I am battling with IT, unable to publish a clickable graphic page. So herewith a static picture, and this linked PDF of the picture with clickable links. Underneath the descriptions.

Crystel Graf

Crystel Graf is minister of child protection services, discussed.

• Contacted and complained to repeatedly about the chain of command silencing the corruption and criminality.
• Never acknowledged receipt other then holiday auto-replies. Never acted.
• Perpetrator through commission by omission of international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse.
• Mentioned and referred to throughout the blog.

Christian Fellrath

Christian Fellrath is director of the child and adult protection services, discussed.

• Was allegedly going to investigate/respond claims brought forward, but never did.
• Tried to justify his services actions with a false court order.
• Perpetrator through commission by omission of international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse.
• Mentioned and referred to throughout the blog.

Yanick Bussy

Yanick Bussy is director of the child protection services, discussed.

• Announced an investigation into his department’s wrongdoing, which never substantiated. Both in writing and on recording.
• Perpetrator through commission by omission of international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse.
• Mentioned and referred to throughout the blog.

Sophie Neuhaus

Sophie Neuhaus the Youth Delegate director, discussed.

• Written evidence of personal contact with the child kidnapping, child sexual and psychological violence endangering mother.
• Allegedly shares (or used to share) office with Yanick Bussy
• Never personally contacted.

Sandra Joseph

Sandra Joseph is deputy director to Yanick Bussy. (No need for discussion, never met or had dealings with)

• Former lawyer, hired to help alleviate the child protection service from the accountability of excess wrongdoing legal cases.
• Never met, reputation and gossip alleging violation of children’s rights in favour of women’s claims.
• Lawyer profile link
• Public profile link

Frédéric Schallenberger

Frédéric Schallenberger is the former child protection services director and current social assistant. (To be published)

• False reports, corruption, intimidation of prosecutor, befriends perpetrators and lawyers, endangers children in child psychological and sexual abuse, disclosed intimate details of international child kidnapping and manipulation of foreign authorities in Europe and particularly France, Belgium.
• Active perpetrator violating court orders, kidnapping children, dismissing children spontaneous accounts of child sexual abuse and requests for help.

Manuela de Montmollin

Manuela de Montmollin is a social assistant. (To be published)

• False report, corruption, endangers children in child sexual abuse, disclosed scheme of international child kidnapping and manipulation of foreign authorities throughout Europe and France.

Jérôme Erard

Jérôme Erard is social assistant and substitute to Frédéric Schallenberger. (To be discussed)

• Noted down child sexual abuse and would revert back after reporting to hierarchy.
• Never heard back. Inquired at secretary, left messages, and never called back either.

Adrien Omer

Adrien Omer is a social assistant and sporadic substitute to Frédéric Schallenberger when unavailable. (No need to discuss)

• Mostly kept unaware of the cases, simply executed a task in a courteous manner.

Nicolas Jornod

Nicolas Jornod is the regional child protection office manager. (To be discussed)

• Denied any wrongdoing or corruption in false reports without any investigation.

secretaries

The child protection services secretaries are well informed of the various cases. (To be discussed)

• A few false claims, corruption and interdisciplinary collegiality.

#Rights #Whistleblower #accesstojustice #Kidnapping #Psychological #Sexual

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

Yes, I know!

I am whistleblowing about Swiss authorities committing the deliberate and organised crimes of Child Sexual Abuse and pay-for-contract International Child Kidnapping. I have some 500 hours recordings, documents, copies of contracts. I have on recording authorities planning the kidnapping of children abroad and finding it is better to leave children from time to time with their child sexual abuser then to protect them. I lived authorities dismissing evidence and make up false evidence in order to do everything they can to keep hidden their heinous denial of child sexual abuse. I am whistleblowing about Switzerland automatically retaliating, transnationally repressing and persecuting whistleblowers. …

Yes, I know!

But what happened today just makes a fully knowledgeable, seasoned and ardent fighter for Child Sexual Abuse victims in Switzerland sick. Switzerland is a country sick beyond help. Switzerland which we all take for granted as being the highest order in Human Rights protections and the rule of law, is the most despicable, victim blaming, disrespectful country in the world. By a long shot.

The report

The report titled “Rapport concernant le projet pilote sur l'histoire des abus sexuels dans le contexte de l'Église catholique romaine en Suisse depuis le milieu du 20ème siècle“ is a work by historians.

You read that right. In Switzerland Child Sexual Abuse is examined by historians. It is not deemed a contemporary problem, but a problem of bygone era's, to be documented by historians.

In addition, it is a pilot project. Indeed, there is such disbelief Switzerland could be a nation like all other nations around the world. Remember, elsewhere 1 in 4 persons has suffered child sexual abuse in their childhood. So the Swiss figured, let's do a test and see how it goes.

Kudos to the historians who dared to take the olympic, Herculean difficult task to lead a pilot project on a subject whose existence in Switzerland is totally denied. Monika Dommann and Marietta Meier, and their team, deserve more then the gold medal.

The pilot project by the historians of Zurich University started in January 2020, and was presented today, September 12th 2023.

Three and a half years to document 1002 cases for which as historians, they were given access to certain archives of bishops.

Their conclusions are manyfold, but a few stand out. Note I have these from press clippings. I have yet to read and verify the below press outburst in the 134 pages report. It not being in English, will take me some time to verify the press said the right things:

• more boys then girls have been subject to child sexual abuse in the church
• records have been removed and destroyed
• 1002 records were examined since the 1950's
• only the tip of the iceberg according to the reporters
• given the culture of silence and non reporting, most victims never dared to speak up

Most of these conclusions had already been alerted by the CECAR, who's been silenced and budget strapped so not much could come out of it. I published about this in the post on Which Swiss NGO's should act in matters of sexual violence on children?.

The shock

Some math to help the Swiss who love numbers when it comes to wealth and profit, but despise numbers when it comes to victims.

In France, the CIASE investigated 330.000 cases for 64 million people. It was admitted there that too many victims choose not to speak, and estimated at least 500.000 victims should be remembered.

9 million people live in Switzerland. Statistically, it means in Switzerland some 45.000 victims are to be expected. Of that, the pilot project looked at 1002 cases. Let's be harsh, and round it off at 2%.

Are the Swiss prepared to take the leap into shedding light on their heinousness as other countries have done? They're in for a shocker starting at 2% …

The church speaks

While the church admits it destroyed records, it pleads guilty for the crime of widespread child sexual abuse. I admit I am surprised about the rush-of-the moment flat out mea-culpa by the Swiss church, I applaud it. It is a first not seen in any other country where the church has always tried to embellish the problem.

Maybe the dissident voices of the church have not yet spoken? Let's wait and see in the coming days.

