While they had by phone conceded they would get back to me as soon as possible, it is only today, 130 days later, that a reply arrived. And the reply does not actually address the problem.

On June 15th I asked:

In the name of transparency for publicly recognised Non Governmental Organisations I would like to know the links and/or partnerships between Missing Children Europe and the International Social Service, as well as the links between the national Missing Children partners and national members of the International Social Service. Can you please clarify any links, and contractual agreements, between organisations? Thank you.

Their answer today goes on questioning how 4 months ago the Google services integration on their web site blocked anyone whose firewall blocks Google services from accessing the MCE web site.

They do not respond, clarify, provide transparency as to the nature of their intra-organisation contracts or collegial ties, nor how these may affect and contribute to International Child Kidnapping and Child Sexual Abuse not being investigated.

As those who follow the blog know, I have recordings, documents and contracts of their Swiss partners active involvement in both kidnapping and sexual abuse of children. This includes how transnational and interdisciplinary collegiality (mafia) gets in the way at their Belgian chapter. How their organisation(s) do not perform their legal duties under international law and their child protection policy as a consequence. And how they are funded by perpetrators to be instrumental in the kidnapping and abuse of children.

But importantly, I can not help but notice on Sunday I wrote the the Belgian Parliamentary Investigation Commission on Child Sexual Abuse, highlighting the organisation, and 2 days later out of the blue an email arrives.

If you look at the timeline:

• June 15th email to MCE
• June 17th published MCE research
• October 22nd email to commission
• October 25th MCE responds, without addressing the issue

Of course this is pure coincidence?

I responded to today's by MCE received correspondence as follows:

June 15th 2023 notification of transparency access request on: >> the links and/or partnerships between Missing Children Europe and the International Social Service, as well as the links between the national Missing Children partners and national members of the International Social Service. Can you please clarify any links, and contractual agreements, between organisations? << No reply to date. 130 days. Missing Children Europe still has the duty to transparency. The questions remain unanswered, and not addressed in your below response.

They might get addressed by the Parliamentary Investigation Commission, or they might respond. In any case, the dice are out there, just waiting to see how they're going to be dealt with, and by who.

*Tags: #Rights #Kidnapping #Sexual #Accesstojustice *

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

Time for a little round-up on the ongoing Wednesday's Swiss court order violations by Swiss authorities, as introduction to the wider picture, and the upcoming Swiss elections.

On October 4th Crystel Graf's (the minister responsible for child protection and electronic communication) autoreply confirmed once again good reception of the correspondence denouncing the court order and human rights violations committed by her department. She has, as usual, still not taken responsibility. This has been ongoing for at least 30 weeks.

On October 11th, the ongoing court order violation. Children were not presented to the child protection services. Mr. Schallenberger who is responsible for making sure children are presented at 14:00 in the child protection care not even being at the office.

On October 18th Mr. Schallenberger was according to the secretary of the child protection services on holiday. No information had been provided beforehand. Accounting for week 30 of Swiss court order violations by the Swiss child protection services.

Arabelle Scyboz, still listed as the president of the Magistrate's Council which is the judiciary supervising authority, is still violating international and Swiss law on electronic communication and allowing the corruption by the judiciary she is responsible of. She is still banning electronic communication denouncing the heinous human rights crimes committed under her ultimate responsibility, and still denying access to justice.

All of this is possible under the watchful eye of the parliamentary judiciary commission. Their secretary is in copy of the various denunciations. Its president, Céline Dupraz, responded once, on May 8th, confirming:

sa mission de haute surveillance

Its mission of high surveillance of the judiciary, and …

respecter la séparation des pouvoirs

It prefers to respect the separation of powers then investigate the ongoing heinous human rights violations committed by the judiciary it is supposed to be the high surveillance authority of.

Basically the Parliamentary Commission who is supposed to scrutinise the methods and proper working of the judiciary in the interest of the public, says the judiciary can continue to be corrupted and commit human rights crimes.

The president of the parliament, currently Martine Docourt Ducommun, identically fully informed, has never responded or acted.

Nor has the minister of justice and currently acting prime minister, Alain Ribaud, ever responded or acted.

That in Switzerland the fish rots from the head is well documented throughout the +130 posts on the blog. Above is only a succinct overview.

The public who is voting these politicians into power has a universal right to truth about their state officials involvement in some of the worst human rights crimes, and actively helping for those crimes to be covered up. It is more then just monkeys “don't hear, don't see, don't speak” commission by omission to act.

Would you vote for a politician when you know of unalienable evidence of ongoing human right crimes, particularly against children, co-perpetrated and covered-up by those in power?

the veil of democracy and the rule of law used to validate corrupt votes

Under a veil of imposed silence it is the Swiss authorities who ensure the denial of the universal right to truth. The public and the press are terrorised and do not dare to speak up for fear of their authorities retaliating. Reminiscent of the German “wir haben es nicht gewusst” syndrome under the rule of the second world war Gestapo.

Being witness and having evidence to that, I open an additional chapter in my whistleblowing on Swiss authorities corruption. Why would I keep being scared to fully speak up, remain quiet, in the face of the Swiss wishing me dead and do everything to it anyway. Including attempts on my life.

It so happens that due to my privileged position I can document how the fraud in recent votes in Switzerland was organised. With the evidence I have, I can not attest the end result would have been different, but I can attest to systematic electoral fraud.

I can also attest to the prosecutor, Raphael Arn, having to investigate the electoral fraud while being under influence and manipulated. He has to function in his little village of Moutier, which claims the through electoral fraud obtained status of metropolitan city of the Jura. At some 7000 inhabitants, it surely is a joke. Those who follow the blog will recognise Raphael Arn's name from the child sexual abuse cases, and the documented transcantonal influence and threats by authorities he is under, to let child sexual abusers continue their perpetration against children.

I have it on recording, no wonder he did not want the recordings when I presented him the recordings. No wonder he has never acted on the by him received registered mail indicating his office's violations of various human rights.

You see in Switzerland, in light of any kind of wrongdoing, an independent outsider is not used to investigate. A local, subject to local pressures of interest, is used.

Corruption is second nature to the Swiss. Any government official in power has to take an active role in it. The Swiss even have a fancy name for their deliberately organised wrongdoing. They call it “interdisciplinary collegiality”.

Switzerland acclaims its status of superior democracy by ensuring its controllers are locked in this “interdisciplinary collegiality”. Being it the controllers of the parliament, of the judiciary, of the police, of the medical profession, ... all are subject to the same fancy worded mafia get along and shut up praxis.

