What is child sexual abuse?

The “Interagency Working Group on Sexual Exploitation of Children” published in 2016 the “Terminology guidelines for the protection of children from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse“. The “Luxembourg Guidelines” as they are commonly called were drafted by an informal collaboration between various independent experts and international organisations, such as the UN Special Representative to the Secretary General on Violence against Children; the UN Special Rapporteur on Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography; ECPAT International; Council of Europe; UNICEF; …

In the guidelines, experts have examined thoroughly what child sexual abuse is and is not. I think everyone should read it fully. I find it even should be part of school curriculum at an appropriate age. You’ll find there are many things which still today are commonly found to be “normal” in our societies, but in reality are child sexual abuse. Herewith a few important parts:

“Incest” refers to the sexual activity between two people who are very closely related in a family.

“Rape” is the crime of forcing someone (in this case a child) to have sex without the consent of the victim. “sexual assault” broadens the scope of the crime to include also sexual acts that do not involve penetration.

“Molestation” refers to the act of touching or attacking someone, especially a child, in a sexual way.

“Sexual touching of children”. Sexual touching of a child is a form of sexual abuse. “To touch” means to physically put hands on something or someone, and the term “sexual touching of children” mainly refers to the act of touching the private parts of a child’s body, and/or making the child touch her or his own private parts, for the purpose of one’s own sexual arousal/gratification. It includes any physical contact, including touching through clothing, as well as direct contact with the other person’s skin. The sexual abuse of children frequently occurs as repeated episodes that become more invasive with time. Perpetrators usually engage the child in a gradual process of sexualizing the relationship over time. Sexual touching often marks, along with sexual comments, the beginning of a gradually increasing process of sexual abuse of the child by an adult or by another child. For that reason, it may represent a crucial stage of intervention to avoid further, and more serious, sexual abuse of the child.

“Harassment” refers to the act of “annoying or worrying somebody by putting pressure on them or saying or doing unpleasant things to them”. The Istanbul Convention defines “sexual harassment” as any form of unwanted verbal, non-verbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature with the purpose or effect of violating the dignity of a person, in particular when creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating, or offensive environment. “Unwanted sexual comments” can be a form of sexual harassment. The process of sexual abuse may include or even start with unwanted sexual comments on, for instance, the way the child is dressed or is using make-up or on her/his physical beauty, thus embarrassing the child. While such comments do not always lead to sexually abusive activities, they may still cause harm to the child, and may be considered a form of non-contact abuse.

the UN sais …

The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) being a broad spectrum convention, does not mention much Child Sexual Abuse. Only articles 19 and 34 mention it, softly. I condense the essence:

The state shall undertake to protect and prevent and support. The protective measures should, as appropriate, include effective procedures … for identification, reporting, referral, investigation, treatment and follow-up … for judicial involvement.

There is no defining who should act, in the fields of identification, reporting, referral, investigation, treatment, follow-up and judicial involvement.

No sweat, the Committee on the Rights of the Child did on 18 April 2011 in its General comment No. 13: The right of the child to freedom from all forms of violence. More then 12 years ago, in an extensive and detailed way. States have had plenty of time to put things in place, wouldn’t you agree? Read further in this topic what interpol says …

Identification: requires that all who come in contact with children are aware of risk factors and indicators of all forms of violence, have received guidance on how to interpret such indicators, and have the necessary knowledge, willingness and ability to take appropriate action (including the provision of emergency protection). Children must be provided with as many opportunities as possible to signal emerging problems before they reach a state of crisis, and for adults to recognize and act on such problems even if the child does not explicitly ask for help.

Reporting: includes:
(a) providing appropriate information to facilitate the making of complaints;
(b) participation in investigations and court proceedings;
© developing protocols which are appropriate for different circumstances and made widely known to children and the general public;
(d) establishing related support services for children and families; and
(e) training and providing ongoing support for personnel to receive and advance the information received through reporting systems.
Reporting mechanisms must be coupled with, and should present themselves as help-oriented services offering public health and social support, rather than as triggering responses which are primarily punitive. Children’s right to be heard and to have their views taken seriously must be respected. In every country, the reporting of instances, suspicion or risk of violence should, at a minimum, be required by professionals working directly with children. When reports are made in good faith, processes must be in place to ensure the protection of the professional making the report.

Referral: The person receiving the report should have clear guidance and training on when and how to refer the issue to whichever agency is responsible for coordinating the response. Following this, intersectoral referrals may be made by trained professionals and administrators when children are found to be in need of protection (immediate or longer-term) and specialized support services. Professionals working within the child protection system need to be trained in inter-agency cooperation and protocols for collaboration. The process will involve:
(a) a participatory, multi-disciplinary assessment of the short- and long-term needs of the child, caregivers and family, which invites and gives due weight to the child’s views as well as those of the caregivers and family;
(b) sharing of the assessment results with the child, caregivers and family;
© referral of the child and family to a range of services to meet those needs; and
(d) follow-up and evaluation of the adequateness of the intervention.

Investigation: Investigation of instances of violence, whether reported by the child, a representative or an external party, must be undertaken by qualified professionals who have received role-specific and comprehensive training, and require a child rights-based and child-sensitive approach. Rigorous but child-sensitive investigation procedures will help to ensure that violence is correctly identified and help provide evidence for administrative, civil, child-protection and criminal proceedings. Extreme care must be taken to avoid subjecting the child to further harm through the process of the investigation. Towards this end, all parties are obliged to invite and give due weight to the child’s views.

Treatment: “Treatment” is one of the many services needed to “promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration” for children who have experienced violence, and must take place “in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child” (art. 39). In this respect attention must be given to:
(a) inviting and giving due weight to the child’s views;
(b) the safety of the child;
© the possible need for her or his immediate safe placement; and
(d) the predictable influences of potential interventions on the child’s long-term well-being, health and development.
Medical, mental health, social and legal services and support may be required for children upon identification of abuse, as well as longer-term follow-up services. A full range of services, including family group conferencing and other similar practices, should be made available. Services and treatment for perpetrators of violence, especially child perpetrators, are also needed. Children who are aggressive towards other children have often been deprived of a caring family and community environment. They must be regarded as victims of their child-rearing conditions, which imbue them with frustration, hatred and aggression. Educational measures must have priority and be directed to improve their pro-social attitudes, competencies and behaviours. Simultaneously, the life conditions of these children must be examined in order to promote their care and support and that of other children in the family and neighbourhood. In terms of children who harm themselves, it is recognized that this is a result of severe psychological distress and may be a result of violence by others. Self-harm should not be criminalized. Interventions must be supportive and not in any way punitive.

