenced in the 500 hours recordings and documents, gathered and published for the benefit of justice and the public at large under the universal right to truth principle.

Reiterating all previous correspondences and the demands within.

Is added to the list of child and parental human rights violations by Swiss authorities today, 06.09.2023. Are in the meantime co-responsible by omission to act all those copied to the messages.

In total 24 consecutive weeks of Swiss court ordered contact rights violations due to Swiss authorities arbitrary persecution, transnational repression and racism as per defined in international instruments.

According to the OPE secretary, Mr. Schallenberger was present at the OPE for the by court ordered appointment, but my children were once again contrary to said court order not presented in the OPE's care at 14:00. Also of concern is the messages to Mr. Schallenberger are again not delivered since at least August 23rd 2023.

I again notify:

I hold personally responsible and accountable as directors of their service Mrs. Graf, Mr Fellrath and Mr. Bussy, fully made aware of the ongoing child sexual and psychological integrity violations as well as the Bern, Geneva, Neuchatel, Jura cantonal and Swiss Federal state for these continuous acts of violence and corruption by the state and its authorities.

Under the universal right to truth, publication of the premeditated criminal acts by the Swiss authorities continues.

Should this correspondence better be addressed by a legal scholar, you are reminded articles 7 to 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and access to justice, are still violated by the Swiss authorities, including yourselves. In particular by the Neuchatel Magistrate's Council and its president violating access to justice under International Law.

Referring to the registered mail received by authorities dated August 14th 2023, June 8th 2023, and all electronic communication defined by International Law, such as email and public posting under the universal right to truth principle.

For the remainder reiterating all previous correspondences in their entirety.

Without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

Tags: #Rights #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023