Bring on the SLAPP's

Due to my eye problems, I've had the luxury of talking on the phone to a few Swiss whistleblowers over the last weeks. People who had the courage to denounce Swiss wrongdoing.

Not one of them knows any whistleblower who has not been persecuted by Swiss authorities. They all suffer SLAPP's – Strategic lawsuits against public participation - and human rights violations in Swiss authorities mostly successful attempts to silence whistleblowers, and allow for corruption to prevail.

The Swiss public believes firmly in their superiority. How can they otherwise when the press, the fourth power, can not speak up under threat of legal action and undue influence of prosecutors into what may and may not get published. The various Swiss journalists I talked to, evidence at hand, are all afraid of one thing: being SLAPP-ed.

As an example, in Switzerland, a criminal complaint alleging calumny takes precedence over any other criminal activity being performed. First the calumny is examined, only if the judiciary decides there is no calumny after years of proceedings, then the criminal activity may be possibly looked into. By then the combination of statute of limitations and destruction of evidence all account for a return to … calumny. Because if they can not condemn the wrongdoing due to the destruction of evidence and/or statute of limitations, well it must be calumny after all.

And for calumny proving, all tools are used. False witness statements, wrong translations, falsified documents, abuse of power, bribery, …

Another Swiss national sport is violating its international obligations under the United Nations Convention Against Corruption and the OECD Anti Bribery Conventions.

Swiss are so infiltrated in those organisations that whenever the international controlling organisms show a pointing finger at Switzerland, as per the OECD example, a simple alleged verbal report suffices to silence the reporting on Switzerland's wrongdoing.

Let me put that in layman's terms: Go to dinner, have a meal, and a pinch of intimidation and threats, and all is wrapped in silence.

In Switzerland, democracy and the rule of law are mirages. The ego of the perpetrators is more important then what they themselves call the “superior interest of the state in the manifestation of the truth”, or combatting corruption.

To the Swiss, the only truth that matters, is making sure no one dares to speak up against corruption, or be warned of the far reaching retaliation, transnational repression, persecution, including attempts on life.

The amount of illegally, without trial, detained people in Swiss prisons on the basis of daring to speak up against corruption is astonishing. Those who spoke up against wrongdoing and before being locked up arbitrarily decide to flee the country face life-long transnational repression and persecution.

Any access to foreign authority positions is abused by the Swiss, for example like I documented in the illegal SIS-II database usage. Which appears to be a systematic abuse in Swiss whistleblower cases.

The renaissance of the methods of the likes of the Nazi, the Khmer Rouge, the Junta, … is happening in Switzerland. The only difference is these human rights violating regimes came to power on the basis of a series of political and economic crises, whilst in Switzerland it happens with the hidden stolen wealth accumulated by these criminal regimes as collateral.

so who are the Swiss voting for coming Sunday?

In absence of the press, the fourth power, legal ability to report Swiss authorities wrongdoing to the public, and in presence of interdisciplinary collegiality disease throughout the controlling of Swiss authorities, I'll let you decide on how you think the Swiss elections will turn out.

I forecast it will be a team of same-old-same-old with a sprinkle of newly controlled interdisciplinary collegial individuals. Some shuffling of positions, and on the country goes for another 4 years of political and judicial corruption galore.

I already extend the invitation to all the world's pedophiles and child kidnappers: flock to Switzerland. The federal minister participates in the denial of child sexual abuse disease in the country, and Swiss kidnapping authorities have their international child kidnapping dictator uninvestigated for over 3 years now. Really, if you are an international child kidnapper or a child sexual abuser, the Swiss will treat you with welcoming reverence, and make sure your wrongdoing never gets actioned against, for if it should even only be mentioned, you have the superior calumny and other human rights violating weapons of mass silencing at your fullest disposal. Including the omerta'd parliament.

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Kidnapping #Accesstojustice #Whistleblower

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

I am battling with IT, unable to publish a clickable graphic page. So herewith a static picture, and this linked PDF of the picture with clickable links. Underneath the descriptions.

Crystel Graf

Crystel Graf is minister of child protection services, discussed.

• Contacted and complained to repeatedly about the chain of command silencing the corruption and criminality.
• Never acknowledged receipt other then holiday auto-replies. Never acted.
• Perpetrator through commission by omission of international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse.
• Mentioned and referred to throughout the blog.

Christian Fellrath

Christian Fellrath is director of the child and adult protection services, discussed.

• Was allegedly going to investigate/respond claims brought forward, but never did.
• Tried to justify his services actions with a false court order.
• Perpetrator through commission by omission of international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse.
• Mentioned and referred to throughout the blog.

Yanick Bussy

Yanick Bussy is director of the child protection services, discussed.

• Announced an investigation into his department’s wrongdoing, which never substantiated. Both in writing and on recording.
• Perpetrator through commission by omission of international child kidnapping and child sexual abuse.
• Mentioned and referred to throughout the blog.

Sophie Neuhaus

Sophie Neuhaus the Youth Delegate director, discussed.

• Written evidence of personal contact with the child kidnapping, child sexual and psychological violence endangering mother.
• Allegedly shares (or used to share) office with Yanick Bussy
• Never personally contacted.

Sandra Joseph

Sandra Joseph is deputy director to Yanick Bussy. (No need for discussion, never met or had dealings with)

• Former lawyer, hired to help alleviate the child protection service from the accountability of excess wrongdoing legal cases.
• Never met, reputation and gossip alleging violation of children’s rights in favour of women’s claims.
• Lawyer profile link
• Public profile link

Frédéric Schallenberger

Frédéric Schallenberger is the former child protection services director and current social assistant. (To be published)

• False reports, corruption, intimidation of prosecutor, befriends perpetrators and lawyers, endangers children in child psychological and sexual abuse, disclosed intimate details of international child kidnapping and manipulation of foreign authorities in Europe and particularly France, Belgium.
• Active perpetrator violating court orders, kidnapping children, dismissing children spontaneous accounts of child sexual abuse and requests for help.

Manuela de Montmollin

Manuela de Montmollin is a social assistant. (To be published)

• False report, corruption, endangers children in child sexual abuse, disclosed scheme of international child kidnapping and manipulation of foreign authorities throughout Europe and France.