The Basel Diocese, Bishop Felix Gmür

I reached out to the researchers as I have evidence of wrongdoing in this diocese. Allow me to publish later, once I see whether they reach out or not.

In any case, the Bishop could not be clearer in the press fully acknowledging the church's responsibility.

The minister Elisabeth Baume-Schneider speaks

And this is where I get angry. Really angry. A fine example of how in Switzerland the fish rots from the head down.

The Federal Councillor for justice, the justice minister, Elisabeth Baume-Schneider, is from the Jura.

Here is what she said:

An “alarming” but “significant” study which could bring us to action. this study is alarming, but it is also a significant step towards getting us to act.

I guess the Swiss commander in chief and its public need to think it through whether when faced with child sexual abuse it is appropriate to act or not? From experience I know they do everything to not act, until this day, regardless of 500 hours unalienable evidence.

she criticised a system “that at some point probably chose to protect the institution and the perpetrators more than the victims.

Let me tell you and confirm, I have the evidence the Swiss system systematically choses to protect the institutions and perpetrator to the detriment of victims. What disgusts most is that the report points out this culture, but the minister dares to doubt it with “probably”.

we're out of the emotional side and we have factual elements.

It characterises the total incompetence and incapability of the minister to have any empathy when faced with the most heinous crime that is child sexual abuse. Ask any child sexual abuse victim about emotion versus factual elements. Disgraceful at best.

There is now a real breeding ground on which we can work

As if civil society has not been crying out. Remember for example Incest according to Manon Schick, Mrs. Justice Minister? Wir haben es nicht gewusst!

The courts will now be able to respond to complaints or proceedings that take place as a result of this situation.

This is revolting. Switzerland's courts have been in a constitutional obligation to act for decennia. Last time I published about the monist system is no later then this morning. But the minister is right. I too call for Nuremberg to come down on Switzerland. A public parliamentary investigation into the Swiss authorities organised crime of pay-for international child kidnapping contracts and sexual abuse. But ...

we can only apologise

The minister confirms Switzerland is adamant at violating universal human rights.

• right to protection
• right to support
• right to non recurrence
• right to reparation

Err, no, you get a “we can only apologise” Sorry Mrs. Minister, your advocating against human rights leads to the conclusion you should resign.

but above all we must commit ourselves to ensuring that this is no longer possible

Probably the only “honest” part. Admitting the crime of Child Sexual Abuse is possible in Switzerland today, and that the Swiss “must commit themselves” against it.

those who have not dared to testify to find an environment where they can express themselves so that they can feel better.

WHERE? There is no where in Switzerland where victims can testify without being treated first and foremost as calumny perpetrators. There is no where in Switzerland where people may get help to feel better.

The country is devoid of professionals as per several international reports. Including the Swiss mental health industry itself, like ESPAS, admits there is a lack of adequate professionals.

So minister, unless you go deep, very deep, in your endless holocaust confiscated money pockets, and announce a full remediation programme so the competence in child sexual abuse can not only exist but be broadly, easily and financially accessibly available, you are saying to victims:

“screw you, you're on your own, deal with it yourselves, we, the state, are not going to help you, go away so we don't see you as we don't intent to help you anyway”

That, Mrs Minister, is your message to Child Sexual Abuse Victims today.

Mrs. Minister, you should be ashamed of yourself, and resign. No empathy, no recognition, no assistance for victims who you ostracise and leave to their own damaged person to deal with hurt inflicted upon them as children, silenced by authority, and alone.

Conclusion

The Swiss need to have their head looked into. Seriously.

This is no way for the highest official of a country to deal with a societally silenced and denied pandemic which is so big it is impossible to keep it unacknowledged. Yet the Swiss being interdisciplinary collegial at silence, no wonder omerta among authorities perdures. To then keep going the stigmatisation and dismissal of victims of child sexual abuse is criminal. And there is International law which constitutionally must be executed.

Violations of the Lanzarote convention. Violations of the Convention one the Rights of the Child and its optional protocol. Violations of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Violations of the European Declaration of Human Rights.

No, seriously, this lady's disrespect for victims of the most heinous crime, and the law, is totally unfit for office, and needs to step down.

The country is reputed for its cows and cheese. Today it is yet again showing its real face: a country of sheep mended by wolves who will not hesitate to kill any victim voice, and feast on its cadaver as example for all sheep to never dare to speak up against deliberate state organised wrongdoing in Child Sexual Abuse.

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Whistleblower #Kidnapping #Psychological

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

The use of buzz-words like discernment and consent revolves around concerns. Whether legitimate or not, their alleging forms the basis of excuses in our pigeonholing societies. The old adage of grasping extreme differences into homogenous categories everyone can understand and deal with. It is about variation and diversity versus convenience for courts and society. Yet the younger, the greater these disparities durably impact lives.

Do we need it? Do we need an “age of consent”? Or are we better off with anarchical concepts interpreted on an ad-hoc, case by case basis? Which criteria and definitions would, or should, we use? On what would we base them?

The law mixing up inquisitive exploration, discernment, consensualness, and all elements of criminal nature is clearly incapacitated to provide an easy, child centred answer.

neurology to the rescue

Neurological science has proven we are not “adult” until well into our twenties. Objective research, such as brain scan imagery, shows by age 18, the usual legal adult age, we are about half way in our neurological development from puberty to adulthood. A quick search will reveal the amount of confirming research on the subject.

Risk taking and dealing with risk taking consequences, our capacity to inhibit impulses or deal with influence, and more, are not fully developed at 18. Whether we like it or not, this involves and influences at least our psychological and sexual capacities. It usually takes until about our mid twenties to reach that point, but there is great individual variability in timing.

Children will inevitably explore and experiment sexual behaviour long before the end of development. During that time, various forms of influence, or worse, create victims who sustain life-long measurable neurological damage.

Who's responsible?

To me the question is not whether the age of biological ability to procreate, or an alleged age of any kind, should be used. Age should not come into the picture. The question to me is how those who are further on their path of life could (want to) take responsibility for those who are less so?

In many if not most child sexual abuse cases, victims have had to show, prove, to authorities there was unwarranted influence, abuse. In families, children who try to speak up most often are not heard, nor listened to.

Is that how we want a child, regardless of age, to start dealing with life-long far reaching measurable damage?

Who's responsible when a 15 year old child explores sexuality with a 14 year old? Do we consider it consensual because neither seems at that time to suffer from the experience? Do we punish the elder child, or try to establish which of both is the furthest developed? Or do we commit gender based violence by defaulting responsibility to the boy regardless of his development? …

None of any of these in my opinion.

Parents, family, the close circle of trust are responsible …

Who's responsible seems easily defined in the face of child sexual abuse. The parents, and the child circle of trust, are responsible, no? Yet if it would be easy, wouldn't child sexual abuse not exist?