Follow-up: The following must always be clear:
(a) who has responsibility for the child and family from reporting and referral all the way through to follow-up;
(b) the aims of any course of action taken – which must be fully discussed with the child and other relevant stakeholders;
© the details, deadlines for implementation and proposed duration of any interventions; and
**(d) mechanisms and dates for the review, monitoring and evaluation of actions.
**Continuity between stages of intervention is essential and this may best be achieved through a case management process. Effective help requires that actions, once decided through a participatory process, must not be subject to undue delay. The follow-up must be understood in the context of article 39 (recovery and reintegration), article 25 (periodic review of treatment and placements), article 6, paragraph 2 (right to development) and article 29 (aims of education which present intentions and aspirations for development). Contact of the child with both parents should be ensured in accordance with article 9, paragraph 3, unless this is contrary to the best interests of the child.

Judicial involvement: At all times and in all cases, due process must be respected. In particular, the protection and the further development of the child and his or her best interests (and the best interests of other children where there is a risk of a perpetrator reoffending) must form the primary purpose of decision-making, with regard given to the least intrusive intervention as warranted by the circumstances. Furthermore, the Committee recommends the respect of the following guarantees:
(a) Children and their parents should be promptly and adequately informed by the justice system or other competent authorities (such as the police, immigration, or educational, social or health-care services);
(b) Child victims of violence should be treated in a child-friendly and sensitive manner throughout the justice process, taking into account their personal situation, needs, age, gender, disability and level of maturity and fully respecting their physical, mental and moral integrity;
© Judicial involvement should be preventive where possible, proactively encouraging positive behaviour as well as prohibiting negative behaviour. Judicial involvement should be an element of a coordinated and integrated approach across sectors, supporting and facilitating other professionals to work with children, caregivers, families and communities, and facilitating access to the full range of child caregiving and protection services available;
(d) In all proceedings involving children victims of violence, the celerity principle must be applied, while respecting the rule of law.

In Short:

1. All who come in contact with children must have the necessary knowledge, willingness and ability to take appropriate action.
2. They are required to receive and advance the information received through reporting systems.
3. Professionals are required to report instances, suspicion or risk of violence.
4. Reports must be referred to whichever agency is responsible for coordinating the response.
5. It must be investigated by a trained and qualified professional.
6. A full range of services, such as medical, mental health, social and legal services, must be provided.
7. The whole process must be clear and must be fully discussed in detail with the child, family and other relevant stakeholders.
8. The judicial system must protect the child, prevent recidivism and coordinate with all involved.

I admit I particularly loved reading:

Criminal law procedures, which must be strictly applied in order to abolish the widespread practice of de jure or de facto impunity, in particular of State actors; Disciplinary or administrative proceedings against professionals for neglectful or inappropriate behaviour in dealing with suspected cases of child maltreatment (either internal proceedings in the context of professional bodies for breaches of codes of ethics or standards of care, or external proceedings)

Several other documents relate to who must do what. I only reference here the UN resolution 2005/20 Guidelines on Justice in Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime.

Its key points are:

• protect witnesses and children from any influence or retaliation;
• restrain contact with perpetrator;
• foresee in assistance by professionals.

the European Directive on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography

The directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, says states must. But for the remainder much remains optional.

Member States should encourage any person who has knowledge or suspicion of the sexual abuse or sexual exploitation of a child to report to the competent services. It is the responsibility of each Member State to determine the competent authorities to which such suspicions may be reported. Those competent authorities should not be limited to child protection services or relevant social services. The requirement of suspicion ‘in good faith’ should be aimed at preventing the provision being invoked to authorise the denunciation of purely imaginary or untrue facts carried out with malicious intent.

To ensure successful investigations and prosecutions of the offences referred to in this Directive, their initiation should not depend, in principle, on a report or accusation made by the victim or by his or her representative.

Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that investigations into or the prosecution of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7 are not dependent on a report or accusation being made by the victim or by his or her representative, and that criminal proceedings may continue even if that person has withdrawn his or her statements.

Reporting suspicion of sexual abuse or sexual exploitation 1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the confidentiality rules imposed by national law on certain professionals whose main duty is to work with children do not constitute an obstacle to the possibility, for those professionals, of their reporting to the services responsible for child protection any situation where they have reasonable grounds for believing that a child is the victim of offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7. 2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to encourage any person who knows about or suspects, in good faith that any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7 have been committed, to report this to the competent services.

Any person is only encouraged to report to the competent services, and those services have the possibility, not the obligation, to report taking into consideration their belief. Investigation or prosecution does not depend on a report or accusation by the victim or its representative.

It really is poor in that it gives professionals the possibility to not report, to keep quiet. Professionals should be the first to have to speak and report, not those with an option to do so.

Since the EU directive is much less stringent then the UN’s convention, the UN’s convention takes precedence in those countries party to the UN convention. Professionals as such have an obligation to act, regardless of what the EU directive said.

the Lanzarote convention

The European Directive above is pretty much a repackaged version of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse.

However, in its Explanatory Report the Council of Europe tries to increase pressure on the obligation to report.

1. Under paragraph 1 Parties must ensure that professionals normally bound by rules of professional secrecy, (such as, for example, doctors and psychiatrists) have the possibility to report to child protection services any situation where they have reasonable grounds to believe that a child is the victim of sexual exploitation or abuse. Although in many member States systems of mandatory reporting are already in place, and are considered to be crucial in detecting abuse and preventing further harm to children, the Convention does not impose an obligation for such professionals to report sexual exploitation or abuse of a child. It only grants these persons the possibility of doing so without risk of breach of confidence. It is important to note that the aim of this provision is to ensure the protection of children rather than the initiation of a criminal investigation. Therefore, paragraph 1 provides for the reporting possibility to child protection services. This does not exclude the possibility provided in certain States to report to other competent services.

Well, The Council of Europe has work to do to come in line with the by the UN defined obligations. For now, professionals can keep quiet under the Lanzarote convention. Until then, the UN’s being more stringent, it remains the benchmark of who has to act.

Child Sexual Abuse by “omission” (bias) to act

I’ll let wikipedia do the job. Omission bias:

Omission bias is the phenomenon in which people prefer omission (inaction) over commission (action). People tend to judge harm as a result of commission more negatively than harm as a result of omission. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights establishes how basic human rights are to be assessed “without distinction of any kind”. Distinctions often are the basis for omission bias.

Individuals and authorities can facilitate and encourage Child Sexual Abuse by the ease with which it can be performed. They commit Child Sexual Abuse by omission.

Omerta in families, often based on honour and shame, or simply through a refusal to believe a (trusted) person can be a predator. A matter of perceived credibility which initiates omission.

The perceived benefit of the doubt complications, and the need for the maintenance of status to hide the complete lack of competence of services, authorities, the legal and/or the political system are basis for the countless Child Sexual Abuse commission by omission acts.

Together they make up the various levels of a state, who bears the ultimate responsibility in international law instruments for ensuring Child Sexual Abuse commission by omission can not happen. And yet, it is the state making sure it does happen.

Interpol confirmed in a press communiqué on 13 April 2023:

(countries) lack the specialized staff, skills and resources needed to effectively investigate cases, … conduct victim identification, and safeguard children.

No one acts. In doing so they either commit Child Sexual Abuse by omission, or take an active part in the act of committing.