Jérôme Erard

Jérôme Erard is social assistant and substitute to Frédéric Schallenberger. (To be discussed)

• Noted down child sexual abuse and would revert back after reporting to hierarchy.
• Never heard back. Inquired at secretary, left messages, and never called back either.

Adrien Omer

Adrien Omer is a social assistant and sporadic substitute to Frédéric Schallenberger when unavailable. (No need to discuss)

• Mostly kept unaware of the cases, simply executed a task in a courteous manner.

Nicolas Jornod

Nicolas Jornod is the regional child protection office manager. (To be discussed)

• Denied any wrongdoing or corruption in false reports without any investigation.

secretaries

The child protection services secretaries are well informed of the various cases. (To be discussed)

• A few false claims, corruption and interdisciplinary collegiality.

#Rights #Whistleblower #accesstojustice #Kidnapping #Psychological #Sexual

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

Yes, I know!

I am whistleblowing about Swiss authorities committing the deliberate and organised crimes of Child Sexual Abuse and pay-for-contract International Child Kidnapping. I have some 500 hours recordings, documents, copies of contracts. I have on recording authorities planning the kidnapping of children abroad and finding it is better to leave children from time to time with their child sexual abuser then to protect them. I lived authorities dismissing evidence and make up false evidence in order to do everything they can to keep hidden their heinous denial of child sexual abuse. I am whistleblowing about Switzerland automatically retaliating, transnationally repressing and persecuting whistleblowers. …

Yes, I know!

But what happened today just makes a fully knowledgeable, seasoned and ardent fighter for Child Sexual Abuse victims in Switzerland sick. Switzerland is a country sick beyond help. Switzerland which we all take for granted as being the highest order in Human Rights protections and the rule of law, is the most despicable, victim blaming, disrespectful country in the world. By a long shot.

The report

The report titled “Rapport concernant le projet pilote sur l'histoire des abus sexuels dans le contexte de l'Église catholique romaine en Suisse depuis le milieu du 20ème siècle“ is a work by historians.

You read that right. In Switzerland Child Sexual Abuse is examined by historians. It is not deemed a contemporary problem, but a problem of bygone era's, to be documented by historians.

In addition, it is a pilot project. Indeed, there is such disbelief Switzerland could be a nation like all other nations around the world. Remember, elsewhere 1 in 4 persons has suffered child sexual abuse in their childhood. So the Swiss figured, let's do a test and see how it goes.

Kudos to the historians who dared to take the olympic, Herculean difficult task to lead a pilot project on a subject whose existence in Switzerland is totally denied. Monika Dommann and Marietta Meier, and their team, deserve more then the gold medal.

The pilot project by the historians of Zurich University started in January 2020, and was presented today, September 12th 2023.

Three and a half years to document 1002 cases for which as historians, they were given access to certain archives of bishops.

Their conclusions are manyfold, but a few stand out. Note I have these from press clippings. I have yet to read and verify the below press outburst in the 134 pages report. It not being in English, will take me some time to verify the press said the right things:

• more boys then girls have been subject to child sexual abuse in the church
• records have been removed and destroyed
• 1002 records were examined since the 1950's
• only the tip of the iceberg according to the reporters
• given the culture of silence and non reporting, most victims never dared to speak up

Most of these conclusions had already been alerted by the CECAR, who's been silenced and budget strapped so not much could come out of it. I published about this in the post on Which Swiss NGO's should act in matters of sexual violence on children?.

The shock

Some math to help the Swiss who love numbers when it comes to wealth and profit, but despise numbers when it comes to victims.

In France, the CIASE investigated 330.000 cases for 64 million people. It was admitted there that too many victims choose not to speak, and estimated at least 500.000 victims should be remembered.

9 million people live in Switzerland. Statistically, it means in Switzerland some 45.000 victims are to be expected. Of that, the pilot project looked at 1002 cases. Let's be harsh, and round it off at 2%.

Are the Swiss prepared to take the leap into shedding light on their heinousness as other countries have done? They're in for a shocker starting at 2% …

The church speaks

While the church admits it destroyed records, it pleads guilty for the crime of widespread child sexual abuse. I admit I am surprised about the rush-of-the moment flat out mea-culpa by the Swiss church, I applaud it. It is a first not seen in any other country where the church has always tried to embellish the problem.

Maybe the dissident voices of the church have not yet spoken? Let's wait and see in the coming days.

The Basel Diocese, Bishop Felix Gmür

I reached out to the researchers as I have evidence of wrongdoing in this diocese. Allow me to publish later, once I see whether they reach out or not.

In any case, the Bishop could not be clearer in the press fully acknowledging the church's responsibility.

The minister Elisabeth Baume-Schneider speaks

And this is where I get angry. Really angry. A fine example of how in Switzerland the fish rots from the head down.

The Federal Councillor for justice, the justice minister, Elisabeth Baume-Schneider, is from the Jura.

Here is what she said:

An “alarming” but “significant” study which could bring us to action. this study is alarming, but it is also a significant step towards getting us to act.

I guess the Swiss commander in chief and its public need to think it through whether when faced with child sexual abuse it is appropriate to act or not? From experience I know they do everything to not act, until this day, regardless of 500 hours unalienable evidence.

she criticised a system “that at some point probably chose to protect the institution and the perpetrators more than the victims.

Let me tell you and confirm, I have the evidence the Swiss system systematically choses to protect the institutions and perpetrator to the detriment of victims. What disgusts most is that the report points out this culture, but the minister dares to doubt it with “probably”.

we're out of the emotional side and we have factual elements.

It characterises the total incompetence and incapability of the minister to have any empathy when faced with the most heinous crime that is child sexual abuse. Ask any child sexual abuse victim about emotion versus factual elements. Disgraceful at best.

There is now a real breeding ground on which we can work

As if civil society has not been crying out. Remember for example Incest according to Manon Schick, Mrs. Justice Minister? Wir haben es nicht gewusst!

The courts will now be able to respond to complaints or proceedings that take place as a result of this situation.

This is revolting. Switzerland's courts have been in a constitutional obligation to act for decennia. Last time I published about the monist system is no later then this morning. But the minister is right. I too call for Nuremberg to come down on Switzerland. A public parliamentary investigation into the Swiss authorities organised crime of pay-for international child kidnapping contracts and sexual abuse. But ...

we can only apologise

The minister confirms Switzerland is adamant at violating universal human rights.