Even parents fall prey to omission to act in favour of their child victim. For example by adults willing disbelief, generating life-long child sexual abuse consequences. I've published an open letter to my recently passed away aunt because it is I think an example of the responsibility of families.

Pictures and movies can capture and convey the spirit in ways scribbles can't. While it takes stomach, I invite everyone to watch the 2018 movie “les chatouilles” showing the childhood experience of artist Andrea Bescond. The movie was translated to English, titled little tickles. It is an exemplary example of how families may deal with Child Sexual Abuse.

A trailer of the movie can be watched on invidious.'

For me the movie was an eye opener on a politically incorrect truth. Mothers too are responsible for child sexual abuse. And the increasing data suggests women are no better then men at the subject.

In 2020 Kristin Jones as victim offered an inspirational ted talk: Why children stay silent following sexual violence.

Yes, some of the data she refers to might not be entirely up-to-date or correct. And there are a few gender discriminations creeping in there. But that's not important. Her sharing of her personal experience is an example testimony of what happens among the 90% of child sexual abuse cases, and sheds light on what needs to change.

So what should we do?

Wrongdoing will happen in the group of peers, among children. Repression against children is not the answer. Support, awareness and reparation are.

Based on the neurological evidence, the law should seek to increase the age of consent. As far as I am concerned, at least to 18 if not higher. The duly necessary exceptions to the law, acknowledging children's exploration, should render the age of consent wholly dependent on three pillars:

• objective assessment there is discernment
• establishment there is absence of elements of abuse such as influence and coercion
• exclusively within the group of peers

Surprise: International law and jurisprudence already allows for much of this “flexibility” concerning consensual sexual conduct in the group of peers. It is just we do not apply nor use it because no law can assess the individual level.

Only people who are truly competent and experienced can try to provide a personal opinion assessment. And there is a chronic lack of them, everywhere. And it is in the nature of people to make mistakes. Expert mistakes are as human as unpardonable in matters of Child Sexual Abuse.

In time, I am confident law will acknowledge neurology to determine whether an individual is of age of consent or not. Much like it has the capacity to objectively determine who has been victim of child sexual abuse, and who is falsely accusing.

my thoughts

Child sexual abuse has been part of humanity since times immemorial, and will remain part of our societies no matter what we do or wish to counter it. It doesn't mean it is not our duty to work and act against it.

The first change is how we all look at and deal with child sexual abuse.

Our adult culture and praxis of ego, honour, shame, silencing, ... being valued as more important then a child's needs being dealt with appropriately, must be stopped.

We don't need to teach children. We need to teach adults, parents and the close circle of trust in particular. Adults need to learn appropriate communication on the subject. Among themselves and towards children. An atmosphere of non judgement as a warm, secure, trustworthy blanket. In this way, also false allegations of children can be dealt with in a sane and future life constructive way.

Stand by children victims and children perpetrators. And particularly stand up against adult set ways and perpetrators. No matter the age consideration. And realise since as a society we condemn sexual abuse between adults, shouldn't we start with addressing sexual violence against and among children with as much fervour?

end of part 2 of this 2 part series

• part 1 { the era of age and sexual consent: the problem }
• part 2 { the era of age and sexual consent: a path to solution }

A shorter edited version is also available at HAVOCA.

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Psychological

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

Wednesday the Magistrate's Council replied to the week 20 denunciation of rights violations by authorities.

What is the Magistrate's council?

You can find the details directly on their web site.

The Conseil de la magistrature is the supervisory authority for judicial authorities and magistrates. It ensures that the judicial system functions properly. It is responsible for the administrative supervision of the judicial authorities and the disciplinary supervision of members of the judiciary.

It is the Magistrate's Council (CM) responsibility to make sure the judicial system works properly, to supervise the judicial authorities and take disciplinary action when things break horribly down. It is supposed to examine violations brought to its attention.

This includes overseeing the judiciary does not violate Human Rights, International Instruments, Swiss or cantonal laws.

If there is corruption among the system, the CM is responsible and supposed to take the necessary action too.

What has the Magistrate's Council been duly made aware of?

Every email the CM has received has indicated violations of:

• access to justice, which is a fundamental and universal Human Right as per the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and many other international instruments;
• jurisdiction attribution;
• the United Nations Convention Against Corruption by repression, retaliation against and persecution of whistleblower;
• failure to protect, and endanger, witness and victim rights, including children.

In addition the CM has been duly informed of:

• corruption among its ranks
• destruction of evidence by the judiciary

Arabelly Scyboz (ASC) and the CM of which ASC is president are fully aware of these violations, which fall under their authority to investigate and remedy, and have in full knowledge, deliberately, failed to address.

In a Human Rights violation aggravating move, ASC has banned electronic correspondence, repeatedly. In so doing she violates not only access to justice, she violates the very rules on which a properly functioning judiciary is based. The judiciary rules of electronic communication.

We've published in the 4 part series about how the Swiss judiciary authorities violate international law on electronic communication.

Commission by omission: child sexual abuse

Both international instruments and Swiss law foresee any Swiss authority to whom's attention has been brought child abuse is obligated to act, even if there is no obvious or apparent evidence of it.

In light of the CM and ASC being fully aware of the existence of recordings as evidence of the heinous crimes, and the fact they dismiss their responsibility, there is at least commission by omission of child sexual abuse by the CM and its president.

Wednesday's answer by the Magistrate's council

The Wednesday received answer of the CM is quite something:

• Lying to a non legal scholar civilian about the CM responsibilities;
• defamation of a victim-witness-whistleblower seeking assistance and protection;
• and threatening a victim with retaliation and repressive action.

Let's start with the email and its internet translation.

Sir, We would ask you urgently to cease your as numerous as ill-timed correspondences to the magistrate's council and directly to Mrs Scyboz. Neither are involved or competent to give any kind of response. We hope that our letter will be followed up in order to avoid us being obliged to consider taking other provisions or measures.

Let's get into the message bit by bit.

... numerous ... correspondences

The amount of Human Rights violations by the Swiss judiciary are “numerous”. Every week new violations, of which it is my duty to inform them.

The magistrate's council as you know get 1 email per week. Not more. And the only reason they receive an email is the non addressing of Human Rights violations.

As such, the Numerous correspondences claim is nothing short of defamation, attacking the victim-witness-whistleblower, who they have a duty, unalienable obligation, to protect.

... Ill-timed correspondences ...

It is not because the CM has potentially been on holiday that the Human Rights violations which they need to be informed of have stopped. Are they suggesting during their holidays they should not receive correspondences concerning Human Rights Violations?

If so, no auto reply or other information was received from the Magistrate's Council. Other authorities did have autoreplies.

Or would it mean Human Rights violations by the judiciary are OK when the CM is on holiday? Let's not be silly here.