To what point then do these institutions define November 18th as the day to call upon the subject of Child Sexual Abuse?

P.S.: The readers have spoken. This platform is too difficult to navigate and the information is scattered around. I've been in the process of reworking the blog on a different platform so it is easier to navigate and find the relevant information according to one's interest. Writing and posting organically is one thing, the technical stuff for easy access to information is something else...

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

While they had by phone conceded they would get back to me as soon as possible, it is only today, 130 days later, that a reply arrived. And the reply does not actually address the problem.

On June 15th I asked:

In the name of transparency for publicly recognised Non Governmental Organisations I would like to know the links and/or partnerships between Missing Children Europe and the International Social Service, as well as the links between the national Missing Children partners and national members of the International Social Service. Can you please clarify any links, and contractual agreements, between organisations? Thank you.

Their answer today goes on questioning how 4 months ago the Google services integration on their web site blocked anyone whose firewall blocks Google services from accessing the MCE web site.

They do not respond, clarify, provide transparency as to the nature of their intra-organisation contracts or collegial ties, nor how these may affect and contribute to International Child Kidnapping and Child Sexual Abuse not being investigated.

As those who follow the blog know, I have recordings, documents and contracts of their Swiss partners active involvement in both kidnapping and sexual abuse of children. This includes how transnational and interdisciplinary collegiality (mafia) gets in the way at their Belgian chapter. How their organisation(s) do not perform their legal duties under international law and their child protection policy as a consequence. And how they are funded by perpetrators to be instrumental in the kidnapping and abuse of children.

But importantly, I can not help but notice on Sunday I wrote the the Belgian Parliamentary Investigation Commission on Child Sexual Abuse, highlighting the organisation, and 2 days later out of the blue an email arrives.

If you look at the timeline:

• June 15th email to MCE
• June 17th published MCE research
• October 22nd email to commission
• October 25th MCE responds, without addressing the issue

Of course this is pure coincidence?

I responded to today's by MCE received correspondence as follows:

June 15th 2023 notification of transparency access request on: >> the links and/or partnerships between Missing Children Europe and the International Social Service, as well as the links between the national Missing Children partners and national members of the International Social Service. Can you please clarify any links, and contractual agreements, between organisations? << No reply to date. 130 days. Missing Children Europe still has the duty to transparency. The questions remain unanswered, and not addressed in your below response.

They might get addressed by the Parliamentary Investigation Commission, or they might respond. In any case, the dice are out there, just waiting to see how they're going to be dealt with, and by who.

*Tags: #Rights #Kidnapping #Sexual #Accesstojustice *

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

Time for a little round-up on the ongoing Wednesday's Swiss court order violations by Swiss authorities, as introduction to the wider picture, and the upcoming Swiss elections.

On October 4th Crystel Graf's (the minister responsible for child protection and electronic communication) autoreply confirmed once again good reception of the correspondence denouncing the court order and human rights violations committed by her department. She has, as usual, still not taken responsibility. This has been ongoing for at least 30 weeks.

On October 11th, the ongoing court order violation. Children were not presented to the child protection services. Mr. Schallenberger who is responsible for making sure children are presented at 14:00 in the child protection care not even being at the office.

On October 18th Mr. Schallenberger was according to the secretary of the child protection services on holiday. No information had been provided beforehand. Accounting for week 30 of Swiss court order violations by the Swiss child protection services.

Arabelle Scyboz, still listed as the president of the Magistrate's Council which is the judiciary supervising authority, is still violating international and Swiss law on electronic communication and allowing the corruption by the judiciary she is responsible of. She is still banning electronic communication denouncing the heinous human rights crimes committed under her ultimate responsibility, and still denying access to justice.

All of this is possible under the watchful eye of the parliamentary judiciary commission. Their secretary is in copy of the various denunciations. Its president, Céline Dupraz, responded once, on May 8th, confirming:

sa mission de haute surveillance

Its mission of high surveillance of the judiciary, and …

respecter la séparation des pouvoirs

It prefers to respect the separation of powers then investigate the ongoing heinous human rights violations committed by the judiciary it is supposed to be the high surveillance authority of.

Basically the Parliamentary Commission who is supposed to scrutinise the methods and proper working of the judiciary in the interest of the public, says the judiciary can continue to be corrupted and commit human rights crimes.

The president of the parliament, currently Martine Docourt Ducommun, identically fully informed, has never responded or acted.

Nor has the minister of justice and currently acting prime minister, Alain Ribaud, ever responded or acted.

That in Switzerland the fish rots from the head is well documented throughout the +130 posts on the blog. Above is only a succinct overview.

The public who is voting these politicians into power has a universal right to truth about their state officials involvement in some of the worst human rights crimes, and actively helping for those crimes to be covered up. It is more then just monkeys “don't hear, don't see, don't speak” commission by omission to act.

Would you vote for a politician when you know of unalienable evidence of ongoing human right crimes, particularly against children, co-perpetrated and covered-up by those in power?

the veil of democracy and the rule of law used to validate corrupt votes

Under a veil of imposed silence it is the Swiss authorities who ensure the denial of the universal right to truth. The public and the press are terrorised and do not dare to speak up for fear of their authorities retaliating. Reminiscent of the German “wir haben es nicht gewusst” syndrome under the rule of the second world war Gestapo.

Being witness and having evidence to that, I open an additional chapter in my whistleblowing on Swiss authorities corruption. Why would I keep being scared to fully speak up, remain quiet, in the face of the Swiss wishing me dead and do everything to it anyway. Including attempts on my life.

It so happens that due to my privileged position I can document how the fraud in recent votes in Switzerland was organised. With the evidence I have, I can not attest the end result would have been different, but I can attest to systematic electoral fraud.

I can also attest to the prosecutor, Raphael Arn, having to investigate the electoral fraud while being under influence and manipulated. He has to function in his little village of Moutier, which claims the through electoral fraud obtained status of metropolitan city of the Jura. At some 7000 inhabitants, it surely is a joke. Those who follow the blog will recognise Raphael Arn's name from the child sexual abuse cases, and the documented transcantonal influence and threats by authorities he is under, to let child sexual abusers continue their perpetration against children.

I have it on recording, no wonder he did not want the recordings when I presented him the recordings. No wonder he has never acted on the by him received registered mail indicating his office's violations of various human rights.

You see in Switzerland, in light of any kind of wrongdoing, an independent outsider is not used to investigate. A local, subject to local pressures of interest, is used.

Corruption is second nature to the Swiss. Any government official in power has to take an active role in it. The Swiss even have a fancy name for their deliberately organised wrongdoing. They call it “interdisciplinary collegiality”.

Switzerland acclaims its status of superior democracy by ensuring its controllers are locked in this “interdisciplinary collegiality”. Being it the controllers of the parliament, of the judiciary, of the police, of the medical profession, ... all are subject to the same fancy worded mafia get along and shut up praxis.