• right to protection
• right to support
• right to non recurrence
• right to reparation

Err, no, you get a “we can only apologise” Sorry Mrs. Minister, your advocating against human rights leads to the conclusion you should resign.

but above all we must commit ourselves to ensuring that this is no longer possible

Probably the only “honest” part. Admitting the crime of Child Sexual Abuse is possible in Switzerland today, and that the Swiss “must commit themselves” against it.

those who have not dared to testify to find an environment where they can express themselves so that they can feel better.

WHERE? There is no where in Switzerland where victims can testify without being treated first and foremost as calumny perpetrators. There is no where in Switzerland where people may get help to feel better.

The country is devoid of professionals as per several international reports. Including the Swiss mental health industry itself, like ESPAS, admits there is a lack of adequate professionals.

So minister, unless you go deep, very deep, in your endless holocaust confiscated money pockets, and announce a full remediation programme so the competence in child sexual abuse can not only exist but be broadly, easily and financially accessibly available, you are saying to victims:

“screw you, you're on your own, deal with it yourselves, we, the state, are not going to help you, go away so we don't see you as we don't intent to help you anyway”

That, Mrs Minister, is your message to Child Sexual Abuse Victims today.

Mrs. Minister, you should be ashamed of yourself, and resign. No empathy, no recognition, no assistance for victims who you ostracise and leave to their own damaged person to deal with hurt inflicted upon them as children, silenced by authority, and alone.

Conclusion

The Swiss need to have their head looked into. Seriously.

This is no way for the highest official of a country to deal with a societally silenced and denied pandemic which is so big it is impossible to keep it unacknowledged. Yet the Swiss being interdisciplinary collegial at silence, no wonder omerta among authorities perdures. To then keep going the stigmatisation and dismissal of victims of child sexual abuse is criminal. And there is International law which constitutionally must be executed.

Violations of the Lanzarote convention. Violations of the Convention one the Rights of the Child and its optional protocol. Violations of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Violations of the European Declaration of Human Rights.

No, seriously, this lady's disrespect for victims of the most heinous crime, and the law, is totally unfit for office, and needs to step down.

The country is reputed for its cows and cheese. Today it is yet again showing its real face: a country of sheep mended by wolves who will not hesitate to kill any victim voice, and feast on its cadaver as example for all sheep to never dare to speak up against deliberate state organised wrongdoing in Child Sexual Abuse.

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Whistleblower #Kidnapping #Psychological

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

Wednesday the Magistrate's Council replied to the week 20 denunciation of rights violations by authorities.

What is the Magistrate's council?

You can find the details directly on their web site.

The Conseil de la magistrature is the supervisory authority for judicial authorities and magistrates. It ensures that the judicial system functions properly. It is responsible for the administrative supervision of the judicial authorities and the disciplinary supervision of members of the judiciary.

It is the Magistrate's Council (CM) responsibility to make sure the judicial system works properly, to supervise the judicial authorities and take disciplinary action when things break horribly down. It is supposed to examine violations brought to its attention.

This includes overseeing the judiciary does not violate Human Rights, International Instruments, Swiss or cantonal laws.

If there is corruption among the system, the CM is responsible and supposed to take the necessary action too.

What has the Magistrate's Council been duly made aware of?

Every email the CM has received has indicated violations of:

• access to justice, which is a fundamental and universal Human Right as per the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and many other international instruments;
• jurisdiction attribution;
• the United Nations Convention Against Corruption by repression, retaliation against and persecution of whistleblower;
• failure to protect, and endanger, witness and victim rights, including children.

In addition the CM has been duly informed of:

• corruption among its ranks
• destruction of evidence by the judiciary

Arabelly Scyboz (ASC) and the CM of which ASC is president are fully aware of these violations, which fall under their authority to investigate and remedy, and have in full knowledge, deliberately, failed to address.

In a Human Rights violation aggravating move, ASC has banned electronic correspondence, repeatedly. In so doing she violates not only access to justice, she violates the very rules on which a properly functioning judiciary is based. The judiciary rules of electronic communication.

We've published in the 4 part series about how the Swiss judiciary authorities violate international law on electronic communication.

Commission by omission: child sexual abuse

Both international instruments and Swiss law foresee any Swiss authority to whom's attention has been brought child abuse is obligated to act, even if there is no obvious or apparent evidence of it.

In light of the CM and ASC being fully aware of the existence of recordings as evidence of the heinous crimes, and the fact they dismiss their responsibility, there is at least commission by omission of child sexual abuse by the CM and its president.

Wednesday's answer by the Magistrate's council

The Wednesday received answer of the CM is quite something:

• Lying to a non legal scholar civilian about the CM responsibilities;
• defamation of a victim-witness-whistleblower seeking assistance and protection;
• and threatening a victim with retaliation and repressive action.

Let's start with the email and its internet translation.

Sir, We would ask you urgently to cease your as numerous as ill-timed correspondences to the magistrate's council and directly to Mrs Scyboz. Neither are involved or competent to give any kind of response. We hope that our letter will be followed up in order to avoid us being obliged to consider taking other provisions or measures.

Let's get into the message bit by bit.

... numerous ... correspondences

The amount of Human Rights violations by the Swiss judiciary are “numerous”. Every week new violations, of which it is my duty to inform them.

The magistrate's council as you know get 1 email per week. Not more. And the only reason they receive an email is the non addressing of Human Rights violations.

As such, the Numerous correspondences claim is nothing short of defamation, attacking the victim-witness-whistleblower, who they have a duty, unalienable obligation, to protect.

... Ill-timed correspondences ...

It is not because the CM has potentially been on holiday that the Human Rights violations which they need to be informed of have stopped. Are they suggesting during their holidays they should not receive correspondences concerning Human Rights Violations?

If so, no auto reply or other information was received from the Magistrate's Council. Other authorities did have autoreplies.

Or would it mean Human Rights violations by the judiciary are OK when the CM is on holiday? Let's not be silly here.

I conclude it is nothing short of defamation geared towards the person who dares standing up for rights instead of geared towards the Human Rights violating perpetrators in the judiciary.

to the magistrate's council and directly to Mrs Scyboz

Should I understand ASC secretary is not aware their boss illegally banned the receiving of denunciations concerning issues of their responsibility?

It is a severe Human Rights violation to ban access to justice, particularly by the highest judiciary authority who should be fully aware of the rules.

Bullying in an attempt to divert responsibility of the correspondence banning by Swiss authorities should one day the public scrutiny call for their accountability?

Neither are involved or competent to give any kind of response.