I conclude it is nothing short of defamation geared towards the person who dares standing up for rights instead of geared towards the Human Rights violating perpetrators in the judiciary.

to the magistrate's council and directly to Mrs Scyboz

Should I understand ASC secretary is not aware their boss illegally banned the receiving of denunciations concerning issues of their responsibility?

It is a severe Human Rights violation to ban access to justice, particularly by the highest judiciary authority who should be fully aware of the rules.

Bullying in an attempt to divert responsibility of the correspondence banning by Swiss authorities should one day the public scrutiny call for their accountability?

Neither are involved or competent to give any kind of response.

Blatant and deliberate lie to deceive and bully a non legal scholar civilian. Issues are, as indicated higher in this post, their responsibility to deal with. It says so on their web site.

The highest judicial authority seeking to dismiss responsibility by lying to civilians is a heinous human rights violation. Seeking to cover up the non working of the system in this way will only aggravate the crimes they have so far collegially committed by deliberate omission to investigate.

We hope that our letter will be followed up in order to avoid us being obliged to consider taking other provisions or measures.

Let me rephrase in the non jargon language of regular people.

“If you don't shut up, we're going to do something, which we're not telling you what, to you”

You read this right. This is the highest judicial authority issuing a threat to a non legal scholar civilian – victim, witness, whistleblower – seeking access to justice and protection from judicial corruption and deliberate wrongdoing.

It is the kind of scene having its place on kids playgrounds. Not in a place of judicial authority.

Magistrate Council obligations

It is the CM obligation to denounce the heinous crimes of the system it is chief of, and provide protection from ongoing:

• denial of access to justice;
• illegal judgements and court proceedings;
• corruption;
• organised pay-for-contract child kidnapping from 4 countries;
• sexual abuse of children;
• psychological abuse of children;
• repression, retaliation against and persecution of whistleblower;

And more...

The refusal to denounce and provide protection, and the lying and threatening by the CM is no other then an effort to cover up the state's active involvement in criminality and corruption.

You can not claim Switzerland would be a civilised Human Rights and rule-of-law respecting nation, whilst its highest judicial authority leads the example of wrongdoing. In any civilised society, this sort of behaviour is punishable by law. In Switzerland, I am certain, the cover-up machine is desperately in full swing.

I've said it before and I reiterate: it is the Swiss national sport to violate Human Rights and persecute those who dare to point Swiss authorities wrongdoing.

I reiterate, should there be any doubt, having some 500 hours of recordings and documents as evidence to substantiate what I write about. I appreciate that must hurt Swiss authorities ego.

I appreciate the Universal Right to Truth is not something the Swiss are akin to, nor that they respect their country's international obligations under international law.

Those who have followed the blog will know by now: I will not stop until such time those authorities responsible for heinous Human Rights violations are held accountable, and the Universal Right to Truth prevails.

Feel the heat? Understand why they scramble to lie, repress, retaliate and persecute those who dare speak up? There's plenty more to come ...

P.S.: I'll most probably not respond to the email before Monday, there's something happening behind the scenes which I can't yet talk about. Maybe Monday. Suspense ...

Tags: #Rights #Whistleblower #Sexual #Psychological #Kidnapping #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

The report underlines Switzerland's:

• Cantons are problematic and responsible for violating children's rights;
• data collection and access is virtually non existent, harming transparency and Human Rights;
• ongoing refusal to have a government watchdog capable of receiving and examining complaints from the public;
• discrimination is part of its DNA, and Swiss law does not provide to condemn it;
• incorrect interpreting what is “the good of the child”;
• improper dealing with violence against children and their protection in law and in praxis, because its child protection professionals, including judges and psychologists, lack competence;
• as one of the wealthiest countries in the world unwillingness to tackle widespread child poverty within its borders;
• violating one of the most basic human rights, access to justice, also for children;
• inaction in the field of child sexual abuse;
• disrespect for other Human Rights instruments, and has to learn working with the CoE.

The CRC line-up of Swiss problems have many documented examples, from personal experience, already published on the blog. It is interesting to see that Switzerland is not, as people may claim and believe, a civilised and human rights respecting country. The United Nations CRC evaluating and reviewing Switzerland over years confirms Switzerland is problematic at best.

For those interested, what follows is a copy-paste of various items from the report in more detail.

Swiss Cantons are problematic and responsible for violating children's rights:

The Committee recommends that the State party ensure the compatibility of cantonal legislation with the Convention, and develop a child-rights impact assessment procedure for national legislation and policies relevant to children. Ensure that such a policy provides guidance for cantons on implementing the Convention, and includes a special focus on groups of children in vulnerable situations, including ... migrant children and children without a regular residence status.

Swiss data collection and access is virtually non existent, harming transparency and Human Rights:

The Committee remains seriously concerned that the collection and analysis of data on the situation of children is fragmented and inconsistent across cantons, and that there is no centralized system of disaggregated data collection or data on certain groups of children in disadvantaged situations. Ensure that data is also collected and analysed on violence against children, including ... domestic and intercountry adoptions; missing children; and the situation of children in disadvantaged situations, including children in alternative care, ... migrant children, children without a regular residence status and children of incarcerated parents.

Switzerland's ongoing refusal to have a government watchdog capable of receiving and examining complaints from the public:

The Committee ... regrets that the office will not have a mandate to receive and investigate complaints from children. The Committee reiterates its previous recommendations and further recommends that the State party: (a) Expeditiously establish the ombudsman for children’s rights with a mandate to regularly monitor and evaluate progress at both the federal and cantonal levels in the fulfilment of children’s rights under the Convention and to receive, investigate and address complaints from children in a child-friendly manner; (b) Ensure that independent mechanisms for human rights monitoring have adequate human, technical and financial resources to implement and monitor the application of the Convention; © Ensure full compliance with the principles relating to the status of national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights (the Paris Principles).

Discrimination is part of its DNA, and Swiss law does not provide to condemn it:

the Committee is concerned about de facto discrimination against children in disadvantaged situations, ... and that discrimination on all explicit grounds covered under the Convention, including sex, disability or socioeconomic or other status, is not prohibited under article 261 bis of the Criminal Code. The Committee recommends that the State party: (a) Ensure that all forms of discrimination, including on the basis of sex, disability and socioeconomic, residence or other status, are prohibited by law; (b) Ensure the full implementation of relevant laws prohibiting discrimination, including ... adequately sanctioning perpetrators, and removing procedural barriers that prevent child victims of discrimination from accessing justice and receiving remedies; (d) ... addressing the root causes of de facto discrimination, with a view to eliminating discrimination against children in disadvantaged situations, including ... migrant children ... and socioeconomically disadvantaged children.