Bring on the SLAPP's

Due to my eye problems, I've had the luxury of talking on the phone to a few Swiss whistleblowers over the last weeks. People who had the courage to denounce Swiss wrongdoing.

Not one of them knows any whistleblower who has not been persecuted by Swiss authorities. They all suffer SLAPP's – Strategic lawsuits against public participation - and human rights violations in Swiss authorities mostly successful attempts to silence whistleblowers, and allow for corruption to prevail.

The Swiss public believes firmly in their superiority. How can they otherwise when the press, the fourth power, can not speak up under threat of legal action and undue influence of prosecutors into what may and may not get published. The various Swiss journalists I talked to, evidence at hand, are all afraid of one thing: being SLAPP-ed.

As an example, in Switzerland, a criminal complaint alleging calumny takes precedence over any other criminal activity being performed. First the calumny is examined, only if the judiciary decides there is no calumny after years of proceedings, then the criminal activity may be possibly looked into. By then the combination of statute of limitations and destruction of evidence all account for a return to … calumny. Because if they can not condemn the wrongdoing due to the destruction of evidence and/or statute of limitations, well it must be calumny after all.

And for calumny proving, all tools are used. False witness statements, wrong translations, falsified documents, abuse of power, bribery, …

Another Swiss national sport is violating its international obligations under the United Nations Convention Against Corruption and the OECD Anti Bribery Conventions.

Swiss are so infiltrated in those organisations that whenever the international controlling organisms show a pointing finger at Switzerland, as per the OECD example, a simple alleged verbal report suffices to silence the reporting on Switzerland's wrongdoing.

Let me put that in layman's terms: Go to dinner, have a meal, and a pinch of intimidation and threats, and all is wrapped in silence.

In Switzerland, democracy and the rule of law are mirages. The ego of the perpetrators is more important then what they themselves call the “superior interest of the state in the manifestation of the truth”, or combatting corruption.

To the Swiss, the only truth that matters, is making sure no one dares to speak up against corruption, or be warned of the far reaching retaliation, transnational repression, persecution, including attempts on life.

The amount of illegally, without trial, detained people in Swiss prisons on the basis of daring to speak up against corruption is astonishing. Those who spoke up against wrongdoing and before being locked up arbitrarily decide to flee the country face life-long transnational repression and persecution.

Any access to foreign authority positions is abused by the Swiss, for example like I documented in the illegal SIS-II database usage. Which appears to be a systematic abuse in Swiss whistleblower cases.

The renaissance of the methods of the likes of the Nazi, the Khmer Rouge, the Junta, … is happening in Switzerland. The only difference is these human rights violating regimes came to power on the basis of a series of political and economic crises, whilst in Switzerland it happens with the hidden stolen wealth accumulated by these criminal regimes as collateral.

so who are the Swiss voting for coming Sunday?

In absence of the press, the fourth power, legal ability to report Swiss authorities wrongdoing to the public, and in presence of interdisciplinary collegiality disease throughout the controlling of Swiss authorities, I'll let you decide on how you think the Swiss elections will turn out.

I forecast it will be a team of same-old-same-old with a sprinkle of newly controlled interdisciplinary collegial individuals. Some shuffling of positions, and on the country goes for another 4 years of political and judicial corruption galore.

I already extend the invitation to all the world's pedophiles and child kidnappers: flock to Switzerland. The federal minister participates in the denial of child sexual abuse disease in the country, and Swiss kidnapping authorities have their international child kidnapping dictator uninvestigated for over 3 years now. Really, if you are an international child kidnapper or a child sexual abuser, the Swiss will treat you with welcoming reverence, and make sure your wrongdoing never gets actioned against, for if it should even only be mentioned, you have the superior calumny and other human rights violating weapons of mass silencing at your fullest disposal. Including the omerta'd parliament.

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Kidnapping #Accesstojustice #Whistleblower

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

This week, an auto reply confirming Crystel Graf is not at the office. A confirmation the email will not be read until she returns to office next week, which is once again an implicit confirmation she receives the weekly correspondences about her department's responsibility. If her system acknowledges, so can she, and she must act. Given she never responds and chooses to never act, Crystel Graf along with the others commits by omission to act international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse.

Arabelle Scyboz, the Magistrate's Council chief in command who's responsibility it is to make sure the judiciary works as it should, is still against international law also denying electronic communication.

One could jokingly speak of a banana republic, or a failed state. But this is simply corruption canker in the country of omerta: Switzerland.

Below copy of the weekly denunciation of Swiss authorities court order violations and child endangerment email.

TO: direct perpetrators by hierarchical (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Crystel Graf, Christian Fellrath, Yanick Bussy COPY: accessory perpetrators by (hierarchical) (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Arabelle Scyboz, Martine Docourt Ducommun, Alain Ribaux, Stefan Blättler

All herewith held personally responsible for the ongoing and organised corruption and criminality in international child kidnapping, child sexual integrity violations, child psychological integrity violations, child alienation, victim protection violations, witness protection violations, whistleblower protection violations, arbitrary persecution, transnational repression, discrimination on the basis of language-origin-nationality-gender-membership of social group, denial of justice, violation of access to justice, and other human rights violations as evidenced in the 500 hours recordings and documents, gathered and published for the benefit of justice and the public at large under the universal right to truth principle.

Reiterating all previous correspondences and the demands within.

Is added to the list of child and parental human rights violations by Swiss authorities today, 04.10.2023. Are in the meantime co-responsible by omission to act all those copied to the messages.

In total 28 consecutive weeks of Swiss court ordered contact rights violations due to Swiss authorities arbitrary persecution, transnational repression and racism as per defined in international instruments.

According to the OPE secretary, Mr. Schallenberger was not present at the OPE, and as such unavailable for the by court ordered appointment, and my children were once again contrary to said court order not presented in the OPE's care at 14:00. The delivery confirmation of messages to Mr. Schallenberger remain hit-and-miss, and messages remain without any justification for the 28 consecutive weeks of court ordered contact rights violations.

You might keep silent in the face of your violations of your international law obligations, it does not change the contents of the 500 hours recordings and documents evidencing the heinous crimes of pay-for-contract international child kidnapping, deliberate endangerment and known psychological and sexual integrity violations of children by your offices, committed by your administrations.

By not acting in the protection of witness, victim and whistleblower and not protecting children from further sexual and psychological abuse, you are all personally responsible for commission by omission of crimes.

I again notify:

I hold personally responsible and accountable as directors of their service Mrs. Graf, Mr Fellrath and Mr. Bussy, fully made aware of the ongoing child sexual and psychological integrity violations as well as the Bern, Geneva, Neuchatel, Jura cantonal and Swiss Federal state for these continuous acts of violence and corruption by the state and its authorities.

Under the universal right to truth, publication of the premeditated criminal acts by the Swiss authorities continues.

Should this correspondence better be addressed by a legal scholar, you are reminded articles 7 to 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and access to justice, are still violated by the Swiss authorities, including yourselves. In particular by the Neuchatel Magistrate's Council and its president violating access to justice under International Law.