Blatant and deliberate lie to deceive and bully a non legal scholar civilian. Issues are, as indicated higher in this post, their responsibility to deal with. It says so on their web site.

The highest judicial authority seeking to dismiss responsibility by lying to civilians is a heinous human rights violation. Seeking to cover up the non working of the system in this way will only aggravate the crimes they have so far collegially committed by deliberate omission to investigate.

We hope that our letter will be followed up in order to avoid us being obliged to consider taking other provisions or measures.

Let me rephrase in the non jargon language of regular people.

“If you don't shut up, we're going to do something, which we're not telling you what, to you”

You read this right. This is the highest judicial authority issuing a threat to a non legal scholar civilian – victim, witness, whistleblower – seeking access to justice and protection from judicial corruption and deliberate wrongdoing.

It is the kind of scene having its place on kids playgrounds. Not in a place of judicial authority.

Magistrate Council obligations

It is the CM obligation to denounce the heinous crimes of the system it is chief of, and provide protection from ongoing:

• denial of access to justice;
• illegal judgements and court proceedings;
• corruption;
• organised pay-for-contract child kidnapping from 4 countries;
• sexual abuse of children;
• psychological abuse of children;
• repression, retaliation against and persecution of whistleblower;

And more...

The refusal to denounce and provide protection, and the lying and threatening by the CM is no other then an effort to cover up the state's active involvement in criminality and corruption.

You can not claim Switzerland would be a civilised Human Rights and rule-of-law respecting nation, whilst its highest judicial authority leads the example of wrongdoing. In any civilised society, this sort of behaviour is punishable by law. In Switzerland, I am certain, the cover-up machine is desperately in full swing.

I've said it before and I reiterate: it is the Swiss national sport to violate Human Rights and persecute those who dare to point Swiss authorities wrongdoing.

I reiterate, should there be any doubt, having some 500 hours of recordings and documents as evidence to substantiate what I write about. I appreciate that must hurt Swiss authorities ego.

I appreciate the Universal Right to Truth is not something the Swiss are akin to, nor that they respect their country's international obligations under international law.

Those who have followed the blog will know by now: I will not stop until such time those authorities responsible for heinous Human Rights violations are held accountable, and the Universal Right to Truth prevails.

Feel the heat? Understand why they scramble to lie, repress, retaliate and persecute those who dare speak up? There's plenty more to come ...

P.S.: I'll most probably not respond to the email before Monday, there's something happening behind the scenes which I can't yet talk about. Maybe Monday. Suspense ...

Tags: #Rights #Whistleblower #Sexual #Psychological #Kidnapping #Accesstojustice

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

Who is Christian Fellrath?

Christian Fellrath (CF), is the director of the SPAJ, the Neuchatel cantonal adult and child protection service. CF is directly reporting and taking orders from the Councillor Crystel Graf (CG). YB & SN both take their orders from CF.

CF's whole career, since 1991, has been at the SPAJ, and he's been in director positions since 1998, first as head of what today is called the OPE, then since 2001 as director of the SPAJ.

there'll be a CF, YB, FS line-up of interferences in a later post

As supreme director of the department, for almost 23 years, CF holds responsibility for prevention, promotion and protection of children issues, as well as for attending to adults in difficulty. The SPAJ is also responsible for things like specialised child institutions, adoptions and foster care.

CF is a person around who there is very little transparency. CF does not have a profile page on the Cantonal official web site as is would be normal for a public servant of his high level responsibility.

CF is an expert at sending out dependent disciples, people who work for and depend on him for their livelihood, into positions where public disclosure of all mandates is required for the public's interest to have scrutiny. In this way, there is no scrutiny of his conflicts of interests. CF is not “officially” known to federal institutions, but he is there holding the puppets.

I'll give you a fun example: page 28 of the CFEJ 40 year celebration wish card shows the message of the official CFEJ representative SN discussed earlier. Notice how CF is the only cantonal director co-signing alongside the representative? In fact, it is the only co-signed message...

For some reason, he has managed to be a publicly unseen eel holding power of decision. (I use eel for this alliteration, since a snake you can catch with your both hands whereas an eel, forget it)

A broader internet search in the face of complete lack of transparency is bound to be incomplete. But it can point directions.

CF holds cantonal parliamentary positions:

• Groupe de travail chargé de la coordination interdépartementale de la politique sociale (GTCIPOS)
• Commission de Santé Mentale
• Commission du guichet sécurisé unique

Just like YB, the controller and controlled are one and the same.

From a previous post we know the SPAJ (co)represents the Neuchatel Central Authority on the latin cantons Federal Body of Child Adoptions, the CLACA, on which board CF has been member for over two decades, and at times president.

As Neuchatel Central Authority, CF has been on trips like Haïti and the Dominican Republic, representing the Neuchatel Canton authorities alongside the Swiss Federal Central authority. It is a rough job I am sure...

CF holds a plethora of mandates in various child related private foundations and associations. Such as (but not limited to):

• Neuchatel Red Cross (NRC) (there is an important link with the mother and the NRC director, more on that later)
• Adoptons-Nous, an adoption association openly linked to the SPAJ
• Pro Enfance, a privately funded national childhood action think-tank with a host of activities normally executed by SPAJ
• Fondation F.-L. Borel, private child in difficulty boarding and foster care institution.
• Fondation Carrefour, particularly with its AEMO (Action Educative en Milieu Ouvert) social assistants acting as private subcontractor for SPAJ care and protection responsibilities. There is a link to Xavier Humair, problematic school director, and the Services Social International Suisse lawyer Jean-Marie Rothlisberger. Both will be discussed at length in a separate topic.
• Les Billodes where CF is strangely representing the ministry of justice! This whilst the problematic (former) judge Isabelle Bieri, about who there will be a completely separate topic later, is also sitting on the council. The web site has been taken offline for me, so I have an archived PDF.

And quite frankly, there is so much more conflict of interest and interdisciplinary collegiality, read mafia, tying people's omerta up in the canton of Neuchatel you'd be blue in the face, if you are not already.

This Neuchatel Canton, and its authorities, are truly amazing. An open air museum with living relics of medieval vassalistic mob reality. The sad part is, it is ongoing and endangers children in plain sight.

The lack of official transparency on any person of authority is a problem to the public interest and scrutiny. As various UN documents alert, such lack of transparency is the source of much governmental criminality and corruption.

I invite you to keep searching the net. You can puzzle together CF holds important positions in various child related foundations and public authority decision making positions. And there are many documents and decisions of his hand mentioned in parliamentary work, of which only a very few can be traced.