Switzerland incorrectly interprets what is “the good of the child”:

The Committee remains concerned that the concept of “the good of the child” in the Constitution does not correspond to the principle of the best interests of the child enshrined in the Convention, and has contributed to the insufficient implementation of the principle of the best interests of the child in decisions affecting children. Recalling its previous recommendations, the Committee recommends that the State party: (a) Ensure that the principle of the best interests of the child is consistently applied in programmes and administrative and judicial proceedings, including in relation to parental custody, placement in alternative care, and migration and asylum procedures; Develop operational procedures or protocols for professionals working with and for children to ensure that due weight is given to the views of children in all proceedings.

Switzerland improperly deals with violence against children and their protection in law and in praxis, because its child protection professionals, including judges and psychologists, lack competence:

The Committee ... notes that the training provided to relevant professional groups is not systematic and that knowledge of children’s rights among such professionals remains insufficient. The Committee recommends, in line with its previous recommendations, that the State party: (b) Ensure systematic training on children’s rights and the Convention and the Optional Protocols thereto, including through the allocation of sufficient resources, for all professionals working for and with children, in particular those working in the areas of education, health, child protection, social protection, alternative care, justice and asylum. Ensure that laws on access to information and the digital environment, including the federal data protection law, ensure respect for children’s right to privacy, protect children from harmful content and materials and online risks, and provide for mechanisms to prosecute violations; © Enhance the digital literacy and skills of children, teachers and families, and protect children from information and material harmful to their well-being. Strengthen coordination among cantonal authorities and child protection specialists to implement multisectoral measures for the prevention and intervention of violence against children, and adopt indicators to monitor progress achieved in the prevention of violence and in combating factors underpinning violence against children at home, in school, in alternative care settings and within a child’s circle of trust; Strengthen efforts, including through increased human, technical and financial resources, to train professionals concerned to identify and adequately respond to cases of violence and child abuse, including psychological abuse, and establish reporting guidelines. Allocate adequate financial, technical and human resources for mental- health services and programmes to ensure that the number of qualified medical professionals, including child psychologists and psychiatrists, is sufficient to meet children’s mental-health needs in all cantons; (b) Strengthen measures to support health authorities to better diagnose mental-health problems among children

As one of the wealthiest countries in the world Switzerland is unwilling to tackle widespread child poverty within its borders:

The Committee notes that the Federal Council is responsible for regular poverty monitoring but is concerned that the overall level of children living in poverty remains high, a situation that could be further exacerbated by the coronavirus disease (COVID- 19) pandemic, and that some children without a regular residence status or Swiss citizenship do not apply for social assistance as it may negatively affect their residence permit status. Taking note of target 1.2 of the Sustainable Development Goals, the Committee recommends that the State party: (a) Further strengthen its policies to ensure that all children have an adequate standard of living throughout its territory; The Committee is concerned about the disparities between Swiss-born children and asylum-seeking, refugee and migrant children in completing upper secondary education, disparities between cantons regarding access to education, and the high rate of children who have experienced bullying in schools. Drawing attention to targets 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.a of the Sustainable Development Goals, the Committee recommends that the State party

Switzerland violates one of the most basic human rights, access to justice, also for children:

(b) Ensure the full implementation of relevant laws prohibiting discrimination, including ... adequately sanctioning perpetrators, and removing procedural barriers that prevent child victims of discrimination from accessing justice and receiving remedies; Broaden the conditions under which an official legal defence may be appointed for children facing criminal charges, with a view to ensuring that effective legal representation is provided, free of charge, to all children who need it;

Switzerland is inactive in the field of child sexual abuse:

Adopt a comprehensive policy and strategy to implement the Optional Protocol, including measures aimed at strengthening cooperation among responsible authorities and ensuring early identification, recovery and social reintegration of child victims of sexual exploitation;

Switzerland disrespects other Human Rights instruments, and has to learn to work with the CoE:

The Committee recommends that the State party continue to cooperate with the Council of Europe on the implementation of the Convention and other human rights instruments, both in the State party and in other Council of Europe member States.

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Psychological #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

This time Mr. Schallenberger, the by court appointed social assistant, was present at his office. The secretary connected the call.

Mr. Schallenberger refused to indicate whether my children had been brought in his care at 14:00 as per the court order. In an aggravating monologue on his behalf, totally unable to listen or hear anything, he disconnected the conversation threatening I would not get to see or speak or have any contact with my children until I would subject to his personal interrogation.

This social assistant has no mandate or authority to interrogate me. His mandate is to ensure my children are presented at 14:00 in his care, and if they are not, it is child kidnapping.

I called again. The secretary refused to confirm whether my children were present or not as per the court order and terminated the call.

I called again, Mr. Schallenberger picked up the phone. This time he confirmed my children had not been presented at 14h in his care as per the court order. He also informed that my children would not be presented in his care as per the court order until such time I would submit to his interrogation, and terminated the call.

Twice threatened by one of the perpetrators, mr. Schallenberger, who is one of: – the international child kidnappers (I have him on recording organising the kidnapping of other children from France); – those who does non assistance of children in danger of sexual abuse (he has dismissed my children's spontaneous saying they are abused when the mother was present and I was not); – those who takes part in the alienation of children (apart from the ongoing contact rights violations, he has heard my children spontaneous telling him in my presence about the psychological alienating tactics of the mother).

All this and more on recording.

Coming back to today, Human Rights and Swiss court order are once again violated.

In addition I as victim have been threatened by a perpetrating Swiss authority. Transnational repression, retaliation and persecution for daring to denounce corruption and criminality by authorities.

These statements, including heinous crimes by Swiss authorities, can be proven by the recordings. Including today's three telephone conversations.

Naturally I wrote, copy below. And as per in weeks past the highest judiciary authority, Arabelle Scyboz, is still blocking from being duly informed of criminality.

Copy of the message:

09.08.2023 Continuation of Swiss authorities organised criminality and violations of human rights TO: direct perpetrators by hierarchical (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Crystel Graf, Christian Fellrath, Yanick Bussy COPY: accessory perpetrators by (hierarchical) (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Arabelle Scyboz, Martine Docourt Ducommun, Alain Ribaux, Stefan Blättler

All herewith held personally responsible for the ongoing and organised corruption and criminality in international child kidnapping, child sexual integrity violations, child psychological integrity violations, child alienation, victim protection violations, witness protection violations, whistleblower protection violations, arbitrary persecution, transnational repression, discrimination on the basis of language-origin-nationality-gender-membership of social group, denial of justice, violation of access to justice, and other human rights violations as evidenced in the 500 hours recordings and documents, gathered and published for the benefit of justice and the public at large under the universal right to truth principle.

Reiterating all previous correspondences and the demands within.

Is added to the list of child and parental human rights violations by Swiss authorities today, 09.08.2023. Are in the meantime co-responsible by omission to act all those copied to the messages.