Referring to the registered mail received by authorities dated August 14th 2023, June 8th 2023, and all electronic communication defined by International Law, such as email and public posting under the universal right to truth principle.

For the remainder reiterating all previous correspondences in their entirety.

Without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested.

Tags: #Rights #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

The EU has used a different approach. The EU used real world case scenario's and asked mystery shoppers, individual people, to try and see what the reality is like on the ground. So the EU report is a more realistic, real world account, based on experience.

Before we delve into things, let's be clear. Between the Swiss self assessment in 2018 and the report released this week, there are a few years, during which one would expect the country to improve, not regress. Therefrom stems additional confirmation the Swiss lied to their CoE partners.

the Swiss in Europe digital maturity map

It immediately shows in easy to understand colouring something is wrong in Switzerland.

the Swiss patting their back: good job!

The Swiss federal bureau of Digital Administration (L'Administration numérique suisse) (BDA) :

coordinates the steering of digital transformation between and within the various institutional levels, and enables the stakeholders concerned to express their views and participate in decision-making. It creates added value for the population, the economy and public administrations, and encourages collaboration between all levels of government. (Translation)

The BDA's press release on the EU eGovernment Benchmark 2023 report goes on listing the great achievements by Switzerland, whilst having to admit it overall ends 29th place out of 35. In reality, Switzerland went from 28th position last year to 29th position this year. Whilst the average of all countries shows fulfilment of electronic society obligations at 70%, Switzerland contends with 57%. On average.

A few basic factsheets from the report can be found here.

the skeet

On Bluesky famous Swiss journalist Eric Guevara-Frey skeeted on September 21st how fantastic and modern the Swiss public services are, stating it took him 6 minutes from request to obtaining his shiny new passport.

the numbers

In the various documents you can see Switzerland's position among the 35 country report:

• 7th worst in digital maturity of government; Only 17% of Switzerland's online services meets the EU basic criteria!
• 5th worst in transparency of government; It is among the countries deemed to not respect transparency in delivering services, or using personal data, of citizens. Let alone what they do with non-citizens.
• 2nd worst in family life; Only Montenegro does worse.
• shares 10th worst in electronic communication with Greece.

A few more numbers:

electronic communication

Switzerland is the 10th worst country when it comes to electronic communication, specified as digital post.

80% of countries offers a delivery confirmation of electronic communication. Switzerland does not, and as such is part of the 20% rotten apples.

For online notifying or complaining about personal data being erroneous, 84% is the average among all countries, and in 79% can be self modified online. Here again, Switzerland does the opposite. It only allows for requesting the data, with the judicial system being the only recourse when the request for access or correction of information is declined (see various posts).

Now, I've left the score of Switzerland justice system out. Because I find it deserves extra special attention in view of its 2018 self assessment lies to its CoE partners.

The 2018 report puts Switzerland as the incontestable leader in digitalisation of the justice system.

The 2023 report puts Switzerland 6th worst out of 35, with only 44% corresponding to the EU norm.

Crystel Graf to the rescue

The Neuchatel minister Crystel Graf (CG) is responsible for child protection, data protection and Digital Administration. She pops up ad nauseam on the blog, as she is the politician responsible for the wrongdoing by omission to act when duly informed.

She is one of the persons who, among others, is violating electronic communication law, every week. As responsible minister, one must believe to not be subject to the law.

Meet the press release on twitter/X announcing CF gets a seat at the BDO. Notice the date of the EU report: 27 September. Notice the date of the press release: 27 September.

my conclusion

I'll let everyone make their own conclusions. To me, it would appear there is the need for people in power doing wrong to sit at arms length in order to cover up more easily, and the press has a need to speak of the country's modernity and superiority, while the reality is grim.

When:

• the 2nd power, the executive, covers up; and
• the 4th power, the press, fails; and
• the third power, justice, plays along …

How do you want such a country to not be corrupt?

Tags: #Rights #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

Today the Federal Prosecutor graced a template response answering yesterday's email. It had already responded back on May 10th 2023.

Basically no one can do any serious harm without the Swiss Federal Prosecutor being competent, but when Swiss authorities or civil servants violate the law as per the Federal Prosecutor's competence, he claims he is not competent. A renewed confirmation the Swiss authorities can do as the pretty please.

Some examples:

Copy of my response, followed by the correspondence received by the federal prosecutor.

response to the Swiss federal prosecutor

Re: AW: 27.09.2023 Continuation of Swiss authorities organised criminality and violations of human rights

Dear Makbule Dügünyurdu,

Thank your for your reply.

Referring to all previous correspondences I once again take note that the Federal Prosecuror's office finds Human Rights violations by Swiss federal authorities, intra-cantonal authorities, civil servants and citizens not of its competence. A non exhaustive list being:

international organised child kidnapping by Swiss authorities, including involvement of the federal central authority and federal judges subject to conflicts of interests, with pay-for-contracts in at least 4 jurisdictions (ES, FR, BE, UK): Trafficking in persons, particularly children. Modern forms of slavery. And others. transcantonal child sexual and psychological abuse, including transcantonal violation of children's protection rights transnational repression, retaliation against and persecution by Swiss authorities, including federal authorities, of whistleblower(s), victims and witnesses of the by Switzerland committed crimes Swiss lawyers and NGO's ganging together, co-intimidating authorities in different cantons and abroad prosecutors being bullied by civil servants and acting to their wishes cantonal, transcantonal, and international corruption violation by Swiss authorities of the universal right to language, electronic communication rights, rights of non-citizens and more.

I thus note the federal prosecurot's office opinion is that the above, among others are not: strongly affecting Swiss interests complex intercantonal or international organised crime offences corruption white collar crime that have an intercantonal or an international dimension offences against the interests of the international community, i.e. fundamental human rights violations

By Swiss authorities kidnapped children in situations of abuse and heinous crimes are due to be identified based on recordings. Any delay and consequences to those children is the result of the denials and violations of Human Rights by Swiss authorities, including your office.

I once again take note that access to justice is denied by the federal prosecutor's office: the packaging of the denunciations does not correspond to your authority's wishes no legal counsel is offered as dictated by international law and repeatedly pointed out This in itself is a violation of Human Rights.

Any eventual inappropriate wording and/or presenting, but not limited to, is henceforth the federal prosecutor's office sole responsibility.

As a whistleblower, victim and witness, under international law I am due protection, assistance and support by your office, including my children, as are other victims and witnesses.

Your office henceforth violates the Swiss constitution, which expressly underlines international instruments dictate over federal and/or local laws and praxis.

Publishing about the Human Rights violations by Swiss authorities, including your office, will continue under the universal right to truth principle, as will the notifications to your office of their ongoing nature.

For the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and have/are being published, in the interest of justice and the public at large.

Without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested.

email by the Federal Prosecutor, claiming incompetence for matters he is competent of

AW: 27.09.2023 Continuation of Swiss authorities organised criminality and violations of human rights

Dear Mr CENSORED,

We refer to your E-mail of 27 September 2023.