Any Neuchatel whistleblower feeling like sending “le liver noir de la coparentalité”, an internal SPAJ working document arguing policy against co-parenting, is welcome to do so. Reach out on Twitter, or by email, which you'll find on this page.

Next post I'll blow the whistle on CF in the context of a foundation ... and a Child Sexual Integrity Violation ... And then finish off on a final CF post ... child kidnapping and endangerment. As they say in slang: he's a piece of work.

Series on Christian Fellrath, director of the Adult and Child Protection Services:

• part 1 { the ghost of child and adult protection services }
• part 2 { the failing of initiatives against child abuse }
• part 3 { (child) sexual violence parliamentary commission: canceled }
• part 4 { Incest according to Manon Schick}
• part 5 { What's the fuss about not bringing children to a court order about?}

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Psychological #Kidnapping

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

I suggest to go through the introduction of this topic.

Who is Yanick Bussy

YB is the chief of the OPE, the Neuchatel Child Protection Office. The OPE competences are described by law as being:

• Signalling children in need of protection to the APEA;
• Perform social enquiries as ordered by administrative and/or judicial authorities;
• Perform mandates by the judicial authorities;
• Propose, execute and follow-up child foster situations;
• Collaborate with administrative authorities, schools, institutions and partners concerned with the protection of minors;
• Inform, advise, council et support persons who consult their services in relation to child protection;
• Examine and suggest prevention measures.

Each and every by law indicated responsibility of the OPE is violated by the services of YB's office, including himself being personally aware of the violations and not doing anything to remedy.

It is strangely bewildering since YB has a bachelor's degree in psychology and in law.

He of all people is supposed to have the “qualities” to know when children are in danger, and at the same time know international law we've been discussing at length throughout the various topics of the blog.

While YB's information is not transparently or easily available in order for the public to be able to scrutinise his position for conflicts of interests, YB sits on various parliamentary commissions.

He is first and foremost a politician. I list those I could find which will be shown in later posts as conflicts of interests or trade in influence, underlining the criminality and corruption of the Neuchatel authorities:

• the Commission de santé scolaire (School Health commission);
• the Commission consultative de conseil et d’expertise en matière de pédagogie spécialisée (Specialised Education commission)
• the Commission technique en matière de lutte contre la violence domestique (Domestic Violence commission)

So YB seats in some of the parliamentary commissions where his OPE may be subject to scrutiny. The to be controlled who controls himself in the name of the public, so to speak. Democracy in one of its corrupt iterations, wouldn't you agree?

YB has also taken part in the 2018 Neuchatel parliamentary public hospitals working group Pour deux hôpitaux sûrs, autonomes et complémentaires and its report. I'll remember you about this when we'll discuss the role of the Neuchatel hospitals medical and legal personnel in the omerta, inter alea, of the lesions to the sexual organs of my children.

And lastly, he (co)represents the Neuchatel Central Authority on the latin cantons Federal Body of Child Adoptions, the CLACA.

YB confirmed investigation ... that never happened

Between September 2020 and January 2023 YB as head of the OPE received a total of 14 correspondences denouncing various acts by his team and violation of obligation to protect incidents.

This list excludes the Swiss court order violations by his team which I have been publishing about.

YB can not claim he is not fully aware of the evidence against his OPE concerning the: – CSIV (such as child sexual abuse) – CPIV (such as parental alienation, psychological abuse) – organised child kidnapping by his office – involvement and responsibility of his personnel

He acknowledges reception in his responses. dd. May 23rd 2022 he announces he has received the various elements and is conducting an investigation.

We acknowledge receipt of your e-mail dd May 9th concerning the follow-up of your children's case, CENSORED, within the Child Protection Office. The various elements set out in your email are currently being analysed in order to provide the most favourable response. We will send you a detailed reply as soon as possible

Throughout my correspondences I underlined I was available and wished to meet him, with the evidence. He never requested.

By chance, during his public appearance 6 months later I bumped into YB during a reception following the round table on parental consensus which was held on November 24th 2022.

When I pointed him to the fact his investigation report was long overdue, he got angry, and said agitated:

It is not because you have not received a report or have not been requested to submit information/evidence that I am not doing anything. I personally committed to you receiving this report, and you will receive it in due time.

YB doesn't know I was recording everything he said... ouch!

The only way to prove what I say is true in the face of criminal authorities is to record, as proclaimed repeatedly by the European Court of Human Rights as being the duty of an individual facing corrupt authorities.

Until this day, the promised report is still ... under YB's personal supervision?! And one must believe the investigation is being conducted ... extensively thoroughly?! Today is day 436 since he announced it. Wouldn't you agree to expect one hell of a report on the criminality and corruption in his department? But how would he do this without requesting the evidence I have?!

He's not the worst of the OPE-SPAJ lot, I assure you. Most probably, he's subject to walk the line expected of him by what the Swiss call “collegiality”, which in any other normal country is called mafia praxis.

In any case, he can not claim he is not aware, and so as head of the department he is at least responsible for commission by omission in serious child abuse and criminal matters.

Oh and Wednesday = Swiss authorities violating Swiss court order day

Same as last and every week for 19 consecutive weeks now. Mr. Bussy whose personnel and department are explicitly appointed in the Swiss court order, as silent and criminal as ever, violating the court order.

Next I'll peel (like an onion, layer by layer) as much as possible the big boss, SPAJ's Christian Fellrath. Maffia, anyone?

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Kidnapping #Psychological

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

MdM also argued it would not be guaranteed that my children would be together in the same foster home. They would most probably be split apart. I nor the mother would be allowed regular contact with them.

MdM argued it would be much worse for my children to be in foster care then being kidnapped to and sexually abused in Switzerland.

Being separated from normal contact with their stay-at-home full-time caring father she found was a lesser evil, regardless of her clearly underlining there not only was no problem with me but that my children actively need and ask for me, their caring father.

I argued the stay-at-home full-time parent, myself, was fully available to the children, that foster care would by no means be needed. That not returning them and not protecting them from further violence is criminal.

MdM expressed literally she “refused to believe” my children were in any danger, regardless of the hard evidence, which in writing she refused to receive!

This, and more, is on recording. MdM is a social assistant at the Neuchatel child protection services. Some of her many problematic interventions have been mentioned before. Her extensive corruption, criminality, intimidation, trading in influence,... and violation of (child) human rights will be discussed in detail later. A total of 4 hours recordings and several documents.