In total 20 consecutive weeks of Swiss court ordered contact rights violations due to Swiss authorities arbitrary persecution, transnational repression and racism as per defined in international instruments.

As every week a message was again sent today at 14:00 to Mr Schallenberger. As usual no response came and around 14:15 I called.

This time Mr. Schallenberger was present at his office. The secretary connected the call.

Mr. Schallenberger refused to indicate whether my children had been brought in his care at 14:00 as per the court order. In an aggravating monologue on his behalf, totally unable to listen or hear anything, he disconnected the conversation threatening I would not get to see or speak or have any contact with my children until I would subject to his personal interrogation.

I called again. The secretary refused to confirm whether my children were present or not as per the court order and terminated the call.

I called again, Mr. Schallenberger picked up the phone, confirmed my children had not been presented at 14h in his care as per the court order. He also informed that my children would not be presented in his care as per the court order until such time I would submit to his interrogation, and terminated the call.

Human Rights and Swiss court order are once again violated, in addition I as victim have been threatened with future continued violation of rights by your perpetrating, criminal and corrupt authorities. These statements, including heinous crimes by your authorities, can be proven by the recordings.

The conversations, disconnections and threats by the authorities as expressed today are also on recording.

All in copy to this correspondence are duly informed, and as such co-responsible for the ongoing rights violations.

I again notify:

I hold personally responsible and accountable as directors of their service Mrs. Graf, Mr Fellrath and Mr. Bussy, fully made aware of the ongoing child sexual and psychological integrity violations as well as the Bern, Geneva, Neuchatel, Jura cantonal and Swiss Federal state for these continuous acts of violence and corruption by the state and its authorities.

Under the universal right to truth, publication of the premeditated criminal acts by the Swiss authorities continues.

Should this correspondence better be addressed by a legal scholar, you are reminded articles 7 to 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and access to justice, are still violated by the Swiss authorities, including yourselves.

For the remainder reiterating all previous correspondences in their entirety.

Without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested.

Tags: #Rights #Whistleblower #Sexual #Psychological

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

Who is Christian Fellrath?

Christian Fellrath (CF), is the director of the SPAJ, the Neuchatel cantonal adult and child protection service. CF is directly reporting and taking orders from the Councillor Crystel Graf (CG). YB & SN both take their orders from CF.

CF's whole career, since 1991, has been at the SPAJ, and he's been in director positions since 1998, first as head of what today is called the OPE, then since 2001 as director of the SPAJ.

there'll be a CF, YB, FS line-up of interferences in a later post

As supreme director of the department, for almost 23 years, CF holds responsibility for prevention, promotion and protection of children issues, as well as for attending to adults in difficulty. The SPAJ is also responsible for things like specialised child institutions, adoptions and foster care.

CF is a person around who there is very little transparency. CF does not have a profile page on the Cantonal official web site as is would be normal for a public servant of his high level responsibility.

CF is an expert at sending out dependent disciples, people who work for and depend on him for their livelihood, into positions where public disclosure of all mandates is required for the public's interest to have scrutiny. In this way, there is no scrutiny of his conflicts of interests. CF is not “officially” known to federal institutions, but he is there holding the puppets.

I'll give you a fun example: page 28 of the CFEJ 40 year celebration wish card shows the message of the official CFEJ representative SN discussed earlier. Notice how CF is the only cantonal director co-signing alongside the representative? In fact, it is the only co-signed message...

For some reason, he has managed to be a publicly unseen eel holding power of decision. (I use eel for this alliteration, since a snake you can catch with your both hands whereas an eel, forget it)

A broader internet search in the face of complete lack of transparency is bound to be incomplete. But it can point directions.

CF holds cantonal parliamentary positions:

• Groupe de travail chargé de la coordination interdépartementale de la politique sociale (GTCIPOS)
• Commission de Santé Mentale
• Commission du guichet sécurisé unique

Just like YB, the controller and controlled are one and the same.

From a previous post we know the SPAJ (co)represents the Neuchatel Central Authority on the latin cantons Federal Body of Child Adoptions, the CLACA, on which board CF has been member for over two decades, and at times president.

As Neuchatel Central Authority, CF has been on trips like Haïti and the Dominican Republic, representing the Neuchatel Canton authorities alongside the Swiss Federal Central authority. It is a rough job I am sure...

CF holds a plethora of mandates in various child related private foundations and associations. Such as (but not limited to):

• Neuchatel Red Cross (NRC) (there is an important link with the mother and the NRC director, more on that later)
• Adoptons-Nous, an adoption association openly linked to the SPAJ
• Pro Enfance, a privately funded national childhood action think-tank with a host of activities normally executed by SPAJ
• Fondation F.-L. Borel, private child in difficulty boarding and foster care institution.
• Fondation Carrefour, particularly with its AEMO (Action Educative en Milieu Ouvert) social assistants acting as private subcontractor for SPAJ care and protection responsibilities. There is a link to Xavier Humair, problematic school director, and the Services Social International Suisse lawyer Jean-Marie Rothlisberger. Both will be discussed at length in a separate topic.
• Les Billodes where CF is strangely representing the ministry of justice! This whilst the problematic (former) judge Isabelle Bieri, about who there will be a completely separate topic later, is also sitting on the council. The web site has been taken offline for me, so I have an archived PDF.

And quite frankly, there is so much more conflict of interest and interdisciplinary collegiality, read mafia, tying people's omerta up in the canton of Neuchatel you'd be blue in the face, if you are not already.

This Neuchatel Canton, and its authorities, are truly amazing. An open air museum with living relics of medieval vassalistic mob reality. The sad part is, it is ongoing and endangers children in plain sight.

The lack of official transparency on any person of authority is a problem to the public interest and scrutiny. As various UN documents alert, such lack of transparency is the source of much governmental criminality and corruption.

I invite you to keep searching the net. You can puzzle together CF holds important positions in various child related foundations and public authority decision making positions. And there are many documents and decisions of his hand mentioned in parliamentary work, of which only a very few can be traced.

Any Neuchatel whistleblower feeling like sending “le liver noir de la coparentalité”, an internal SPAJ working document arguing policy against co-parenting, is welcome to do so. Reach out on Twitter, or by email, which you'll find on this page.

Next post I'll blow the whistle on CF in the context of a foundation ... and a Child Sexual Integrity Violation ... And then finish off on a final CF post ... child kidnapping and endangerment. As they say in slang: he's a piece of work.

Series on Christian Fellrath, director of the Adult and Child Protection Services:

• part 1 { the ghost of child and adult protection services }
• part 2 { the failing of initiatives against child abuse }
• part 3 { (child) sexual violence parliamentary commission: canceled }
• part 4 { Incest according to Manon Schick}
• part 5 { What's the fuss about not bringing children to a court order about?}

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Psychological #Kidnapping

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

I suggest to go through the introduction of this topic.