As we informed you in our letter dated 10 May 2023, the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland is the Swiss Confederation’s prosecution authority and as such has exclusive jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute specific offences under the Swiss Criminal Code (SCC) that are set out in Articles 23 and 24 of the Swiss Criminal Procedure Code (CrimPC). The prosecution of other offences falls under cantonal jurisdiction.

These offences comprise classic state security crimes, i.e. criminal acts primarily directed against the Swiss Confederation or which strongly affect its interests. They also include complex intercantonal or international organised crime offences (including terrorism and its financing), money laundering and corruption. In certain circumstances, the OAG also has jurisdiction over cases of white collar crime that have an intercantonal or an international dimension. In addition, the OAG is responsible for executing requests for mutual assistance from foreign prosecution authorities. Lastly the OAG is responsible for prosecuting offences against the interests of the international community, i.e. in times of peace, it conducts proceedings relating to genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.

The Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland does not act as a supervisory authority for cantonal or federal administrative, prosecution or judicial authorities. It has no statutory powers whatsoever to review or influence the conduct of any cantonal or federal authorities. As a consequence, it is not possible to submit complaints or requests for investigations relating to these authorities to the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland.

Your most recent letter contains no indication of any criminal offences whose prosecution falls within the jurisdiction of the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland.

We expressly draw your attention to the fact that we will neither reply to nor retain any further submissions relating to the same or similar matters for which we are not responsible after reviewing them, but will dispose of them without first contacting you.

Thank you for your understanding.

Yours sincerely.

Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland OAG

Makbule Dügünyurdu

Tags: #Rights #Whistleblower #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

While she is duly informed at least through her secretary and by having acknowledged and responded to messages in the past, she is personally responsible, perpetrator, of international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse through commission by omission to act.

She also violates the state's unambiguous obligation to protect witnesses, victims and whistleblowers.

As for Mr. Schallenberger, he only received my message from last Wednesday 14:00 this Monday morning September 25th 2023 at 9:15 AM, and today's 14:00 message has not yet been delivered.

Below first this week's email followed by last week's email.

This week's email notifying court order violations.

27.09.2023 Continuation of Swiss authorities organised criminality and violations of human rights TO: direct perpetrators by hierarchical (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Crystel Graf, Christian Fellrath, Yanick Bussy COPY: accessory perpetrators by (hierarchical) (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Arabelle Scyboz, Martine Docourt Ducommun, Alain Ribaux, Stefan Blättler

All herewith held personally responsible for the ongoing and organised corruption and criminality in international child kidnapping, child sexual integrity violations, child psychological integrity violations, child alienation, victim protection violations, witness protection violations, whistleblower protection violations, arbitrary persecution, transnational repression, discrimination on the basis of language-origin-nationality-gender-membership of social group, denial of justice, violation of access to justice, and other human rights violations as evidenced in the 500 hours recordings and documents, gathered and published for the benefit of justice and the public at large under the universal right to truth principle.

Reiterating all previous correspondences and the demands within.

Is added to the list of child and parental human rights violations by Swiss authorities today, 27.09.2023. Are in the meantime co-responsible by omission to act all those copied to the messages.

In total 27 consecutive weeks of Swiss court ordered contact rights violations due to Swiss authorities arbitrary persecution, transnational repression and racism as per defined in international instruments.

According to the OPE secretary, Mr. Schallenberger was not present at the OPE, and as such unavailable for the by court ordered appointment, and my children were once again contrary to said court order not presented in the OPE's care at 14:00. The secretary said there was no appointment for my children today, which is in violation of the court order. The message to Mr. Schallenberger last Wednesday was ultimately delivered as per date and time published online later today, no response has been obtained. This week's 14:00 message to him remains for now undelivered.

You might keep silent in the face of your violations of your international law obligations, it does not change the contents of the 500 hours recordings and documents evidencing the heinous crimes of pay-for-contract international child kidnapping, deliberate endangerment and known psychological and sexual integrity violations of children by your offices, committed by your administrations.

By not acting in the protection of witness, victim and whistleblower and not protecting children from further sexual and psychological abuse, you are all personally responsible for commission by omission of crimes.

I again notify:

I hold personally responsible and accountable as directors of their service Mrs. Graf, Mr Fellrath and Mr. Bussy, fully made aware of the ongoing child sexual and psychological integrity violations as well as the Bern, Geneva, Neuchatel, Jura cantonal and Swiss Federal state for these continuous acts of violence and corruption by the state and its authorities.

Under the universal right to truth, publication of the premeditated criminal acts by the Swiss authorities continues.

Should this correspondence better be addressed by a legal scholar, you are reminded articles 7 to 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and access to justice, are still violated by the Swiss authorities, including yourselves. In particular by the Neuchatel Magistrate's Council and its president violating access to justice under International Law.

Referring to the registered mail received by authorities dated August 14th 2023, June 8th 2023, and all electronic communication defined by International Law, such as email and public posting under the universal right to truth principle.

For the remainder reiterating all previous correspondences in their entirety.

Without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested.

Last week's email notifying court order violations.

20.09.2023 Continuation of Swiss authorities organised criminality and violations of human rights TO: direct perpetrators by hierarchical (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Crystel Graf, Christian Fellrath, Yanick Bussy COPY: accessory perpetrators by (hierarchical) (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Arabelle Scyboz, Martine Docourt Ducommun, Alain Ribaux, Stefan Blättler

All herewith held personally responsible for the ongoing and organised corruption and criminality in international child kidnapping, child sexual integrity violations, child psychological integrity violations, child alienation, victim protection violations, witness protection violations, whistleblower protection violations, arbitrary persecution, transnational repression, discrimination on the basis of language-origin-nationality-gender-membership of social group, denial of justice, violation of access to justice, and other human rights violations as evidenced in the 500 hours recordings and documents, gathered and published for the benefit of justice and the public at large under the universal right to truth principle.

Reiterating all previous correspondences and the demands within.

Is added to the list of child and parental human rights violations by Swiss authorities today, 20.09.2023. Are in the meantime co-responsible by omission to act all those copied to the messages.

In total 26 consecutive weeks of Swiss court ordered contact rights violations due to Swiss authorities arbitrary persecution, transnational repression and racism as per defined in international instruments.

According to the OPE secretary, Mr. Schallenberger was not present at the OPE, and as such unavailable for the by court ordered appointment, and my children were once again contrary to said court order not presented in the OPE's care at 14:00. The previous messages to Mr. Schallenberger ultimately delivered as per published, no response has been obtained. This week's 14:00 message remained undelivered.

You might keep silent in the face of your violations of your international law obligations, it does not change the contents of the 500 hours recordings and documents evidencing the heinous crimes of pay-for-contract international child kidnapping, deliberate endangerment and known psychological and sexual integrity violations of children by your offices, committed by your administrations.