The interim report

An interim report on Neuchatel foster care was submitted in December 2020. The minister Crystel Graf presented the report to the Neuchatel government in May 2021. It highlights problems and hierarchical responsibility in the cantonal child protection services.

The independent interim report on the implementation of the Neuchatel Cantonal child foster care reform was contracted to Dr. Philip D. Jaffé. Dr. Philip D. Jaffé (PJ), is the Swiss specialised pedopsychiatrist heading the Geneva University Rights of the Child division, and seats as an independent expert in the monitoring body of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

You can read the full 57 page report, but I give you a few highlights.

PJ has had to work with what was offered to him:

nous ne disposons pas de chiffres l’analyse d’un échantillon des dossiers des enfants en famille d’accueil fournie par le SPAJ

we have no data analysis of a sample of foster children's files provided by the SPAJ

The report had to be drafted in absence of data, and only had access to a by the SPAJ determined sample of cases. I would consider this a form of censorship.

Il ressort de manière explicite que, dans la pratique, les professionnel-les opèrent des choix par rapport au type d’informations à partager sur l’enfant ou le/la jeune

It is clear that, in practice, professionals make choices about the type of information to share about the child or young person.

In addition, PJ noted that the information professionals decide to share or not is their personal choice. Arbitrary information so to speak.

plusieurs professionnel-les ont signalé que la communication à l’interne du SPAJ était insuffisante, comme cela a été le cas au sein de l’OPE rapports de collaboration dont certains ne sont pas encore entièrement établis à satisfaction

several professionals reported that communication within the SPAJ was inadequate, as was the case within the OPE collaboration reports of which some have not yet been fully and satisfactorily drawn up

Communication and collaboration within and between the SPAJ and OPE is problematic.

née de contraintes budgétaires

born of budgetary constraints

As always in Neuchatel, there is an alleged money problem ...

l’enfant a le droit d’être impliqué et de participer dans les proccessus décisionnels qui le concernent, la mise en œuvre de ce droit peine encore à s’imposer

children have the right to be involved and to participate in decision-making processes that affect them, the implementation of this rights is still problematic.

The Rights of the Child to be heard and participate in decisions are not respected.

un soutien à l’inflexion de la conceptualisation et des pratiques de protection de l’enfant soit formulé et opérationnalisé aux niveaux les plus élevés de l’administration et de la politique

support for changes in the conceptualisation and practice of child protection has to be formulated and implemented at the highest levels of administration and policy

Speaks for itself, no support by OPE and SPAJ director and minister.

The report as such, politely, highlights profound structural problems:

• absence of data;
• censored and arbitrary information;
• problematic communication and collaboration;
• lack of budget;
• rights of the child violated;
• insufficient support by the highest administrative and political authorities.

I've documented concrete examples of each of these structural problems in various previous posts. Are we surprised the fish rots from the head, the highest authorities, as usual?

I think the following is the best conclusion, as per the report:

Si l’évaluation que le CIDE a mené ne porte « que » sur un bilan intermédiaire de la réforme du dispositif de soutien de protection de l’enfant et de la jeunesse, nous sommes convaincu-es qu’il ne s’agit que d’un premier grand pas d’un long marathon de transformation en profondeur des pratiques des professionnel-les des secteurs qui y sont associés et qu’il convient de poser au centre de cette évolution la formation de base et continue des intervenant-es en protection de l’enfant au sens large, à savoir toutes celles et ceux qui travaillent avec et pour la protection de l’enfant.

Although the evaluation carried out by CIDE is “only” an interim assessment of the reform of the child and youth protection support system, we are convinced that this is only the first major step in a long marathon of in-depth transformation of the practices of professionals in the associated sectors, and that the basic and ongoing training of child protection workers in the broad sense, i.e. all those who work with and for child protection, should be at the centre of this development.

PJ really knows how to put things softly, politically correct, so no one's toes are stepped on. But it also allows for little accountability or pressure for change.

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Kidnapping

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

the use of mediation to avert criminal proceedings

Offering mediation in criminal behaviour against children gives the advantage to the perpetrators.

Kidnap the child, then you mediate whilst the child remains illegally detained in the hands of people whose greatest interest is to manipulate the child into saying whatever is convenient to the kidnapper's defence.

Sexually abuse a child, then you mediate whilst the child remains in sexual abuse recidivism.

Amazon bulks of books on the subject of child alienation, loyalty conflicts, victim-perpetrator dependence and other violence. It could not be more documented. And yet lawmakers, the judicial systems, and even the fourth power flee from the well documented child-perpetrator psychological abuse and power subject.

There should I believe never be any mediation in international child kidnapping and child sexual integrity violations.

A comparative table of mediation violation in Switzerland

the SSI-S leveraging power collegially with the Swiss mental health industry

The SSI-S and the Swiss courts use mental health professionals, producing false reports, to justify child kidnapping to Switzerland. Often, reports are contracted to state mental health authorities. Whether the non SSI-S contracting parent and/or the children met the mental health professional does not matter. The post Swiss psychologists are untouchable describes the problematic mental health professionals situation in Switzerland.

The psychologist Yvan Rupp, and probably also the cantonal head pedopsychiatrist Hélène Beutler (both of the CNP), interacted with the by the child kidnapping mother contracted SSI-S and the OPE (Office de Protection des Enfants = Neuchatel Child Protection Services) on how the kidnapping would substantiate.

Celia (Schaller) Fleuri, psychologist, directed the child kidnapping mother, at least by SMS, that the SSI-S, with her support, would be able to kidnap my children.

Pity Swiss law does not have criminal gang related legislation, unlike most of the civilised world. In many countries this typical mental health professionals and SSI-S ganging behaviour would constitute a criminal offence, and would be prosecuted. In Switzerland, no law, no problem.

Conclusion: mediation abuse and mental health ganging are made to serve perpetrators

The kidnapper, the pay-for-service SSI-S, the Swiss courts and Swiss authorities use mediation and the mental health industry for their child kidnapping planning and other purposes.

The perception of mediation in child kidnapping and CSIV is crucially important to wrongdoers. Real mediation rules are liberally violated. The word “mediation” is used merely and only in order to schmuck up grim and human right violating situations that need hiding by those calling for it. It is used and abused to take an essential place in the creation of a judicial truth that serves monetary interests, and serves criminal indictment avoidance interests, by Swiss state authorities and perpetrators and the SSI-S, in matters of International Child Abduction to Switzerland and CSIV in Switzerland.