Who is Yanick Bussy

YB is the chief of the OPE, the Neuchatel Child Protection Office. The OPE competences are described by law as being:

• Signalling children in need of protection to the APEA;
• Perform social enquiries as ordered by administrative and/or judicial authorities;
• Perform mandates by the judicial authorities;
• Propose, execute and follow-up child foster situations;
• Collaborate with administrative authorities, schools, institutions and partners concerned with the protection of minors;
• Inform, advise, council et support persons who consult their services in relation to child protection;
• Examine and suggest prevention measures.

Each and every by law indicated responsibility of the OPE is violated by the services of YB's office, including himself being personally aware of the violations and not doing anything to remedy.

It is strangely bewildering since YB has a bachelor's degree in psychology and in law.

He of all people is supposed to have the “qualities” to know when children are in danger, and at the same time know international law we've been discussing at length throughout the various topics of the blog.

While YB's information is not transparently or easily available in order for the public to be able to scrutinise his position for conflicts of interests, YB sits on various parliamentary commissions.

He is first and foremost a politician. I list those I could find which will be shown in later posts as conflicts of interests or trade in influence, underlining the criminality and corruption of the Neuchatel authorities:

• the Commission de santé scolaire (School Health commission);
• the Commission consultative de conseil et d’expertise en matière de pédagogie spécialisée (Specialised Education commission)
• the Commission technique en matière de lutte contre la violence domestique (Domestic Violence commission)

So YB seats in some of the parliamentary commissions where his OPE may be subject to scrutiny. The to be controlled who controls himself in the name of the public, so to speak. Democracy in one of its corrupt iterations, wouldn't you agree?

YB has also taken part in the 2018 Neuchatel parliamentary public hospitals working group Pour deux hôpitaux sûrs, autonomes et complémentaires and its report. I'll remember you about this when we'll discuss the role of the Neuchatel hospitals medical and legal personnel in the omerta, inter alea, of the lesions to the sexual organs of my children.

And lastly, he (co)represents the Neuchatel Central Authority on the latin cantons Federal Body of Child Adoptions, the CLACA.

YB confirmed investigation ... that never happened

Between September 2020 and January 2023 YB as head of the OPE received a total of 14 correspondences denouncing various acts by his team and violation of obligation to protect incidents.

This list excludes the Swiss court order violations by his team which I have been publishing about.

YB can not claim he is not fully aware of the evidence against his OPE concerning the: – CSIV (such as child sexual abuse) – CPIV (such as parental alienation, psychological abuse) – organised child kidnapping by his office – involvement and responsibility of his personnel

He acknowledges reception in his responses. dd. May 23rd 2022 he announces he has received the various elements and is conducting an investigation.

We acknowledge receipt of your e-mail dd May 9th concerning the follow-up of your children's case, CENSORED, within the Child Protection Office. The various elements set out in your email are currently being analysed in order to provide the most favourable response. We will send you a detailed reply as soon as possible

Throughout my correspondences I underlined I was available and wished to meet him, with the evidence. He never requested.

By chance, during his public appearance 6 months later I bumped into YB during a reception following the round table on parental consensus which was held on November 24th 2022.

When I pointed him to the fact his investigation report was long overdue, he got angry, and said agitated:

It is not because you have not received a report or have not been requested to submit information/evidence that I am not doing anything. I personally committed to you receiving this report, and you will receive it in due time.

YB doesn't know I was recording everything he said... ouch!

The only way to prove what I say is true in the face of criminal authorities is to record, as proclaimed repeatedly by the European Court of Human Rights as being the duty of an individual facing corrupt authorities.

Until this day, the promised report is still ... under YB's personal supervision?! And one must believe the investigation is being conducted ... extensively thoroughly?! Today is day 436 since he announced it. Wouldn't you agree to expect one hell of a report on the criminality and corruption in his department? But how would he do this without requesting the evidence I have?!

He's not the worst of the OPE-SPAJ lot, I assure you. Most probably, he's subject to walk the line expected of him by what the Swiss call “collegiality”, which in any other normal country is called mafia praxis.

In any case, he can not claim he is not aware, and so as head of the department he is at least responsible for commission by omission in serious child abuse and criminal matters.

Oh and Wednesday = Swiss authorities violating Swiss court order day

Same as last and every week for 19 consecutive weeks now. Mr. Bussy whose personnel and department are explicitly appointed in the Swiss court order, as silent and criminal as ever, violating the court order.

Next I'll peel (like an onion, layer by layer) as much as possible the big boss, SPAJ's Christian Fellrath. Maffia, anyone?

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Kidnapping #Psychological

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

Throughout the “legal” posts you've been seeing a sample of the amount of Swiss people of “authority” having either direct criminal (co)responsibility, or committed by omission to act.

Who's who in the child protection services?

To make sense of the “interdisciplinary collegiality” and which authorities bear responsibility, the organigram of the Département de la formation, de la digitalisation et des sports (DFDS), whose minister is Conseillère d’État Crystel Graf (CG), will be most helpful. CG is the minister of education, digitalisation and sports.

Under CG's department falls the Service de protection de l'adulte et de la jeunesse (SPAJ), the Neuchatel child and adult protection services.

The SPAJ director is Christian Fellrath (CF), who's allegedly taken his senior position back in 2001 and does not have an official page.

The SPAJ has 4 departments, of which the three of importance are:

• The Office de Protection de l'Enfant (OPE) whose director is Yanick Bussy (YB)
• The Office de Protection de l'Adulte (OPA)
• The Délégué à la jeunesse (DJ) whose director is Sophie Neuhaus (SN)

Follows the discussion of each one of them.

Sophie Neuhaus

SN allegedly shares (or shared) an office with YB, the chief of the OPE. They both work under CF, the chief of the SPAJ.

SN has been working for the federal authorities in child related competences for the longest time. First at the Swiss National Youth Council (SNYC), and now also at the Federal Commission for Childhood and Youth (CFEJ).

Founded in the 1930s, the SNYC is now established as the umbrella organisation for more than 60 youth organisations in Switzerland, representing more than 500,000 children and young people. The SNYC pursues the main goal of acting as a voice for the interests of Swiss youth on a political and public level. To achieve this goal, the SNYC initiates and develops various projects within its central areas of an engaged youth, our future and the inclusion of all.

The CFEJ advises on child and youth policy issues. As a specialised commission, the CFEJ plays an important role in the political handling of social issues. It provides specific interdisciplinary knowledge in the field of children and youth policy, which the federal authorities can refer to when necessary.