I again notify:

I hold personally responsible and accountable as directors of their service Mrs. Graf, Mr Fellrath and Mr. Bussy, fully made aware of the ongoing child sexual and psychological integrity violations as well as the Bern, Geneva, Neuchatel, Jura cantonal and Swiss Federal state for these continuous acts of violence and corruption by the state and its authorities.

Under the universal right to truth, publication of the premeditated criminal acts by the Swiss authorities continues.

Should this correspondence better be addressed by a legal scholar, you are reminded articles 7 to 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and access to justice, are still violated by the Swiss authorities, including yourselves. In particular by the Neuchatel Magistrate's Council and its president violating access to justice under International Law.

Referring to the registered mail received by authorities dated August 14th 2023, June 8th 2023, and all electronic communication defined by International Law, such as email and public posting under the universal right to truth principle.

For the remainder reiterating all previous correspondences in their entirety.

Without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested.

Tags: #Rights #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

I am battling with IT, unable to publish a clickable graphic page. So herewith a static picture, and this linked PDF of the picture with clickable links. Underneath the descriptions.

Crystel Graf

Crystel Graf is minister of child protection services, discussed.

• Contacted and complained to repeatedly about the chain of command silencing the corruption and criminality.
• Never acknowledged receipt other then holiday auto-replies. Never acted.
• Perpetrator through commission by omission of international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse.
• Mentioned and referred to throughout the blog.

Christian Fellrath

Christian Fellrath is director of the child and adult protection services, discussed.

• Was allegedly going to investigate/respond claims brought forward, but never did.
• Tried to justify his services actions with a false court order.
• Perpetrator through commission by omission of international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse.
• Mentioned and referred to throughout the blog.

Yanick Bussy

Yanick Bussy is director of the child protection services, discussed.

• Announced an investigation into his department’s wrongdoing, which never substantiated. Both in writing and on recording.
• Perpetrator through commission by omission of international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse.
• Mentioned and referred to throughout the blog.

Sophie Neuhaus

Sophie Neuhaus the Youth Delegate director, discussed.

• Written evidence of personal contact with the child kidnapping, child sexual and psychological violence endangering mother.
• Allegedly shares (or used to share) office with Yanick Bussy
• Never personally contacted.

Sandra Joseph

Sandra Joseph is deputy director to Yanick Bussy. (No need for discussion, never met or had dealings with)

• Former lawyer, hired to help alleviate the child protection service from the accountability of excess wrongdoing legal cases.
• Never met, reputation and gossip alleging violation of children’s rights in favour of women’s claims.
• Lawyer profile link
• Public profile link

Frédéric Schallenberger

Frédéric Schallenberger is the former child protection services director and current social assistant. (To be published)

• False reports, corruption, intimidation of prosecutor, befriends perpetrators and lawyers, endangers children in child psychological and sexual abuse, disclosed intimate details of international child kidnapping and manipulation of foreign authorities in Europe and particularly France, Belgium.
• Active perpetrator violating court orders, kidnapping children, dismissing children spontaneous accounts of child sexual abuse and requests for help.

Manuela de Montmollin

Manuela de Montmollin is a social assistant. (To be published)

• False report, corruption, endangers children in child sexual abuse, disclosed scheme of international child kidnapping and manipulation of foreign authorities throughout Europe and France.

Jérôme Erard

Jérôme Erard is social assistant and substitute to Frédéric Schallenberger. (To be discussed)

• Noted down child sexual abuse and would revert back after reporting to hierarchy.
• Never heard back. Inquired at secretary, left messages, and never called back either.

Adrien Omer

Adrien Omer is a social assistant and sporadic substitute to Frédéric Schallenberger when unavailable. (No need to discuss)

• Mostly kept unaware of the cases, simply executed a task in a courteous manner.

Nicolas Jornod

Nicolas Jornod is the regional child protection office manager. (To be discussed)

• Denied any wrongdoing or corruption in false reports without any investigation.

secretaries

The child protection services secretaries are well informed of the various cases. (To be discussed)

• A few false claims, corruption and interdisciplinary collegiality.

#Rights #Whistleblower #accesstojustice #Kidnapping #Psychological #Sexual

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

KZ asked:

Sorry, where on the Children for Status website do you have the recordings? I can't find them anywhere. I asked the question because you kept mentioning you had the recordings available but I couldn't find them anywhere, so I was interested. I'm sorry you aren't being heard by the authorities.

The First source of Swiss Rights Violation recordings was posted in the beginning of June, now 3 months ago.

In the post I refer the detailed dates and times of the first source of recordings, those with my own children who are by Swiss authorities kidnapped, sexually and psychologically abused. These include several phone calls and meetings immediately prior to and/or after the kids. Accounting for in total some 427 hours.

I honestly have no idea yet how many hours the other, not yet indexed recordings span. I think I am half way through at 41 hours. That's why I have been talking about some 500 hours recordings in total.

Why recordings, and why not release them?

I started recording because of the grotesque unbelievability of what I was witnessing on one hand, and the threats by Swiss judges I was subjected to on the other hand.

There is a huge amount of material, ranging from the criminal behaviour of the Swiss schools and teachers, the child protection services, the judges, the lawyers, the doctors, the pedopsychiatrists, the police, ... You name it, I recorded it.

There is no other way to document the criminal ganging of people to hide their wrongdoing.

The recordings attest to a well oiled criminal enterprise of and by authorities and civil servants. Forget Dallas, this goes well beyond anything most sane people can ever be moved into imagining.

On several recordings you can hear how civil servants discuss their strategy to kidnap children abroad. Such as children's first names, countries, airport to use, who'll buy plane tickets, which judges are inclined and which judges less so, the central authority, involved NGO's, contracts, ... The whole strategy to kidnap children abroad and bring them under Swiss control is mapped out throughout these recordings.

And yet, despite this unalienable evidence, no one is interested.

It would be easy, wouldn't it? Just dump the several GB of data online, for people to make up their own mind. I wonder, will any private person take the time to go through the 500 hours? At a rate of 8 hours a day, non-stop every day, there is 63 days worth of material. That's without the documents...

I can understand for most people it is easier to consider it too big to fathom the possibility.

Who has the recordings?

The Swiss civil judge Yannick Jubin refused in audience to receive my USB stick, whilst the jurisprudence in Switzerland dictates he must receive it.

The Swiss public prosecutor Raphael Arn refused the recordings when I stood in front of him. He bounced back and refused to touch the recording device, yelling at me as if someone was holding him at gun point, with a recording device...

A Swiss bailiff certified the transcription of one recording as counter evidence to the 3 lawyers ganging together against me with one of their many lies. And whilst this is one recording having become an official and incontestable paper trial – evidence of lawyers Marie Berger, Jean-Marie Röthlisberger and Mathias Eusebio ganging together with the perpetrators in lies against a witness, victim and whistleblower – the public prosecutor has as far as I know never done anything to protect the children victims or myself.

The Belgian public prosecutor has received about half the recordings. He tries to refuse the case arguing that it would take too long to go through all the recordings, and denies to request the remainder of the recordings. It is hard to pinpoint a single responsible party here, as it is a different substitute signing, every time.