The children in that? Except as a commercial and judicial excuse, children are no where in the picture of mediation or the mental health industry.

The protection of children from CSIV? Constantly deferred and put aside.

The target of mediation is simple: 1. kidnap children; 2. destroy all contact with the stay-at-home parent, closest family members, the child social circles, language, ...; 3. make sure the children can never be returned; 4. discredit children's spontaneous notification to the point that the origin of even hospital ER genital wounds do not get examined.

{End of series on mediation}

• part 1 { the use and abuse of false mediation and the mental health industry to legalise child kidnapping }
• part 2 { intermezzo: mediation as Swiss court turned sour mental health mayonnaise? }
• part 3 { the use and abuse of false mediation and the mental health industry to legalise child kidnapping {continued} }

Tags: #Rights #Sexual #Kidnapping

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023

the judge Marie-Pierre de Montmollin (MPDM)

The Swiss judicial child kidnapping dictator, MPDM, who is supposed to be the “competent supreme” in international child kidnapping, asked the SSI-S network lawyer Jean-Marie Rothlisberger to organise mediation. The judge's request was explicitly for the Neuchatel CERFASY.

The CERFASY does not offer mediation. It is a have it al business for psychologists: courses, seminars, counselling, and a clinic. No mediation whatsoever.

MPDM, as president of Gemme Switzerland, knew this of course.

The CERFASY and/or Rothlisberger attributed the mediation mandate to Thierry Gros (TG).

Thierry Gros, testament to the still existing but empty page, has apparently left the CERFASY. Luckily, I have for the purposes of justice a copy of his profile while working at the CERFASY.

From the onset TG admitted it was strange he, or even the CERFASY, was appointed, confirming he had no formal training or experience in mediation. He knew even less about mediation in international child abduction cases.

One of his first questions was if I would give him authorisation to correspond with his colleague Yvan Rupp (YR), the problematic psychologist.

YR worked for both the problematic and state dependent Centre Neuchatelois de Psychiatrie (CNP), and the CERFASY. As per YR CERFASY profile, he left the CNP in 2021.

I naturally refused, but you understand, them being colleagues and working together, friendly collegial talk over a coffee is ... human? Conflict of interest is mildly putting it.

The CNP is the Neuchatel state institute, as defined by law:

Depuis le 1er janvier 2009, le partenaire unique de l’État en matière de prise en charge psychiatrique est le Centre neuchâtelois de psychiatrie (CNP), comme le prévoit la loi sur le Centre neuchâtelois de psychiatrie (LCNP), du 29 janvier 2008.

TG from the onset tried to convince me, now that my kids were kidnapped to Neuchatel and detained there, the courts would never accept to send them back. Explaining that the mother works for a state subcontractor, has Swiss nationality, and had managed to illegally attribute domicile of my kids to Neuchatel without parental consent.

Mediation by someone who has no competence in mediation, serving only an effort to get my approval for the kidnapping. Naturally one can not agree with such situation.

TG attributed in his correspondence the failure of the “mediation” to ... me.

And the judge, MPDM, gladly noted her plan had worked. She had created a judicial truth contrary to reality, ground to alienate the stay-at-home father of the kids and decide to keep them in Switzerland.

the judge Nathalie Guillaume-Gentil Gross (NGGG)

NGGG was touched upon twice already, here and here. So you may have read before that before opening the court hearing, NGGG blackmailed: “I have read the documents and I am fully aware you asked CSIV protection measures for your children. Let me be very clear that I will not treat this aspect in court today. If you dare to bring it up during the hearing, not only I will dismiss it, I will condemn you and you will not see your children for a very long time. Is that clear Sir?”

During the court hearing she made clear if I would not agree to a “mediated temporary solution” of only seeing my children on Wednesdays afternoons between 14:00 and 17:30 , which she unilaterally imposed, she would judge I would not get to have any contact with them.

My back then Swiss lawyer said I had to agree. He indicated this was a most strange way of doing things, that he would later appeal and turn the tide (which he never did), but that I had to sign there and then or it would be more difficult to re-establish contact afterwards. Under duress and threat, I was forced to sign.

the judge Yannick Jubin (YJ)

YJ claims the “mediated agreements” he chaired in court are true and valid and in the best interest of the children. Quod non.

The alleged agreements before YJ are no less then the previous examples obtained under threat and duress.

YJ prides himself in court repeatedly the only thing that is of his interest is the children. Yet his actions are violating children's rights, and the most basic human rights.

I have to travel at least 9 hours one-way to come to court. ( google maps ) (A following post will show how this is transnational repression given the Swiss and international law)

Some 7 hours of continuous court session without lunch break. During the session YJ dismissed official (governmental) evidence, refused to take a USB stick with 500 hours recordings, accepted clearly false evidence, forgery and lies of the kidnapping mother instead, and knowing but not taking into account I had 9 hours driving and it being well past 4PM he ultimately gave me a choice: either sign his imposed “mediated agreement” or he would see to it I would no longer have access to my kids.

YJ watches over the judicial truth that clears Swiss authorities criminality. He doesn't give a rats arse about children or their well being.

so what is mediation to the Swiss justice system?

The Swiss justice system clearly does not know what mediation is. It uses the concept of mediation to threaten people who are under duress.

The Swiss justice system seeks secondary victimisation of those who are witness and victims. Those who should be protected are violated their most basic human rights.

The Swiss justice system serves the purpose of alienation, and keeps children in abuse.

But more importantly, it makes sure state authorities, including the judges, committing crimes, go free.

All three examples are violations of the conventions against slavery and torture, which will be covered later.

• part 1 { the use and abuse of false mediation and the mental health industry to legalise child kidnapping }
• part 2 { intermezzo: mediation as Swiss court turned sour mental health mayonnaise? }
• part 3 { the use and abuse of false mediation and the mental health industry to legalise child kidnapping {continued} }

Tags: #Rights #Kidnapping #Sexual

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. This blog gets the proverbial pants on!

information provided as is, without prejudice, without any prejudicial recognition, and with reservation of all rights, expressly without recognition of any Swiss competence which remains contested

for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all information on this blog, such as but not limited to documents and/or audio recordings and/or video recordings and/or pictures mentioned, have been made and/or collected, and published, in the interest of justice and the public at large

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to everything on this blog

the Universal Right to Truth principle applies to everything on this blog

© Copyright 2023