As a federal commission, the CFEJ members are obliged to divulge their other interests, for public scrutiny. The Federal web site page for CFEJ links to its members other interests. Err, that is a broken link as you will notice ... So no checking who's who and what their potential conflicts of interests may be. Are we surprised? Me being me, I digged it up. Here it is: https://www.admin.ch/ch/f/cf/ko/interessenbindung_8006.html

As you can see, SN has been very transparent (sarcasm) in her interests divulging. Not only she has “Aucune Indication” (no indication) next to her potential conflict of interests, she “forgot” to mention as her main job she is working as the Neuchatel DJ !

Let's have a closer look at the “interdisciplinary” nature of SN's “no indication” of (potential) conflicts of interests...

• Conférence pour la politique de l’enfance et de la jeunesse (CPEJ) where she seats together with her boss, CF.

The CPEJ works to ensure the application of children's rights and the development of child and youth policies in Switzerland (protection, promotion, participation), as well as the coordination between the cantons. The CPEJ is a technical conference of La Conférence des directrices et directeurs cantonaux des affaires sociales (CDAS). CDAS is the conference of cantonal directors in social matters. It promotes cooperation between the cantons and contributes to the harmonisation of social policy.

• Conférence romande des délégué-e-s à l’enfance et à la jeunesse (CRDEJ)

The cantonal youth delegates collectively defend the interests of children and young people and promotes a pro-active policy in this area. They make their expertise available to the various political authorities and institutions and take a stance on issues relating to children and youth. Where appropriate, they collaborate with other institutions involved in the promotion of children and youth at cantonal, national or international level.

• Plateforme de lutte contre le surendettement (Neuchâtel).

The Neuchatel platform to combat excessive debt. Working for the Conseillère d'État Florence Nater, Département de l'emploi et de la cohésion sociale (DECS) here ... The minister of employment and social cohesion.

• commission de promotion de la santé (Neuchatel)

The committee's role is to advise on health prevention and promotion, ensuring an interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral vision that reflects the realities on the ground. Working for the Conseiller d'État Laurent Kurth, Département des finances et de la santé (DFS) here ... The minister of Finance, Health, statistics and ... the church.

The perpetrator (mother) works in health, and personally knows SN as evidenced in various email exchanges.

The Swiss sure like it complicated with a lot of titles and “interdisciplinary” ties, which they don't ever consider “conflicts of interests”, don't they?

I don't know what you think, but one person working for 3 cantonal ministers and for the federal government and in civil society at the same time ... No, there naturally can't be any “interdisciplinary” ... collusion?

Over the next days the others will face the scalpel. If we get lucky digging up a few documents I'm still looking for ... juicy ...

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Psychological

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

Today, some of the responsible authorities being on holiday, auto replies are generated confirming reception. I wish them to spend good time with their children. How would one do that while being duly informed to hold personal responsibility for other children undoubtedly spending their holidays in sexual and psychological violence, and further alienated.

Secretary of the Grand Council, the parliament, of the Neuchatel canton “Votre message nous est bien parvenu et a retenu toute notre attention. Il sera traité dans les meilleurs délais.” Received and will be dealt with in the shortest possible time. Really? Week 17 since the first occurrence.

Alain Ribaux, the Councillor (minister) of, among others, justice. “Durant mon absence, vos messages ne sont pas déviés et ne seront pas relevés régulièrement.” Really, we're week 17 ...

Crystel Graf, the Councillor (minister) of, among others, electronic transition and child protection. “Je suis absente jusqu'au mercredi 2 août 2023. Vos messages ne sont pas déviés.” Really, week 17 ...

For those wondering, their secretary email address does also get the communication, not that that would change the slightest bit.

Obviously, as per on-and-off weeks documented previously, Arabelle Scyboz, the president of the Magistrate's Council, the highest judicial authority of the canton, does not want to be informed, blocking communication from my email address.

As always, copy of the message addressed to the authorities is below. Tomorrow, further lifting the veil of the corruption between these people.

To: Christian Fellrath christian.fellrath@ne.ch,Yanick Bussy yanick.bussy@ne.ch,Conseil Magistrature conseil.magistrature@ne.ch,Arabelle Scyboz arabelle.scyboz@ne.ch,Rechtsdienst rechtsdienst@ba.admin.ch,Info info@ba.admin.ch,Chancellerie Etat chancellerie.etat@ne.ch,Severine Despland severine.despland@ne.ch,Secretariat Gc secretariat.gc@ne.ch,Martine Docourtducommun Gc martine.docourtducommun.gc@ne.ch,Crystel Graf crystel.graf@ne.ch,Secretariat Dfds secretariat.dfds@ne.ch,Alain Ribaux alain.ribaux@ne.ch,Secretariat Desc secretariat.desc@ne.ch,Secretariat Djsc secretariat.djsc@ne.ch,Secretariat Pjne secretariat.pjne@ne.ch

Subject: 19.07.2023 Continuation of Swiss authorities organised criminality and violations of human rights

TO: direct perpetrators by hierarchical (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Crystel Graf, Christian Fellrath, Yanick Bussy COPY: accessory perpetrators by (hierarchical) (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Arabelle Scyboz, Martine Docourt Ducommun, Alain Ribaux, Stefan Blättler

All herewith held personally responsible for the ongoing and organised corruption and criminality in international child kidnapping, child sexual integrity violations, child psychological integrity violations, child alienation, victim protection violations, witness protection violations, whistleblower protection violations, arbitrary persecution, transnational repression, discrimination on the basis of language-origin-nationality-gender-membership of social group, denial of justice, violation of access to justice, and other human rights violations as evidenced in the 500 hours recordings and documents, gathered and published for the benefit of justice and the public at large under the universal right to truth principle.

Reiterating all previous correspondences and the demands within.

Is added to the list of child and parental human rights violations by Swiss authorities today, 19.07.2023. Are in the meantime co-responsible by omission to act all those copied to the messages.

In total 17 consecutive weeks of Swiss court ordered contact rights violations due to Swiss authorities arbitrary persecution, transnational repression and racism as per defined in international instruments.

According to the OPE secretary, Mr. Schallenberger was not present at the OPE for the by court ordered appointment, and my children were once again contrary to said court order not presented in the OPE's care at 14:00.

I again notify:

I hold personally responsible and accountable as directors of their service Mrs. Graf, Mr Fellrath and Mr. Bussy, fully made aware of the ongoing child sexual and psychological integrity violations as well as the Bern, Geneva, Neuchatel, Jura cantonal and Swiss Federal state for these continuous acts of violence and corruption by the state and its authorities.

Under the universal right to truth, publication of the premeditated criminal acts by the Swiss authorities continues.

Should this correspondence better be addressed by a legal scholar, you are reminded articles 7 to 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and access to justice, are still violated by the Swiss authorities, including yourselves.

For the remainder reiterating all previous correspondences in their entirety.

Without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested.

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Psychological #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023