I have documents showing how the Swiss interfere in the Belgian justice system. Black-on white. I also have recordings of some of it. I guess that's where the Belgian public prosecutor prefers the case to be silenced, their head lies in the balance too.

That is the state of the justice system when authorities are involved in international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse. An all hands on deck need to silence the case, by whatever means, whatever the cost.

So what other reasons for not throwing just everything in bulk online, other then no single person would take the time to go through the recordings in detail like I have done (and keep doing)?

Children are named by first names. Parents are referred by “the mother”, “the father”, not their actual names. Other then the perpetrators who'd immediately be informed about which criminal acts against which children are on recording, only a public prosecutor, talented investigative journalist or private investigator could try to track down these other, to be identified children.

That's where investigative journalists come in?

Most journalists, given the sheer amount of recordings, reply “it's complicated”. Then some journalists have asked “give us the one damning explicit recording”. And when I pointed a recording, as journalists must do, the ask the judge/public prosecutor for comment, only to return:

We can't do anything. It is complicated. Different languages, several wrongdoers, several countries, such a network, …

Ultimately you get the honest answers:

• afraid of journalist career retaliation
• intimidated by the public prosecutor into fear of ending up on the accused bench themselves

Faced with a well oiled criminal enterprise which will not back down and do every criminal act (I've had a few attempts on my life), journalists are moved to think twice. One journalist was fair and square: scared for their kids.

Considering private investigators, the costs and fees associated are excruciatingly expensive. I don't have a dime other then my fingers typing the keyboard of my computer.

And I am denied access to justice in both countries whilst I have the recordings and the documents.

So what's left?

That's where I have been writing, and will keep on writing, in the context of the universal right to truth. This has long evolved from “simple” sexual abuse from a grandparent against my daughter which I have been witness of back in 2018, to large scale corruption going all the way to the highest top of Swiss society, and its criminal transnational influence.

What's astonishing, not a single criminal complaint has been filed since I divulge online. The consequence of any criminal investigation against me for the recordings or what I publish would demand for the recordings to be examined. Exactly what they do not want, because it is them, not me, who would end up in jail.

It is easier for authorities to deny access to justice, and persecute the whistleblower arbitrarily on any cheap thumb sucking fabrication under the cover of the highest judiciary not acting. Such as Arabelle Scyboz, the president of the highest cantonal judiciary, or the Swiss Federal Prosecutor, violating human rights and international instruments, making sure there is no defence made available and no investigation.

In the meantime, business as usual. Children remain psychologically and sexually abused, kidnappings can continue, and children are coerced into to authorities comforting testimonies for which the recordings as counter evidence are denied.

Filthy, disgusting, criminal, corrupt, ... there is no vocabulary suitable to describe the Swiss.

Tags: #rights #Whistleblower #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

Whether it is in Belgium or now also in Switzerland, the cases reported in the press are cadencing:

• report on how Belgian journalists suffer repression when publishing on the subject with evidence, such as foreign DNA material in a child's underpants and recordings;
• report on how a Swiss journalist got thrown into jail for investigating child sexual abuse
• a Belgian VIP getting arrested for the possession of Child Sexual Abuse material
• a documentary series on how child sexual abuse in the church in Belgium still suffers from the same mistakes made by justice
• a preliminary report on child sexual abuse in the church in Switzerland

Let's hope the momentum stays, more on that I hope in this weekend's fesip.

With all of these events deserving full attention, spreading knowledge about the widespread phenomenon of omerta in child sexual abuse, my own whistleblowing work is running all over the place, and behind.

Wednesday my children were yet again, for the 25th consecutive week, not presented at the child protection's office. The child protection's office which allegedly has no news about my children. The responsible person being in other meetings whilst he is supposed to execute a court order, …

The secretary was apologetic. She tried to argue she is only the secretary, that she does not know. I replied she does know, every week I call, everyone in their office knows. Then saying I needed to write. I replied both a message and an email are sent every week, but that there never is any reply to the email, nor that the message gets delivery notifications since August 23rd.

Following the phone call, I sent the usual email, and at 4:19 PM suddenly all messages since August 23rd get delivered to the by court ordered person who needs to ensure my children are in his care every Wednesday at 14:00.

In the below screenshot I censored his account identifier so he wouldn't get spammed by people who are just as outraged as I am about the ongoing court order violations, sexual and psychological abuse of children, pay-for-contract international child kidnapping he is part of, which his superiors in command all the way to the minister, as well as the justice system, are fully informed of but do nothing about.

Copy of the email sent Wed, 13 Sept • 2:38 pm

TO: direct perpetrators by hierarchical (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Crystel Graf, Christian Fellrath, Yanick Bussy COPY: accessory perpetrators by (hierarchical) (co-)responsibility and commission by omission: Arabelle Scyboz, Martine Docourt Ducommun, Alain Ribaux, Stefan Blättler

All herewith held personally responsible for the ongoing and organised corruption and criminality in international child kidnapping, child sexual integrity violations, child psychological integrity violations, child alienation, victim protection violations, witness protection violations, whistleblower protection violations, arbitrary persecution, transnational repression, discrimination on the basis of language-origin-nationality-gender-membership of social group, denial of justice, violation of access to justice, and other human rights violations as evidenced in the 500 hours recordings and documents, gathered and published for the benefit of justice and the public at large under the universal right to truth principle.

Reiterating all previous correspondences and the demands within.

Is added to the list of child and parental human rights violations by Swiss authorities today, 13.09.2023. Are in the meantime co-responsible by omission to act all those copied to the messages.

In total 25 consecutive weeks of Swiss court ordered contact rights violations due to Swiss authorities arbitrary persecution, transnational repression and racism as per defined in international instruments.

According to the OPE secretary, Mr. Schallenberger was present at the OPE, but unavailable for the by court ordered appointment, and my children were once again contrary to said court order not presented in the OPE's care at 14:00. Reiterating the messages to Mr. Schallenberger are not delivered since at least August 23rd 2023, in violation of international law on electronic communication.

I again notify:

I hold personally responsible and accountable as directors of their service Mrs. Graf, Mr Fellrath and Mr. Bussy, fully made aware of the ongoing child sexual and psychological integrity violations as well as the Bern, Geneva, Neuchatel, Jura cantonal and Swiss Federal state for these continuous acts of violence and corruption by the state and its authorities.

Under the universal right to truth, publication of the premeditated criminal acts by the Swiss authorities continues.

Should this correspondence better be addressed by a legal scholar, you are reminded articles 7 to 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and access to justice, are still violated by the Swiss authorities, including yourselves. In particular by the Neuchatel Magistrate's Council and its president violating access to justice under International Law.

Referring to the registered mail received by authorities dated August 14th 2023, June 8th 2023, and all electronic communication defined by International Law, such as email and public posting under the universal right to truth principle.

For the remainder reiterating all previous correspondences in their entirety.

Without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested.

Tags: #Rights #Whistleblower

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023